Supercharge your GT or Cobra?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grabber

Coyote Snob Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
1,962
Reaction score
2
Location
Wheeling, IL


The site I was looking at said different.

Regardless, that is a lot of work just to out-do a Factory motor. For half the cost, you can take the already built Cobra motor, and beef certain parts up, and match/surpass this Aluminator.

This can keep going. You can buy a Cobra for less, with similar or less miles than a GT, drop 1-2K into it, and have a solid 11 second car, and a great overall car.

Not dissing the 3V, but, for the money people pay for not just the car, but for the modifications, if you want to go fast, you can go fast for cheaper compared to the 3V, and still look good.
 

Riptide

Will work for Mustang.
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
17
Location
Montucky
Yes the 3v is an expensive car to make fast. You already know my thoughts on this subject. I was just trying to get the facts straight about the rods in that shortblock. ;)
 

stkjock

---- Madmin ----
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Posts
40,276
Reaction score
3,190
Location
Long Island NY
Sure, if you like spending 10K on the motor. Also, the Aluminator is not built like the Cobra motor. The Rods are not forged.

Not to mention, the Motor is about 6K, and the trans is about 3K. Now, since not everyone can install and rip out an old motor, have fun paying another 2k to installed the motor, trans, tune the car, change out all other parts, etc. That is why.

I paid 21K for my car, of which there are only 365 of them around, and I have only put 1200 or so in mods. Oh, and it only has 25K miles, after 7 long years, and the body and motor is mint.

Terminators have been proven time and time again. Without heavy, and I mean heavy modification, the GT is on a lower platform. No offense, but, that is a fact. I am sure some of you will argue, because you think slapping a blower on makes the GT better. Good luck getting your GT past 500 RWHP safely. I can go to 700 RWHP without having to go through the heartache of swapping motors, building the current motor up, etc.

Chris - FYI Aluminator uses Manley Rons and can be had now for 3200 shipped.

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=10374

  • Fits 2005-2009 Mustang GT
  • Forged steel 8-bolt crankshaft
  • Forged steel H-beam connecting rods
  • Forged aluminum 16cc dish 3 valve pistons
  • New oil pump
  • Uses M-6010-A46NA block, knock sensors are not removed from the block
  • Approximately 8.7:1 compression ratio when used with 50.3cc 3 valve heads
  • Lower compression for supercharged applications
  • Built with all NEW PARTS
  • Will accept 3V cylinder heads
  • Will not work with 2V or 4V cylinder heads
  • 8-bolt flywheel required (not included)
 

Chrome61

forum member
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Posts
677
Reaction score
6
Location
Grover,NC
I was the first one to respond to the OP, but I need to clear something up, If ford didn't come out with the S-197 I would still own two camaros. Not dissing anyones choice of rides but that's just me.
 

Grabber

Coyote Snob Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
1,962
Reaction score
2
Location
Wheeling, IL
The Shortblock is 3300 bucks, however, the Actual Aluminator motor this guy mentioned, the Longblock, is 5600 bucks. Big difference. :D
 

Vapour Trails

The Renaissance Man
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Posts
2,773
Reaction score
40
Location
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
I'd supercharge an 05+ anyday over a Cobra.

The cobra chassis is antiquated, it's heavy, has a rather poor IRS system, and a small inefficient blower. At the same boost level I don't really see a lot of evidence that the 4V holds a power advantage.

Yes, the Cobra has a stronger engine, but for $3500 you can buy a 3V shortblock that is just as strong (and lighter). Heck, I just bought one.
 
Last edited:

Grabber

Coyote Snob Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
1,962
Reaction score
2
Location
Wheeling, IL
I'd supercharge an 05+ anyday over a Cobra.

The cobra chassis is antiquated, it's heavy, has a rather poor IRS system, and a small inefficient blower. At the same boost level I don't really see a lot of evidence that the 4V holds a power advantage.

