Search results for query: *

Since they can only judge by looks alone, I agree with them too. The front end is not pretty or aggressive. And the backend looks like it came off of a different car. A lot of hype for a car that looks like a fusion/accord coupe. However, the interior looks great.

I have the Mcleod Clutch and aluminum flywheel. Love it.. It's actually very quiet. Once in a while you get a little noise at low RPM, but it's a very quiet noise. The clutch pedal effort is nice and light and very smooth too, although it grabs quicker than the stock clutch(like most aftermarket...

There was a guy on SVT forums that made 775rwhp with a BAP and ID1000's on E85. I'm thinking that with E85, you're gaining most of your power from ignition advance. So your engine is simply running more efficient, not requiring much more fuel.

The hoodline where it meets the headlights is definately different on the white rendering compared to the spy shot. I still think the front end is too disguised with all the different colors and tape lines on the spy shot to get a good feel on how the front end looks.

I've had 4 different Precision turbos on my Supra, 3 JB, 1 BB. Never had a problem. And when I pulled them off to sell them, none of them had any execcive shaft play. I personally feel that BB is a waist of money. Had 2 turbos nearly the same size, and the spool difference was not noticable...

No.. I hate the wantobe GT500 front end of the 2013.

Definately 2011+ 5.0. You have a 300 pound weight advantage and better handling. Also a better interior. Paxton supercharger + 5.0= 10 second car. And you can find a nicely modded 5.0 for mid to high $20k's

So that wasn't your car making 800+rwhp? I thought I remembered the car with the Coyote painting under the hood making that much power? Anyway, I will be at JPC tomorrow.

I think I remember seeing this car at the last JPC dyno contest. I believe it made just over 800rwhp before. Why does it have a new engine now?

Great numbers!! E85? Racegas?