STOCK Boss302 dyno grahps (Edmunds)

ArizonaGT

Road Course Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,248
Reaction score
3
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Lettuce discus


2012_mustang_r34_ford_2-thumb-717x477-79015.jpg


2012_mustang_whl_ford_1-thumb-717x477-79017.jpg


by josh jacquot | february 27, 2011

we barely let the engine cool after the drive down from monterey before rolling into md automotive in westminster, california and strapping the 2012 ford mustang boss 302 to its dynojet chassis dyno.

Ford claims the boss produces 444 hp at 7,500 rpm and 380 lb-ft of torque at 4,500 rpm -- a substantial horsepower gain over the stock 5.0 gt's 412 hp at 6,500 rpm and 390 lb-ft at 4,250 rpm. Ford reengineered just about every piece of the boss 302's engine so the gain should be substantial. And it is.

A careful look at the boss' power trace shows it making power all the way past redline. In fact, the fuel cut appears to be about 7,700 rpm -- an astonishing speed for a v8 this size. With coolant and oil temps stabilized, we saw three runs within five peak horsepower of one another. And when you're talking about 415 hp, that's pretty much dead consistent. The lines laid down right on top of each other.

But how big is the improvement relative to a 2011 ford mustang gt 5.0?

Big.

Ford claims a 32-hp difference between the peak output of these engines and we measured 36 hp. Perhaps more relevant is torque, which ford claims to be 10 lb-ft lower in the boss. Not according to our numbers. Sure, the torque peak comes 900 rpm later, but there are two more lb-ft to be had from the higher-revving engine. Of course, at 4,350 rpm, where the gt makes peak torque, the boss trails by about 11 lb-ft.

What the data doesn't tell you is how transformational a 900-rpm increase in peak power is between these two engines. At the gt's power peak of 6,650 rpm, the boss is alreay making 24 additional hp. And it continues over the next 900 rpm to pour on the coals and churn out another 12 hp.

boss-chart-1600-thumb-717x477-78997.jpg
Boss-chart-1600-thumb-717x477-78997.jpg


comparo-chart-boss-vs-GT-1600-thumb-717x520-78999.jpg


comparo-chart-boss-vs-gt-1600-thumb-717x520-78999.jpg


 
Last edited:

jsnyng

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Posts
982
Reaction score
4
Location
Alpharetta, GA
Those are pretty impressive numbers off the showroom floor. There are going to be some BMW drivers who are going to be butt hurt by the Boss.
 

cantdrive55

forum member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Posts
262
Reaction score
1
Location
San Diego-ish, CA
If you figure that the 5.0 makes an actual 412 at the crank, and 380 to the wheels, using the same drivetrain losses, that yields 451 to the crank for the BOSS. Impressive.
 

PBstallis

forum member
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Posts
213
Reaction score
0
If you figure that the 5.0 makes an actual 412 at the crank, and 380 to the wheels, using the same drivetrain losses, that yields 451 to the crank for the BOSS. Impressive.
i put 356 to the wheels, thats a ways away from 380
 

wbt

forum member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Posts
2,323
Reaction score
2
i put 356 to the wheels, thats a ways away from 380

Every dyno will read differently and we are probably looking at STD numbers. Edmunds has been notorious for posting "high" numbers.

That said, it is a neat comparison against a standard 5.0. Can't really find a negative with that as it was the same dyno albeit different conditions.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top