DiMora's Build Thread

DiMora

More Is Better
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
971
Reaction score
41
Location
Fayetteville, GA
A 9.8:1 compression engine, at 18 PSI has an effective compression ratio of 21.8

My 11.5:1 compression engine, at 13 PSI has an effective compression ratio of 21.67

In other words, using the above numbers, cylinder pressures should be nearly identical.

So...I think I can run this setup at a boost not to exceed about 13 or 14 PSI and be safe...at 13 PSI I'll be making the same cylinder pressures as someone running a 9.8:1 engine with 18 PSI of boost.
 
Last edited:

Badd GT

forum member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Posts
753
Reaction score
365
Location
wake forest nc
I think it has to do with the 4032 piston material the Mahle has. The higher silicone content in the 4032 makes the piston more brittle and less mallable. That coupled with pump gas makes it susceptible to detonation. I relate this to concrete because I know construction, concrete has great compressive strength but no tensile strength, that's why it cracks. I think the silicone content in the Mahle gives it the same qualities. Mahle flat out told me not to run boost with their piston. Mahle 888-255-1942
 
Last edited:

thump_rrr

Senior Member
S197 Team Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Posts
2,250
Reaction score
45
Location
Montreal Qc,
I think it has to do with the 4032 piston material the Mahle has. The higher silicone content in the 4032 makes the piston more brittle and less mallable. That coupled with pump gas makes it susceptible to detonation. I relate this to concrete because I know construction, concrete has great compressive strength but no tensile strength, that's why it cracks. I think the silicone content in the Mahle gives it the same qualities. Mahle flat out told me not to run boost with their piston. Mahle 888-255-1942
That's funny coming from a company such as Mahle, known for being the OEM supplier of the pistons used in the Porsche 911 Turbo.
 

Badd GT

forum member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Posts
753
Reaction score
365
Location
wake forest nc
Mahle does make some pistons out of the 2618 material more suitable for boost/turbo these 3v pistons aren't. Wasn't worth the risk to me.
 

eighty6gt

forum member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Posts
4,299
Reaction score
405
New FRPP 5.3 designed to get hammered with boost has Mahle 4032 pistons. Also the 2013 GT500. Searched 4032 mahle, this guy ran 100,000 miles in his silverado.

"It ran different power levels throught its life with most of its time spent between 12-15 psi which would produce 7-800 flywheel hp. I had a valet switch on it that cut the boost to 5psi that I used when I towed my trailer or valet parked it. I would see 20psi once in awhile for fun on the streets and a couple times on Power Tour. It ran 11.4X on 19 psi at 5500 pounds at a Silverado SS meet here in Michigan around 2006-2007 I think, the engine was installed in 2002."

http://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/1317176-107-000-boosted-miles-comes-end.html
 
Last edited:

Badd GT

forum member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Posts
753
Reaction score
365
Location
wake forest nc
your correct on that ford 5.3 Eighty6gt. I don't claim to be the expert just passing on what I learned in my engine build. Unless brenspeed changed they put the 2618 in the B-326, and with what Mahle and Lito told me led to my decision.
 

Pentalab

forum member
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Posts
5,216
Reaction score
1,104
Check this out:

A 9.8:1 compression engine, at 18 PSI has an effective compression ratio of 21.8

My 11.5:1 compression engine, at 13 PSI has an effective compression ratio of 21.67

In other words, using the above numbers, cylinder pressures should be nearly identical.

So...I think I can run this setup at a boost not to exceed about 13 or 14 PSI and be safe...at 13 PSI I'll be making the same cylinder pressures as someone running a 9.8:1 engine with 18 PSI of boost.

## I see the FRPP aluminator can be had in either 9.5:1 CR, NA version...or 11:1 CR, blower version. Folks ( including roush) all use the 11:1 version..then use a blower. This is on the coyote eng.

The 2012+ ford focus uses 12:1 CR. Roush used just 8.5:1 CR on it's 540H + stage 3 cars + P51A/B etc.... + 15 psi boost. Roush was getting aprx 510 rwhp from it's 540h..with 281 ci + 15 psi.

These days folks are getting nearly 600 rwhp from the 11+ cars, with just a 82mm pulley, and 11:1 CR..and no where near 15 psi.

