Before and After Kooks headers dyno

Chris B.

forum member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Posts
966
Reaction score
6
Location
PA
I installed the Kooks long tube headers, high flow cats, and H pipe on Feb. 28th with the help of a friend. The car isn't much louder at idle, but definitely is louder and has a different tone at full throttle.

I dynoed the car this afternoon. Stock it made 279.9 HP and 295.5 ft-lbs at the rear wheels. With the Steeda CAI and Cali emissions tune for the CAI, it made 295.6 HP and 313.1 ft-lbs at the rear wheels. With the headers installed and the same 91 octane Cali Emission tune, it made 311.3 HP and 325.2 ft-lbs at the rear wheels. The A/F ratio was nearly perfect from 3500 RPM to 6500 RPM. I have a 93 octane 49 state tune that I haven't installed yet. It should get me a few more horsepower at the rear wheels.

The peak numbers don't tell everything. The area under the curve is much greater. Also, now the car makes more horsepower form 4600 RPM to the rev limiter than it made at the peak when it was stock. It makes more torque from 3500 RPM to 5500 RPM than it made at the peak when it was stock. After the headers and intake, when compared to stock, the greatest HP gains were an additional 37 HP at 6100 RPM and 31 ft-lbs at 6100 RPM. When the car was stock I only wound it out to 6100 RPM on the dyno. Now it pulls well to 6500 RPM+.

The shop's printer is low on one color ink, so the printout of the dyno doesn't look great. I got a copy of the dyno runs on floppy and used Dynojet's WinPep software to make a screen capture comparing my results. The blue line is stock, the red line is with the intake, and the green line is with the headers.

2008 Mustang Dyno-1024.jpg
 

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,630
Reaction score
488
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Cool, can't wait to hear the "Headers do nothing" crowd's take on this.
Can't wait to add these to my car as well.
 

antonio1988

Redline: 8600rpm
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Posts
1,920
Reaction score
12
Location
Miami, FL
Cool, can't wait to hear the "Headers do nothing" crowd's take on this.
Can't wait to add these to my car as well.

Headers don't do anything on a 3v....













J/k I have mac longtubes and I love them, good for you OP, if it wasn't for Cali being so gay, you could be making a lot closer to 330rwhp
 

jroc07gt

its orange not yellow!!
Joined
May 24, 2009
Posts
1,618
Reaction score
5
Location
hammond,la
Did you happen to get an SAE corrected dyno? since everyone was giving me shit about posting a std corrected dyno sheet.....
 
Last edited:

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,630
Reaction score
488
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Did you happen to get an SAE corrected dyno? since everyone was giving me shit about posting a std corrected dyno sheet.....
And yet the only properly corrected dyno is 1320ft long, is at sea level and has a DA of zero.
It's good to see all the data from the same dyno overlain on each other.
 

Greg Hazlett

Stepping on the Pink Bus
Official Vendor
S197 Team Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Posts
23,977
Reaction score
336
Location
Chesapeake, VA
That is good to know as I had my Kooks with a catted H pipe installed today and I can't wait to see how the LT's compliment the Hot Rod cams.
 

KDT

forum member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Posts
267
Reaction score
1
Location
north central South Carolina
Man, that is some good info. When I installed mine I could tell a big difference. I was told by some idiot on another forum that the power gain that I felt was all psychological because it sounded better and in reality the long tubes didn't add any power. I guess I didn't imagine it after all. Now I feel better.
 
Last edited:

Chris B.

forum member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Posts
966
Reaction score
6
Location
PA
Did you happen to get an SAE corrected dyno? since everyone was giving me shit about posting a std corrected dyno sheet.....

The SAE, STD, DIN, EEC, and JIS dyno results show about the same power gains. The peak numbers are slightly different depending on what correction I use. They don't seem to vary a whole lot because most of the dynos were done in 69-80 degree weather with similar humidity and similar barometric pressure. Correction factors don't matter much for comparing results as long as you always use the same correction factor for all your dyno pulls to compare your results.

And yet the only properly corrected dyno is 1320ft long, is at sea level and has a DA of zero.

Intalling the intake dropped my 1/4 mile times by 0.2-0.3 seconds. That correlates well with the power gains. Hoepfully I'll be in the high 12's with the headers.

It's good to see all the data from the same dyno overlain on each other.

I also noticed that the back to back runs, with short cool down periods between runs, on the same dyno on the same day usually within 1 HP of each other. This dyno seems pretty consistent, but I've noticed most dynos are if you have similar coolant temps on each dyno pull since the atmospheric conditions don't vary much.

Man, that is some good info. When I installed mine I could tell a big difference. I was told by some idiot on another forum that the power gain that I felt was all psychological because it sounded better and in reality the long tubes didn't add any power. I guess I didn't imagine it after all. Now I feel better.

I think that anyone who says that long tube ehaders won't show a power gain on the S197 Mustang GT's is a complete F*cking moron. You can quote me on that.

Looking at the stock exhaust manifolds, which aren't much better than a regular plain old log manifold, and comparing them to long tubes, you can see why the long tubes will allow the exhaust to flow much better, improve scavenging, and allow the car to make more power.
 

