AB 2289 - New Smog Check Law effective 01/01/2013

HitandRunDriver

Amateur Goon
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Posts
1,431
Reaction score
0
Location
Orange, California
This may have been brought up before but after a quick search I didn't really see anything about it. Still trying to understand this new method fully but does this look like good, bad, or neither for us California folks.


AB 2289 - New Smog Check Law


Set to begin January 01, 2013; Model year 2000 and newer vehicles will no longer require the tailpipe emissions test portion of the smog check process. AB 2289 will require late model vehicles be administered the smog check's visual and functional tests only.

The implementation of AB 2289 is expected to reduce the time and cost of the smog check. The program will now take better advantage of a vehicle's OBD II technology by eliminating tailpipe testing and instead using the vehicle's own OBD II emissions monitoring system.

This new smog test system is already in place in 22 other states. "This new and improved program will have the same result as taking 800,000 old cars off the road, also resulting in a more cost effective program for California motorists." said ARB Chairman, Mary D. Nichols.

Currently California's smog check procedure requires all vehicles undergo a tailpipe emissions inspection to measure harmful pollutant output from the tailpipe, a visual inspection for present and properly installed emissions components, a functional test to insure the proper operation of various emission components; and as part of the functional test, an OBD II computer diagnostic check.

Under AB 2289, the tailpipe emissions portion of the smog inspection will be eliminated for 2000 model and newer cars, trucks, vans, and SUVs.
Background on the OBD II system - All vehicles imported into the United States as of 1996 have had to be equipped with an On Board Diagnostics system referred to as OBD II. The OBD II diagnostic system is designed to monitor all aspects of your engine's emission conditions and report this information to a central database within it's computer. This information is processed and checked against the computers pre-determined values for various input levels and performance patterns.

If any problems are found, the computer will determine whether to alert the driver or not. If a decision has been made to alert the driver of an emissions problem, the "Check Engine" or "Engine Malfunction" light will illuminate on the vehicle's dashboard. In more serious emission conditions the computer may even begin to rapidly flash the "Check Engine/Malfunction" light indicating to the driver, that the vehicle needs immediate diagnosis/repair attention.
AB 2289 now requires the smog test inspection to rely on data from a vehicle's own on board emissions computer to determine the vehicle's harmful emissions production as opposed to using a smog machine to sample the vehicle's emissions output from the tailpipe. This design is expected to reduce the cost of equipment at the smog station, reduce the amount of time it takes to smog check a vehicle, and reduce the cost of the smog inspection to the consumer.


AB 2289 - Makes changes to the following smog inspection procedures and guidelines:
A. Authorize the use of On Board Diagnostic II testing to expedite the process.

B. Vehicles known to release large amounts of pollution must test at stations with the highest performance ratings.

C. Stricter fines structure for improper inspections.

D. Permit the state to contract with the private sector to manage franchise-like networks of independently owned Smog Check stations.
E. Encourage community colleges and other training institutions to develop technician-training programs.
 

Black_GT

SIIXVII
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Posts
1,533
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles, CA
So the benefit from not having the tailpipe sniffer is to just bring down the time and cost of getting a smog check? I'd still have to swap my stock catted mid pipe to pass anyway Bahumbug.
 

HellsBells

620/677
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Posts
5,576
Reaction score
9
Location
SoCal
So the benefit from not having the tailpipe sniffer is to just bring down the time and cost of getting a smog check? I'd still have to swap my stock catted mid pipe to pass anyway Bahumbug.

You could use dummy cats. It sounds like as long as you pass OBD II and visual, you're good to go.

Sounds like they are doing what MA did a while back. Ditching the pricey sniffers and going OBDII + visual.
 

Thekid760

forum member
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Posts
709
Reaction score
0
Location
West Coast
so if one were to theoretically have dummy cats and the rear O2's turned off, would one still pass?
 

mot250

forum member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Posts
137
Reaction score
0
I think if the car's rear O2 sensors are turned off, that will be detected by the car's OBDII computer as "not ready" resulting in a technical failure at which point they tell you to go drive around a few days and come back. The system only recognizes the O2 sensors as "not ready", the same as if the battery was disconnected or codes had recently been erased by a scan tool or handheld tuner.

There have been a few treads about States with the OBDII testing and rear O2 sensors turned off testing as "not ready"
 

HellsBells

620/677
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Posts
5,576
Reaction score
9
Location
SoCal
so if one were to theoretically have dummy cats and the rear O2's turned off, would one still pass?

Nope. mot250 is right. I've been told you can have the O2's set to "N/A" instead of "OFF" and that makes it pass. No idea how the tuner does that though.

Either way, you could use a spacer and weld it into the dummy cat.
 

shatter

White And Nerdy
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Posts
882
Reaction score
22
Location
Northern California
Not to revive an old thread but I know some folks that work for CARB in Sacramento that I can ask questions of. I have even been in a meeting with Mary Nichols. ;) woooo, I am special like that!

I work for Caltrans and have a finger in emissions modeling is why...
 

HellsBells

620/677
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Posts
5,576
Reaction score
9
Location
SoCal
Not to revive an old thread but I know some folks that work for CARB in Sacramento that I can ask questions of. I have even been in a meeting with Mary Nichols. ;) woooo, I am special like that!

I work for Caltrans and have a finger in emissions modeling is why...

Can you please propose this idea I've had for years now? This is going to sound ridiculous but I've been telling people that this is a great idea, in my opinion.

Impose a ricer tax. Don't call it a ricer tax but let that be what it is. Make people pay, I don't know, $400? $500? Whatever it is, on top of their annual registration and give them carte blanche to modify their vehicles as they please. Put restrictions on noise and whatnot, maybe raise the emissions permissible? Seems like an easy way to raise revenue for the state and also let people have a little more freedom.

Personally, if I still lived in CA, I'd be willing to pay around $500, maybe a little more, per year just to be left alone to do what I want to my car.
 

lostsoul

2014 vett or 2015 stang..
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Posts
6,963
Reaction score
95
Location
Gay Area
humm...

-"B. Vehicles known to release large amounts of pollution must test at stations with the highest performance ratings." -


So that means if I have high performance like 580hp then I pass? :beerdrink:


to bad my car is registered in a non-smog area.. hahah... woooooooo wooooooo


PS> Get me a job in caltrans!! :(
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top