Yes, the Cobra has a stronger engine, but for $3500 you can buy a 3V shortblock that is just as strong (and lighter).


I will let this go. You know exactly what you are saying.

Yeah, for 3300 bucks, I can put a whipple on, and make over 600 RWHP, and have a way faster car. Chassis are antiques? ROFL

It's also been proven, on the same boost, the 4V on the Cobra's will make a bit more power. More flow = more power.

But, ok. Take it from a guy that doesn't own a Cobra, and his biased opinion.
 

stkjock

---- Madmin ----
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Posts
40,276
Reaction score
3,190
Location
Long Island NY
The Shortblock is 3300 bucks, however, the Actual Aluminator motor this guy mentioned, the Longblock, is 5600 bucks. Big difference. :D


ahh, IMHO no need for the long block, you can easily see 600+whp on stock heads and cams
 

Grabber

Coyote Snob Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
1,962
Reaction score
2
Location
Wheeling, IL
ahh, IMHO no need for the long block, you can easily see 600+whp on stock heads and cams


I don't agree that the heads can handle that much HP. The Valves themselves will give out around 550 RWHP.

That's my opinion, but, it's backed by the fact that it has happened to a lot of people pushing 500+ RWHP. But, what do I know. I drive a slow antique.
 

onequicktang

forum member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Posts
1,194
Reaction score
0
Location
Orion, MI
im with grabber on this. I see what he is saying. buy an 03-04 cobra for 20000+ which is prob what you would pay for a newer low mileage s197. put a 4000 blower on the cobra and you can have 700 hp. put 4000 into an s197 and you have a nice motor ready for boost at 320 hp. But both cars have there pros and cons and its not really an arguable topic as everyone is going to have a different opinion on each car.
 

stang03

forum member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Posts
377
Reaction score
0
I think the Cobra is much easier to mod and can hold more with less effort
 

Riptide

Will work for Mustang.
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
17
Location
Montucky
I've always been under the impression the rods were the weak link w/regard to the stock setup.

So people with an aluminator but otherwise stock setup have ticking time bombs on their hands over 550whp?
 

Vapour Trails

The Renaissance Man
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Posts
2,773
Reaction score
40
Location
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
I will let this go. You know exactly what you are saying.

Yeah, for 3300 bucks, I can put a whipple on, and make over 600 RWHP, and have a way faster car. Chassis are antiques? ROFL

It's also been proven, on the same boost, the 4V on the Cobra's will make a bit more power. More flow = more power.

But, ok. Take it from a guy that doesn't own a Cobra, and his biased opinion.

For the same money I too can make 600 whp in a lighter, more compact package. So what? You've got this idea that swapping a engine is this massively expensive, complicated thing..it isn't.

Once the internals are the same, the only difference is the heads. The 4V heads enjoy a very marginal advantage over heads with one less valve. I think that says a lot about the strides Ford made in design (two cams and 4 valves barely beat one cam and 3 valves).

All Mustangs from 1979-2004 are based on the same platform, and it is antiquated, not to mention weak and flexible.

I don't have to own a Cobra to know that aluminum blocks are better than iron blocks, that well thought out solid axle suspension is lighter and stonger than an expensive and breakable IRS, that chassis stiffeness is a good thing, and inside and out the S197 is more visually appealing.

The only thing from the Cobra I wouldn't mind is the tranmission, bent nail shifter and all.
 

stkjock

---- Madmin ----
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Posts
40,276
Reaction score
3,190
Location
Long Island NY
I don't agree that the heads can handle that much HP. The Valves themselves will give out around 550 RWHP.

That's my opinion, but, it's backed by the fact that it has happened to a lot of people pushing 500+ RWHP. But, what do I know. I drive a slow antique.

Our own psfracer ran his car to 10.13 @ 133 with 604 rwhp, IIRC he only upgraded the springs.


btw Chris - I'm not disagreeing that a Termi is a better starting point to make big power.... :cheers:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top