KDT

forum member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Posts
267
Reaction score
1
Location
north central South Carolina
I think that anyone who says that long tube ehaders won't show a power gain on the S197 Mustang GT's is a complete F*cking moron. You can quote me on that.
Agree 100%. Ive been knowing about the gains for quite awhile. Congrats on the new found power and sound!
 

bigray327

Senior Member
S197 Team Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Posts
4,452
Reaction score
99
Location
League City, Texas
Chris,

I agree that long tubes help, but your post only shows that the headers AND the high-flow cats/H-pipe made more power. If you really wanted to show that headers alone make more power, you would have had to run the stock midpipe, or at least the stock cats. So you might want to get off your high horse about the power gains coming SOLELY from the headers, and maybe jump onto a slightly shorter horse.

Again, I agree that long tubes help make more power, but I do agree with a lot of people that deleting the restriction of the stock cats is also responsible for some of that power.
 

topbliss

Senior Member
Joined
May 14, 2008
Posts
1,680
Reaction score
2
Location
South Jersey
nice numbers.... :highfive:Who ever would actually believe LT's don't do anything, just don't know.
 

DusterRT

Defected to Deutsche
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Posts
1,707
Reaction score
32
Location
Seattle, the Sunshine City
I won't deny there are gains with headers (the proof is above, but also keep Ray's point in mind!), but I wouldn't be so quick to write off the psychological stuff as BS. Changes in sound can play funny tricks on you. When I put my Pypes mid-muffler system on, it sure seemed a lot "faster" when the reality is that gains from cat/axle backs are minimal if anything. After I got tired of the shitty fitment of the Pypes setup, I swapped everything out for a Magnaflow catted X and Corsa Touring (quiet) axle backs. It became a lot more quiet inside the car, and it just felt slower..when the reality is if anything, I should have picked up some power from the high flow cats and presumably better flowing mufflers.
 

MOC826

I have a shitty program!
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Posts
790
Reaction score
8
Location
Texas
Chris,

I agree that long tubes help, but your post only shows that the headers AND the high-flow cats/H-pipe made more power. If you really wanted to show that headers alone make more power, you would have had to run the stock midpipe, or at least the stock cats. So you might want to get off your high horse about the power gains coming SOLELY from the headers, and maybe jump onto a slightly shorter horse.

Again, I agree that long tubes help make more power, but I do agree with a lot of people that deleting the restriction of the stock cats is also responsible for some of that power.
Agreed!
I won't deny there are gains with headers (the proof is above, but also keep Ray's point in mind!), but I wouldn't be so quick to write off the psychological stuff as BS. Changes in sound can play funny tricks on you. When I put my Pypes mid-muffler system on, it sure seemed a lot "faster" when the reality is that gains from cat/axle backs are minimal if anything. After I got tired of the shitty fitment of the Pypes setup, I swapped everything out for a Magnaflow catted X and Corsa Touring (quiet) axle backs. It became a lot more quiet inside the car, and it just felt slower..when the reality is if anything, I should have picked up some power from the high flow cats and presumably better flowing mufflers.

Agreed! the sound has some crazy effects on you (or it did with me) and in all honesty... ALMOST 16hp gain isnt that much for spending $1300 on a lt and high flow cats. yes you will feel a difference, no there are not that big of gains on the dyno (i have seen better on other cars but will not say which ones), BUT its not the dyno that matters anyways, its how much faster you will run at the track.. so have fun with the new setup :thumb:
 

Chris B.

forum member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Posts
966
Reaction score
6
Location
PA
Chris,
I agree that long tubes help, but your post only shows that the headers AND the high-flow cats/H-pipe made more power. If you really wanted to show that headers alone make more power, you would have had to run the stock midpipe, or at least the stock cats. So you might want to get off your high horse about the power gains coming SOLELY from the headers, and maybe jump onto a slightly shorter horse.

Its nearly impossoble to run the stock cats and stock mid pipe with long tube headers. That would require some custom work including cutting off the stock cats and rewelding them in at an odd angle. The stock cats are higher up than the collectors of the long tube headers.

Again, I agree that long tubes help make more power, but I do agree with a lot of people that deleting the restriction of the stock cats is also responsible for some of that power.

It doesn't seem that replacing the stock cats with ones that flow better gives much of a power gain at all based on dyno results posted here and other places. To me it seems that replacing the stock cats with a higher flow version might get you 2 HP at the most when looking at the dyno results before and after the stock H pipe and a catted aftermarket H pipe.

I've seen the dyno results before and after the Mac pro chamber with and without cats. At one point, I was considering getting JBA equal length shorties and the catted Pro Chamber for emissions reasons, but they stopped production of the catted pro chamber for the S197 and I could't find it anywhere. The difference in SAE corrected dyno results with the catted and catless pro chamber seems to be around 3-4 HP on two cars with the same mods(same intake, same canned tune from the intake manfacturer) other than the catted or catless pro chamber.

