travelers
Senior Member
The more tech and features cars get, the more I just want to daily a 1966 Ford Fairlane with a 390.
That would be more fun then some of the hi tech especially with a worked 390 with headers.
The more tech and features cars get, the more I just want to daily a 1966 Ford Fairlane with a 390.
The more tech and features cars get, the more I just want to daily a 1966 Ford Fairlane with a 390.
The more tech and features cars get, the more I just want to daily a 1966 Ford Fairlane with a 390.
Same here. I'd rather have a raw visceral experience...with air conditioning most of the time. Fast cars should be dangerous, on the edge of being under control, They shouldn't ask for your attention when you drive them, they should demand your attention and punish you for not paying attention.
Nothing is dangerous or raw about new cars.
Same here. I'd rather have a raw visceral experience...with air conditioning most of the time. Fast cars should be dangerous, on the edge of being under control, They shouldn't ask for your attention when you drive them, they should demand your attention and punish you for not paying attention.
Nothing is dangerous or raw about new cars.
Nothing is dangerous or raw about new cars.
Automatic. Every article I see says this car's an automatic:
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500: Dual-Clutch or 10-Speed Automatic? - Motor Trend https://apple.news/AIEauUi2aS0G4LU8h2Mcr2A
If they go with the dual clutch Getrag like what's in the Ford GT, not sure how much drag strip abuse it will take. As that trans is used to road racing loads not instant shock loads from drag racing. Now the 10speed auto that Ford and GM is in cahoots with and the abuse that Beefcake Racing and Lund is working on may be a better way to go. At the last NMRA I talked with Terrys guys and with Lund tuning the trans the trans is stone stock and it did a 9.26 not bad.
It would be interesting to see how the 10 speed automatic would perform, IF using paddle shifter's....on a road course.