Just throwing it out there, when I recently designed our new "handling" specific springs for the GT and GT500's, I catered them around the Koni and Bilstein stock replacement dampers. (and of course our supporting mods)
I found that on the GT's with the Koni Yellows that the 240-260lb/in range FRONT and 200-220lb/in range REAR was the highest I felt comfortable with. Higher Linear rates and I literally felt that the control of the car went south (not on slicks)
On the Bilsteins that come on the 13/14 GT500s....I found it to be a little similar....with the Bilsteins and heavier front end seeming to work slightly better with a little higher rates.
I had not maximum rates in mind when I developed them. I did have a minimum of 200 F and/or R....and just worked up to over 300lb/in.
I basically set out to offer a set of Linear springs that I felt were towards the top of the useable range for most of our customers with "off the shelf" SA dampers - as that is what we cater to the most. I ended up with 240F/200R for the GT....and 260F/220R for the GT500.
Interestingly enough, the 13/14 GT500 Track Pack cars come stock with a 260lb/in Linear front spring (and 200~R)
My personal experience is this. Anything over those rates, my comfort level while controlling the car went down. And also, when we have tested various "progressive" springs recently, and in the past, the "working range" or rates that we concluded to be used during operation, on average, were quite a bit less than the peak #s they advertise.
In closing, I am a huge fan of Linear spring rates. I personally do not like a progressive rate spring.
Good luck!