CPRsm
forum member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reaction score
- 1
Nobody's deflecting sweetheart. I quoted and aswered specifically, each worn out tired point you tried to make. I'm sure you can find a video if you try. Keep those internet haxor skillz sharp. But I'm sure you're in no hurry to post a vid of a car that has you covered by half a second and 6mph by the 1/8th.
I might be wrong but I don't recall you asking for a WOT pass once. I remember you posting danners brake holds WOT better, an incorrect wiring diagram of a brake w no line pressure raised, and a video to prove it didn't work. But I don't remember you actually being civil and just asking for one. Until you guys take the bet you won't get a video until someone just happens to be filming Chris like last time.
It's understandable if you don't comprehend the terminology. Commanding airflow is what you tell the ecu you are moving in lbs/min. In the maf transfer function, that's how you richen the engine. You command more airflow so the duty cycle on the injectors is raised. Commanded is different than what is actually happening. Just like commanding a certain degree of timing and not getting because of other variables. Comanding airflow will not change the actual airflow. Like everything else in this ecu it's an expected calculation. Now all definitions and wording semantics aside, the long and short is in your tune you tell the ecu to expect 1200 horsepower worth or air on E85 because, like your brake, was hacked from the get go. And you had to command that much airflow so all 500hp wouldn't lean out. Now you know you've sent out logs, and to who. And you know I'm not making it up. Because I just might be able to post a log and show everyone your bark is louder than your bite.
That just opens up a whole new can of worms when expected airflow is that dicked up. Starting with the load tables. That's enough airflow to max out Ford's hard limit load of 3.0
Which means you had NO resolution in your load tables. Know what depends on load? Timing is one. Other is transmission shifting. Now with not resolution and such HUGE jump between cells I wonder how accurate shifting would be. I'd imagine it would be hard to acurately test multiple products and pinpoint a shifting problem when the tune is jacked from the get go. A tests results are only as accurate as the input.
Keep is classy bitch. Don't bring family into it. Especially laying another mans wife up for bait. You won't like my response, and I won't insult his wife out of spite for an internet degenerate. Try to keep your bouts of stupidity focused K?