IMO, 11.5:1 or even 12:1 CR is ideal. 90% of the time the blower is not used, so the higher CR works good when in NA mode. Better to have 11:1 vs 8.5:1 CR.

In your example above, 11.5:1 vs 9.8:1..means 5 psi less boost required = less hp to run the blower, and a lot lower blower discharge temps ( pre-ic). Then just tweak the timing with the fuel used.
 

DiMora

More Is Better
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
971
Reaction score
41
Location
Fayetteville, GA
I concur, Jimbo. That's what I calculated...5 PSI less to make the same power...and out of boost the engine will be more efficient like when cruising on the highway.

The pistons look very well made. Nice and thick between the top and first ring (ring land)...another member on here sent me this photo of the same pistons (his are .020 over, but you get the idea):

IMG_8506-vi.jpg


I talked to my tuner tonight and he said he has no problem with tuning my setup...so it looks like I will proceed with building the short-block as-is.

TSS billet oil pump gears arrived today:

IMG_8536-vi.jpg


My biggest challenge will be finding time to build this thing, as work is keeping me busy and we will be moving soon. You may not see much action from me in this thread for a few months...but I'll slowly keep collecting parts as I see good deals.

My tuner and I discussed running E85...I might just put her on the corn.
 

swflastang05

Back for More
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Posts
2,098
Reaction score
121
Location
N. Ft. Myers, FL
I concur, Jimbo. That's what I calculated...5 PSI less to make the same power...and out of boost the engine will be more efficient like when cruising on the highway.

The pistons look very well made. Nice and thick between the top and first ring (ring land)...another member on here sent me this photo of the same pistons (his are .020 over, but you get the idea):

IMG_8506-vi.jpg


I talked to my tuner tonight and he said he has no problem with tuning my setup...so it looks like I will proceed with building the short-block as-is.

TSS billet oil pump gears arrived today:

IMG_8536-vi.jpg


My biggest challenge will be finding time to build this thing, as work is keeping me busy and we will be moving soon. You may not see much action from me in this thread for a few months...but I'll slowly keep collecting parts as I see good deals.

My tuner and I discussed running E85...I might just put her on the corn.

Good deal, put her on the corn, you won't regret it! I love my e85.
 

DiMora

More Is Better
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
971
Reaction score
41
Location
Fayetteville, GA
Mahle called back and told me these pistons are fine with boost. I told them 9-12 PSI is my target; they expressed fuel concerns beyond 9 PSI on pump gas, but running E85 would solve that issue.
 

Badd GT

forum member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Posts
753
Reaction score
365
Location
wake forest nc
e85 is a viable option,from what I understand. In and around Raleigh there is only 1 e85 station, and it is about 25 miles from my home so.......... not an option for me. Kind of messes up any kind of travel, or spontaneity I poked around on an e85 finder website and they (e85 stations) don't seem to be that plentiful. My shortblock wasn't together yet so it wasn't that inconvenient to change the pistons, and I didn't have to upgrade my fuel system for the e85
 

AutoXRacer

forum member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Posts
2,601
Reaction score
4
Location
Pacific Northwest
Mahle called back and told me these pistons are fine with boost. I told them 9-12 PSI is my target; they expressed fuel concerns beyond 9 PSI on pump gas, but running E85 would solve that issue.

Tell me more about what Mahle said about pump gas and 9psi.

I am now wondering if running 14 psi at 720wrhp is safe even though timing is highly conservative.
 

AutoXRacer

forum member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Posts
2,601
Reaction score
4
Location
Pacific Northwest
There is only one station locally... I like to do road trips in my car...so one E85 station won't do it for me... Lito is already talking about how we will lower the HP on the car. sigh :(
 

swflastang05

Back for More
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Posts
2,098
Reaction score
121
Location
N. Ft. Myers, FL
There is only one station locally... I like to do road trips in my car...so one E85 station won't do it for me... Lito is already talking about how we will lower the HP on the car. sigh :(

Yea that sucks! Well you can run e85 in town, then if on your trip there is no e85 you can always re-flash to a pump gas tune. That's my plan if ever needed.
 

