Tuning question - Can more power really be made without adjusting timing?

Bmr4life

2005 GT
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Posts
1,147
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta
I know some tuners were originally adjusting the timing and knock sensor values in the beginning, with pretty much all of them leaving knock setting stock now. Are any of them leaving the factory timing in place also?
 

beefcake

Forced Induction Specialist
Official Vendor
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
23
Location
Bethel, Ohio
the majority of your power i would say would come from timing and fuel.

As far as knock sensor settings. I think it's good to have those settings working full tilt.

Without more timing, I can't see drastic gains, unless there is a huge amount of power to come with vct
 
Last edited:

Rob72

No Japanese Mustang Here
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Posts
3,049
Reaction score
0
Location
Baltimore, Marxland
I too was wondering about what % of additional power(or amount) came from the timing increase and what additional power came from the cai and fuel increase in the tune.
 

JDos1

forum member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Posts
186
Reaction score
0
Location
Greenville/Lancaster, SC
Doesn't that TSB that Ford released say that monkeying either Knock sensors OR Timing would void warranty?

Don't quote me on that and no one get their britches in a bind just because I brought this up.
 

Bmr4life

2005 GT
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Posts
1,147
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta
Doesn't that TSB that Ford released say that monkeying either Knock sensors OR Timing would void warranty?

Don't quote me on that and no one get their britches in a bind just because I brought this up.

Not to be rude, but you can keep that conversation out of this thread.


So I talked to BAMA earlier today and they said that most of their gains do come from adjusting timing. I was thinking about having my street tune programmed with stock timing so it would be a safe tune, but if its performance is going to suck I probably would never run it anyway.
 

Rob72

No Japanese Mustang Here
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Posts
3,049
Reaction score
0
Location
Baltimore, Marxland
He can adjust the shifting and throttle response. That will make a noticeable difference. That way you can have a "safe" summer race tune.
 

BAKnBLK2010

Harley Davidson FLHTCI
Joined
May 12, 2010
Posts
3,280
Reaction score
8
Location
Sandy Hook Kentucky
I am of the opinion that you don't gain much peak HP from any of these n/a tunes. Maybe 10hp and probably more like 5hp from tune only. The biggest benefit from having a tune on one of these cars is getting rid of most of the torque management on the auto's and manual cars along with better shifting on the auto cars. People get way too hung up on dyno numbers when in reality the dyno is a tool to measure what the car actually benifits from performance wise. These cars pick up roughly 1/2 a second in the quarter mile from a tune only. Do you really think a tune only car picks up 50hp with just the tune? Something to think about.
 

Rob72

No Japanese Mustang Here
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Posts
3,049
Reaction score
0
Location
Baltimore, Marxland
Dyno numbers are all over the place on these cars. These cars all seem to run around 5 mph on the 1/4 with just a cai and a tune.
 

Bmr4life

2005 GT
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Posts
1,147
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta
I am of the opinion that you don't gain much peak HP from any of these n/a tunes. Maybe 10hp and probably more like 5hp from tune only. The biggest benefit from having a tune on one of these cars is getting rid of most of the torque management on the auto's and manual cars along with better shifting on the auto cars. People get way too hung up on dyno numbers when in reality the dyno is a tool to measure what the car actually benifits from performance wise. These cars pick up roughly 1/2 a second in the quarter mile from a tune only. Do you really think a tune only car picks up 50hp with just the tune? Something to think about.

I partly disagree with you. While peak numbers may be only slightly higher, the power under the curve is greater the entire time. Tunes make a fantastic difference. There is no questioning that.
 

wbt

forum member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Posts
2,323
Reaction score
2
the majority of your timing i would say would come from timing and fuel.

As far as knock sensor settings. I think it's good to have those settings working full tilt.

Without more timing, I can't see drastic gains, unless there is a huge amount of power to come with vct

Wow...what an insightful observation. Timing comes from timing...no shit. Stick to the driving and let us peons do the wrenching......

