Accufab 85mm T body Test results (Real Deal) NA

[BLK2012GT]

i know the gains are great! but is it me or do the dyno #'s look a little low for his mods? maybe cuz of the dynojet?
eh who knows .. all i know is i would be in for the group buy.

wish the tranny wouldnt have broke =[

Those are also SAE numbers. Most people post dyno numbers are STD and they read a little higher. I got pretty much the same setup but with BBK longtube headers and minus the TB my car 425 rwhp SAE. If it was reading STD I would be in the 440 rwhp range.

 

[NealAtTheWheel]

Any updates on this?

 

[levelbelow2000]

Any updates on this?

should have some numbers next week

 

[mbreinin]

Subscribed for updates on stock intake and track times. This is an expensive piece. I am interested, but I have to see numbers.

 

[BPatterson]

In for results.

 

[apd252]

sub for results

 

[ViciousJay]

Put the car on the roller today to prepare the car for florida. Made a few pulls and then swapped to the new 85mm T body from Accufab. I was expecting 5hp at most and would of been happy with that.

So withen 10 mins I made the pull with the T body (no changes made to the tune). Red line is the after results. The mid range pick up is insane and the torque shot up even with the boss intake I was shocked.

Very happy with the results, this is a major game changer for the boss intake users worried about what they lost in the low / mid range. We are talking 20hp mid range and just over 20 flbs of trq!

ummm your tune is looking a bit on the aggressive side as far as the A/F goes. You probably made 5hp extra max. Id take care of that tune before bolting anything else on your ride

 

[carbd86gt]

ummm your tune is looking a bit on the aggressive side as far as the A/F goes. You probably made 5hp extra max. Id take care of that tune before bolting anything else on your ride

What's wrong with the AFR? It's a N/A car, mid high 12's is perfectly fine.

 

[mr. anderson]

yup, N/A tunes with e10 gas should be good to the 13.5 region, if anything he could lean it out a little.

 

[zachcrosen]

Any updates on this?

Damn Neal! Car looks good. Take a look at the Eibach/Roush lowering springs for sale from Roushoverstock for $125 shipped!

Sorry for being off topic....but free bump for additional numbers!

 

[Rob72]

What's wrong with the AFR? It's a N/A car, mid high 12's is perfectly fine.

I've been hearing .85 lamba or 12.4 stoic on gasoline reading from the factory wide bands.

 

[BAKnBLK2010]

yup, N/A tunes with e10 gas should be good to the 13.5 region, if anything he could lean it out a little.

Ummmm NO. 13.0 or leaner would be just plain stupid on the Coyote motor. These motors don't benefit from the leaner a/f ratios like the 4.6's did.

 

[ViciousJay]

I've been hearing .85 lamba or 12.4 stoic on gasoline reading from the factory wide bands.

same here if not a bit lower, when i was datalogging it was .84xxxxx

 

[onebadgsx]

correct .84 to .85 lamda. dont worry about a/f readings since they are all conversions, it changes depending on the fuel

 

[Ivan 5.0]

Subscribed for updates on stock intake and track times. This is an expensive piece. I am interested, but I have to see numbers.

Any updates?

 

[faztcobra]

Any updates?

It's been over a month now, I guess this topic is

 

[86merc]

Subscribing for results and just in case a group buy breaks out. haha

 

[lxmatt]

Group buy I am in for that

 

[KalEl370]

Me too!

 

[Full_Tilt]

ummm your tune is looking a bit on the aggressive side as far as the A/F goes. You probably made 5hp extra max. Id take care of that tune before bolting anything else on your ride

Is this a joke or do you think its 1973 still?