MW slow paced? What are you smoking?
I've played both, and BF2 was way slower than MW2.
Also, more realistic guns? I didn't know the Barrett .50 cal was still a single shot 5 round gun in 2005.... Really realistic.
Do you know how easy it is to snipe in BF2? In MW1, 2 and 3, when aiming, the scope actually moves around like a person holding the rifle would do. BF2, no sir, the scope is perfectly still. Here's another fine example. I've shot people mid range with a barrett .50 cal, in the chest, and upper torso, guess what, they don't die. I've yet to shoot someone in the chest or face with any kind of sniper rifle in the MW series and the person living to shoot my ass back.
Vehicles are cool, but get boring. The maps in MW3 open? Dude, WTF! They are mainly buildings and villages, etc. Sniping is incredibly difficult and camping is even more challenging. It takes 5 minutes on foot to get from one side of a map in BF2. Not to mention, majority of the people are snipers.
I know you are in the army, so tell me this. How does one in BF2 come in close proximity with a Heli attack shooting missles, and lives? Yet, in MW3, if you are near an explosion, it's basically instant death...
Both are good games, but I think you are a little too biased in your comment man.