I am of the opinion that you don't gain much peak HP from any of these n/a tunes. Maybe 10hp and probably more like 5hp from tune only. The biggest benefit from having a tune on one of these cars is getting rid of most of the torque management on the auto's and manual cars along with better shifting on the auto cars. People get way too hung up on dyno numbers when in reality the dyno is a tool to measure what the car actually benifits from performance wise. These cars pick up roughly 1/2 a second in the quarter mile from a tune only. Do you really think a tune only car picks up 50hp with just the tune? Something to think about.

I agree 100%. I witnessed .7 and 2 MPH gain on a stock manual trans 2011 GT the same night, same track with nothing more than a tune. It didn't pick up 70 HP but the tq nanny wasn't interfering anymore. With some added ignition timing and cam changes, along.with disabling tq managememt, we saw some outstanding gains. :)
 

Wnt2gofst

Banned
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Posts
3,076
Reaction score
2
Location
Columbus GA
I agree 100%. I witnessed .7 and 2 MPH gain on a stock manual trans 2011 GT the same night, same track with nothing more than a tune. It didn't pick up 70 HP but the tq nanny wasn't interfering anymore. With some added ignition timing and cam changes, along.with disabling tq managememt, we saw some outstanding gains. :)
Seen it with my own eyes. The guy was stoked. Couldn't believe the tune alone did this. Guy was on stock tires as well. Hell I couldn't believe with a tune only he dropped .7 off of the car.
 
Last edited:

beefcake

Forced Induction Specialist
Official Vendor
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
23
Location
Bethel, Ohio
Wow...what an insightful observation. Timing comes from timing...no shit. Stick to the driving and let us peons do the wrenching......

Wow, aren't you brilliant.

I'm sure most people with common sense understood that to be power.
 

beefcake

Forced Induction Specialist
Official Vendor
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
23
Location
Bethel, Ohio
Seen that thread before. Seems to much advertising. Looking for other opinions.

Even if you wanted to keep the timing the same. Just the drivability , like the throttle response and such, is soo much better with a tune.

I don't know why these cars are so unresponsive from the factory.
 

SD07GT

forum member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Posts
728
Reaction score
2
Even if you wanted to keep the timing the same. Just the drivability , like the throttle response and such, is soo much better with a tune.

I don't know why these cars are so unresponsive from the factory.

Ford does it best not to kill the morons that will be driving the 5.0....they want repeat customers :crazy:
 

Bad500chris

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Posts
40
Reaction score
0
Even if you wanted to keep the timing the same. Just the drivability , like the throttle response and such, is soo much better with a tune.

I don't know why these cars are so unresponsive from the factory.

Correct and ford makes them less responsive because they know the cars go to a whole range of different people. Everything from your 75 year old grandmother to a 16 year old just-got-my-license kid.
They don't want you to just tap the gas and get a huge amount of horsepower.
 

Black 5.0

forum member
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Posts
243
Reaction score
0
Correct and ford makes them less responsive because they know the cars go to a whole range of different people. Everything from your 75 year old grandmother to a 16 year old just-got-my-license kid.
They don't want you to just tap the gas and get a huge amount of horsepower.

Hey now, I resemble that remark!:beerdrink: Or at least I fall in that age group, perhaps in the upper...upper range, however, as far as throttle response, when I got my car, I was happy with the way it worked. Under normal driving conditions, it was tame so to speak. However, when you slammed the pedal, it acted like old school carburetion; opening up the secondaries like a carb sitting on top of a monster engine. It was cool!

I now have a tune on my car from a SC Cortex 1950 which is the performance tune. It is the 91 octane tune they provide. I use this because we don't have 93 octane here, we have 92 octane. Fine by me. There is a lot of different pluses that go along with a tune that are advantages which have been duely noted. Others include having the ability to adjust the radiator fan, turn skip shift off and datalogging using the hand held tuner. I am awaiting the app from SC to be able to read the data on my computer. I then should be able to monitor what my engine does under various driving conditions. Should be very helpful. :thumb:
 

Seer

forum member
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Posts
6,516
Reaction score
1
Even if you wanted to keep the timing the same. Just the drivability , like the throttle response and such, is soo much better with a tune.

I don't know why these cars are so unresponsive from the factory.


drive by wire parameters are neutered stock, thats why.

Have you ever played around with those parameters before. It's kind've fun being able to set the throttle to say 10% even with the foot slammed on the gas.

Or torque availability %'s
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top