DiMora

More Is Better
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
971
Reaction score
41
Location
Fayetteville, GA
I spent the whole afternoon sipping coffee and searching for threads on all the forums where guys have shared their CR / Boost / Timing and fuel choices...I think I'm onto something.

If you are boosted, chime in here so I can firm-up my theory:

http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=121142

Anyway, here is what I am thinking appears to be pretty standard trends:

  • A target effective CR of 18.5:1 is just about right on a modular forged engine - regardless of power adder.
  • A change of 1.0 units in compression ratio seems to equal the about a 3 PSI change in boost to maintain the same effective CR.
  • 93 Octane tunes usually run about 17 degrees of timing
  • E85 tunes usually run about 22-23 degrees of timing

Examples: 9.0:1 CR @ 15.5 PSI = Eff CR 18.49; 10.0:1 CR @ 12.5 PSI = Eff CR 18.5...you can see that is a 3 PSI difference.

Notes:

Effective Compression = ((Boost PSI / 14.7) + 1) * Current Static Compression Ratio
1 Bar = 14.5 PSI
1 Atmosphere = 14.7 PSI

Calculator here: http://www.gtsparkplugs.com/EffectiveCompressionCalc.html

So...I'm thinking that I should build this thing with the 11.5:1 compression, pulley it for 9 PSI and give it 17 degrees timing on 93 Octane...If I run E85 we simply bump the timing up to 23 degrees.

:crazy:
 

05stroker

Never enough power guy!
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Posts
13,058
Reaction score
77
Location
Bullard Tx.
I spent the whole afternoon sipping coffee and searching for threads on all the forums where guys have shared their CR / Boost / Timing and fuel choices...I think I'm onto something.

If you are boosted, chime in here so I can firm-up my theory:

http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=121142

Anyway, here is what I am thinking appears to be pretty standard trends:

  • A target effective CR of 18.5:1 is just about right on a modular forged engine - regardless of power adder.
  • A change of 1.0 units in compression ratio seems to equal the about a 3 PSI change in boost to maintain the same effective CR.
  • 93 Octane tunes usually run about 17 degrees of timing
  • E85 tunes usually run about 22-23 degrees of timing

Examples: 9.0:1 CR @ 15.5 PSI = Eff CR 18.49; 10.0:1 CR @ 12.5 PSI = Eff CR 18.5...you can see that is a 3 PSI difference.

Notes:

Effective Compression = ((Boost PSI / 14.7) + 1) * Current Static Compression Ratio
1 Bar = 14.5 PSI
1 Atmosphere = 14.7 PSI

Calculator here: http://www.gtsparkplugs.com/EffectiveCompressionCalc.html

So...I'm thinking that I should build this thing with the 11.5:1 compression, pulley it for 9 PSI and give it 17 degrees timing on 93 Octane...If I run E85 we simply bump the timing up to 23 degrees.

:crazy:
Sounds about right. Mine is 29.96 at 22 psi and 12:1 and would be the same as 9:1 and 33 psi. Lol
 

DiMora

More Is Better
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
971
Reaction score
41
Location
Fayetteville, GA
Tell me more about what Mahle said about pump gas and 9psi.

I am now wondering if running 14 psi at 720wrhp is safe even though timing is highly conservative.

They left me a voice-mail. I typed this as I played it...they said:

"On the M142 alloy...9 pounds of boost would be no issue, we have guys running up to 15 on that. Now the issue is the 11.5:1 with the 9 pounds of boost on gasoline...we do not recommend that high compression with that boost level...now if you're running alcohol, guys have been getting by with it on alcohol. Not sure what type of fuel you are using, bu the M142 alloy is definitely a good alloy - SuperCobraJets run that allow on all the parts we make for those guys and they are having good consistence with that."

I think that is a good, conservative approach for a manufacturer to take...and I may well just put this build on the corn...but the more I study this, the more I think I'll be fine with 93 octane and reasonable timing of 17 degrees or so maximum. My tuner can keep my knock sensors enabled, and I also have a Snow Performance Stage 3 meth system on the car I can leverage...maybe I'll buy the safe-injection module that dumps boost (opens bypass valve) if meth flow is not detected.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top