SSPSTANGBANGER
LSx Slayer
I saw a gain on dyno from a 4.5" CAI to the Rev Auto 5" CAI. I also run the twin 65MM as per Lund's suggestion because of the dead spot on the mono-blade and the twin 65mm is plenty big enough for the engine and intake to flow even with my cams and longtubes.
With Rev Auto CAI and twin 65mm my car made over 470rwhp thru auto with 5,000 stall.
The gains of the larger CAI are only above 5K RPM. FYI there was a test in 5.0 or MM&FF of the PBH 4.5" VS the FRPP 4" and they gained power with the PBH 4.5" CAI.
I see exact same IAT's in Texas heat with the plastic CAI tube that I see now with my mild steel Rev Auto CAI.
One thing we learned in engine school was the was air bends in front of a t-body can make big effects on the power at the wheels. This is why a N/A car can gain from a larger tube because the bends don't effect the air-flow as much because it over-flows the needs and doesn't really get restriction from the bends.
With Rev Auto CAI and twin 65mm my car made over 470rwhp thru auto with 5,000 stall.
The gains of the larger CAI are only above 5K RPM. FYI there was a test in 5.0 or MM&FF of the PBH 4.5" VS the FRPP 4" and they gained power with the PBH 4.5" CAI.
I see exact same IAT's in Texas heat with the plastic CAI tube that I see now with my mild steel Rev Auto CAI.
One thing we learned in engine school was the was air bends in front of a t-body can make big effects on the power at the wheels. This is why a N/A car can gain from a larger tube because the bends don't effect the air-flow as much because it over-flows the needs and doesn't really get restriction from the bends.