Its harder to compare corrected power results of other cars because there are variations from the factory. My results were 311 HP and 325 ft-lbs using STD correction and 302 HP and 316 ft-lbs using SAE correction. However, if we do look at corrected results, this is what I found:

  • I found another s197 with a custom 93 octane tune, CAI, and Bassani exhaust with off road X pipe. Its SAE results were about 10 HP at the wheels less than mine peak and it looked like it lost power in the upper RPM range faster than my car did.
  • I also found a dyno of another S197 Mustang with a CAI, tune, offroad H pipe, and axle back exhaust. Its SAE and STD dyno results on a dynojet were more than 10 HP less at the wheels than my results with the same correction factors.
  • Another one I found is a S197 with FRPP shorty headers, off road H pipe, CAI, and 91 octane tune. Its SAE corrected dyno results were 11 HP at the wheels less than my SAE corrected results.
  • There is another I found with a CAI, 91 octane tune, stock exhaust manifolds, a Bassani X pipe with high flow cats, and cat back exhaust. Its SAE dyno results was 292 HP at the wheels. After the installation of the Steeda UDP kit, it gained 8 HP peak at the wheels peak to bring it up to 298 HP. I have the stock crank and accessory pulley on my car. So it made 10 HP less at the wheels with the CAI, tune, offroad X pipe with high flow cats, and cat back exhaust.
  • I found another with the JBA shorties, Pypes offroad X pipe, JLT CAI, Bamachips 93 octane tune, CMCV deletes, and Steeda UDP's. Its SAE corrected results were 296-298 HP at the wheels on multiple dyno pulls. That's with CMCV deleteds and Steeda UDP's, neither of which my car has. The addition of both the CMCV deletes and the Steeda UDP set is good for 10 HP or more depending on who's results you look at.
  • I found another dyno that showed the before and after results of CMCV deletes, Steeda UDP set and a Bassani offroad X pipe with stock maifolds. The results with the other mods before the CMCV deletes, Steeda UDP set and a Bassani offroad X pipe were 289 HP. The results after the CMCV deletes, Steeda UDP set and a Bassani offroad X pipe and custom tune were 304 HP. Both were on the same dyno. Considering the CMCV deletes and UDP's were installed at the same time, as the offroad X pipe the offroad X pipe looks like its good for only a few horsepower.
Getting rid of the stock cats and replacing them with high flow cats and an aftermarket H pipe doesn't seem to do much for power gains. If you have multiple results that show otherwise, I'd like to see them.

It looks like I can't find a single dyno of a S197 Mustang GT with an offroad X or H pipe and stock manifolds or shorty headers that has similar other mods as mine that can produce anywhere near the horsepower HP of what my SAE or STD corrected results are and I have cats and an H pipe. The difference between the Kooks long tube headers on the same car with and without the high flow cats is also about 5 to 8 HP at the wheels on naturally aspirated S197 GT's depending on who's results you look at.

Based on the dyno results of other cars, if I were to compare apples to appes with the cars that have no cats to just see the effects of the headers alone when comapred to stock manfiolds and no cats, then my results would be even higher.

Agreed! the sound has some crazy effects on you (or it did with me) and in all honesty... ALMOST 16hp gain isnt that much for spending $1300 on a lt and high flow cats. yes you will feel a difference, no there are not that big of gains on the dyno (i have seen better on other cars but will not say which ones), BUT its not the dyno that matters anyways, its how much faster you will run at the track.. so have fun with the new setup

I got in on a group buy with the Kooks headers and my price shipped to my door was much less than that. If I went without the cats I could have saved another $100 and gained more power. It ended up being not all that much more costly when compared to getting the JBA equal length shorties and a good quality catted H pipe or getting high flow cats installed into an off road pro chamber, which was the setup I was originally looking at for emissions and sound reasons.

Looking at other people's results and talking with a shop owner that has done multiple installs of the Kooks headers on S197's with and without cats, it seems that if I went without the high flow cats, I probably would see at least another 5 HP at the wheels, maybe more. Also, the power gains from headers depends on what other modificatiosn you have. Anything you do on the intake side to increase air flow before you install the headers could give you bigger gains after the install. A custom tune after the headers could also increase the power too.
 

yellowjohn1

forum member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Posts
435
Reaction score
5
All this debate seems a little silly really. LT's help gain power, so does a less restrictive mid pipe. Just so happens they are often installed together and people seem hell bent on proving that one or the other makes all the power and the other doesn't do anything. Who cares? Fact is, if you are looking to make max power for your car, unless you have a turbo, good LT's and a free flowing mid pipe are BOTH going to be needed. Why does it seem like people have something personal invested in which part makes the power? It's been understood for many years that exhaust restrictions have the most impact as you near the port on the head so yes, good headers will improve performance, maybe a little more than the mid pipe will. A bottle necked system at the midpipe won't allow proper flow either though, so yes, a free flowing mid pipe will also help gain power. :dead2:
 

beefcake

Forced Induction Specialist
Official Vendor
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Posts
4,376
Reaction score
23
Location
Bethel, Ohio
just browsing the thread, who puts on lt's and keeps the stock midpipe??

i've put headers on probably 6 cobras/lightnings/gt's and part of the kid is either a high flow midpipe or offroad pipe :2cents:
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top