Just checked my build sheet, you are right.Incorrect.
The FR500S Rear Springs are 900-225-300.
Just sayin.
Just checked my build sheet, you are right.Incorrect.
The FR500S Rear Springs are 900-225-300.
Just sayin.
Mark has more experience with the GC's than I do but I agree. Not sure why everyone bashes them other than they expect the performance of a $3500 coilover set for $1700. I ran similar rates and the performance difference was great. Once I get to the point where I cant make up a single second on the track the high dollar ones may be the next step. I will also say that I am glad I had a year of track time on the stock suspension because it taught me how to handle and drive the car on the ragged edge to get every second out of it I could.You can buy a coilover kit for the Konis from Ground Control. Everyone hates them on here, but if you run them at a reasonable height in the front with a decent spring they work well. Ran them all year lowered about 1.25" with a 550/300 setup. The 550s are a bit too much spring for them, would go with a 500 spring max, 450 would probably be better. I also went down to a 250 out back. Rears have plenty of rebound damping front is lacking.
You don't have to drop 4k to make the car work. I obviously would prefer better dampers and eventually will run them, but guys all over run Konis and this is the only place where I seem to see outright hatred. Hell the Griggs setup are just Koni DAs, and so are the Cortexs. Although they may have different valving and shorter housings, they are just yellows.
This was supposed to be a low buck/low maintenance recreational thing...boy, am I stupid.
OMG!!! You're ME!!!
I run stiffer spring rates on the GC,but I run front full stiff and rear almost full soft. But, thats just what works for my style of driving. You may get in my car and say it drives like a turd. lol.
I don't run the rears at full stiff, but you will be near or at full stiff up front. It's a decent setup for a little over 400, and when you want to upgrade should be pretty easy to unload. At 1" lowering there is still adequate travel with the factory bumpstops up front, in the rear its close but I would just remove the very top of the bumpstop in the rear.
Sounds like we are more alike than not.
I always ran much stiffer front springs than my competition in the stock cars. My gut is telling me 500/300 but norm has me worried about having enough shock for the spring. I also always ran much lower roll centers than most. What I don't want though is any kind of push. Can't stand that. I'd rather be a shade loose and have to steer with the throttle than deal with a push. Neutral is nice with just a hint of oversteer is the ticket for me.
500/300 with sway bars that are close to stock in front to rear balance will be crazy loose. My car with -3.5* camber up front, square 315 Hoosiers, 35/22 bars and 550/300 rates was almost undriveable on a road course it was so loose. Worked really well on very tight corners and autocross but was really hard to put power down on corner exit. Very possible this has a lot to do with the lack of rebound damping from the Konis though. Having them revalved or going with a different damper.
Give it a shot, but I think you will want a bit less spring. The ride is pretty brutal with 300s out back too, much better with 250s. Think it is more about front to back spring balance in regards to ride. On my original 350/300 setup the car was brutal, ride actually improved with a switch to a stiffer front spring.
If you do go with a 300, go with an 8" spring. Can only go down a bit over an inch with a 9" spring.
so, 500/250 then? I have the FRPP 35/22 bars and Hankook Ventus Z214's.
I always ran at least a 250# spring split before so that makes sense.
I honestly think that would be a better starting point. Although 500 is really pushing it for yellows, I ran 550s and the world didn't come to an end. Will be having them revalved this winter though. Been so nice I've been driving the car so much or I would've had them done already!
kcbrown was able to get some shock plots off his own set, and I was looking in the 1 ips to 2 ips region. I don't think the comparisons would change much at 3 ips.
Roll damping involves vehicle track as well as wheel rate and gets more complicated than just adding wheel rates.
I *think* the bottom line tends to be that you can use a smaller % of critical damping in roll. There are some equations in Dixon's "Shock Absorber Handbook" dealing with this, that I haven't put any real time into trying to understand.
Norm
I wouldn't say 'crap'. It means that you can end up with a higher % of critical damping in pure roll than in pure ride for the same lb-sec/in dyno numbers. Sounds like a good thing to me.Crap....maybe I should just save up for the Vorshlag setup.
I wouldn't say 'crap'. It means that you can end up with a higher % of critical damping in pure roll than in pure ride for the same lb-sec/in dyno numbers. Sounds like a good thing to me.
Norm