Swapping Navigator 5.4 DOHC in S197

06silverbullet

forum member
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Posts
3,914
Reaction score
1
Location
orange county, ca
silly thing popped into my head, now the older 4.6 2v/4v used the same heads now i know you can't use the 3v heads on the older 4.6's without a lot of modifications, i'd assume this would be the same for the 5.4' 4v's
 

Kuro!

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
18
Location
Austin, TX
Bringing this thread back up because I want to make this happen...

Talking to Tanner today and he brought up the fact that a stock 3V harness could potentially be able to run this, does anyone have confirmation if there are any additional sensors on the 4V motors?
 

Natural1

all around duguder
S197 Team Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Posts
2,164
Reaction score
54
Location
Angleton, TX
Bringing this thread back up because I want to make this happen...

Talking to Tanner today and he brought up the fact that a stock 3V harness could potentially be able to run this, does anyone have confirmation if there are any additional sensors on the 4V motors?
It will run it. It's really just a head swap, that uses the same sensors.. Remember our discussion?
 

Kuro!

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
18
Location
Austin, TX
It will run it. It's really just a head swap, that uses the same sensors.. Remember our discussion?

Yes Tanner, I do lol. PS: In the thread lightblade linked the guy had to add an extra cam position sensor...

Trying to figure out the intake manifold situation.
 
Last edited:

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
197
Location
Virginia Beach
Yes Tanner, I do lol. PS: In the thread lightblade linked the guy had to add an extra cam position sensor...

Trying to figure out the intake manifold situation.


Yup no way around that really since there are 2 more cams.

I think jpc make a 5.4 manifold.
 

Kuro!

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
18
Location
Austin, TX
Yup no way around that really since there are 2 more cams.

I think jpc make a 5.4 manifold.

Already have a JPC 5.4 3V manifold, I would most likely do the Reichard racing plates and a 4.6 4V manifold. Spent about an hour and a half bullshitting with Tanner on the phone and learned a lot, but still don't know which manifold I should go with.
 

Mach1Marauder

LARGE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Posts
666
Reaction score
1
Location
Phoenix, DFW or a trailer at the track

Natural1

all around duguder
S197 Team Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Posts
2,164
Reaction score
54
Location
Angleton, TX
I guess you know better than Mike Bowen and I.. Interestingly enough the GT500 doesn't have 2 sensors and it runs off the same PCM with a different strategy.. That tells me that the PCM is capable of running the coils and the single sensor. If I had my laptop (sct-adviii) in front of me, I'd tell you exactly how to do it.
 

Mach1Marauder

LARGE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Posts
666
Reaction score
1
Location
Phoenix, DFW or a trailer at the track
I guess you know better than Mike Bowen and I.. Interestingly enough the GT500 doesn't have 2 sensors and it runs off the same PCM with a different strategy.. That tells me that the PCM is capable of running the coils and the single sensor. If I had my laptop (sct-adviii) in front of me, I'd tell you exactly how to do it.
So, what did you do with the other cam sensor?
We all can wait until Tuesday. :beer:
 

Kuro!

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
18
Location
Austin, TX
Tanner, so what you were saying was that the PCM would be unable to use one sensor with both tapped in because they PCM thinks they are in different locations at different times?
 
Last edited:

Natural1

all around duguder
S197 Team Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Posts
2,164
Reaction score
54
Location
Angleton, TX
So here's the deal.. I still believe it can be done with one sensor. From what I can tell, the PCM uses one sensor to monitor cam position for actual engine operation, like the 4V does. It also uses the same sensor to monitor and adjust the VCT for that same bank. The other sensor seems to be used only for its respective VCT operation. It's possible that it uses and adjusts for both banks for not only the VCT but everything else as well. If that's the case, then it would pose a definite challenge but is not impossible by any means. Like I said, I'm positive it can be done and the PCM could run it this way but I don't own an IDS/VCM. I will have to agree that adding the other sensor to the sensorless bank on the 4V would (no doubt) be easier.
 

Kuro!

Banned
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
18
Location
Austin, TX
Mach1, is the coolant head temp sensor still located in the same place on the 4V heads?
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top