Phenolic has been used for decades for carb spacers. I've run them. They don't absorb water. There may be slightly better materials but phenolic certainly works at a reasonable cost.
https://www.speedwaymotors.com/Moro...MI18SSt5DK2QIVR57ACh3zvgr-EAQYAiABEgJbUfD_BwE
Plus according to this CTS-V guy who actually tested phenolic spacers, they don't help. He saw a 20 F decrease in temps at the manifold base by the heads but this did not lower the iat's.
http://www.ctsvowners.com/forum/71-cooling/29823-phenolic-spacers-before-after-test-results.html
Lastly, even knowing this, I did put down a deposit and planned on buying them. I just didn't expect a huge improvement.
Did you slog through ALL of the 162 postings, strewn over the 6 pages on that CTS-V forum ?
Go to page 5, posting #129... the maker of the spacers spells out the real facts. He also provides for several other heat shields, and V block shields, plus some other items. He's claiming another 30 rwhp on dyno testing.
In the DOB / Aussie mustang phenolic spacer scenario, the spacer goes between the top of the AL manifold and the bottom of the PD blower casing. To really do this right, you require a pair of additional spacers, one between the top of each head and bottom of manifold interface.. + some type of heat shield so the bottom of the al manifold doesn't pick up heat from the Block V. In the case of the Roush al manifolds, you still have this problem with the built in, integral eng coolant crossover, across the front of the al manifold. That constant flow of hot coolant just cooks the al manifold. Then the manifold is also getting heated by each head. The manifold is getting cooked a 4th time by the hot blower casing (with blower on).
My little M90 with it's 5.8 psi boost runs just fine, IAT's are not an issue..(like 120 F cruising..and 105 F at higher rpms). IAT's drop 10-15 F with blower on. Just cruising around town or on the hwy in OD, say 1.5 krpm @ 50 mph, the air is flowing relatively slowly..and picks up a lot of heat from the hot al manifold. Drop down a gear or two, and /or slowly put your foot into it, rpm increases a bunch, and now the airflow is a lot faster, and less time spent in the hot manifold. The air has less time to pick up heat..and IAT's drop a bunch. 0-100 mph or say 50-100 mph goes by pretty damned quick, so the blower is never on for more than 5-10 secs at a time. I typ see 120 F for IAT's, regardless of outside temps, it's 118 F when outside temps are 40F....and 120F when outside temps are 80 F. Coolant in IC-pump-HE loop is flowing all the time. Coolant runs cool when cruising, and recovers very quickly after using the blower..like luke warm..then back to cool.
The real problems start when I drive across town on a hot day, then park it for 30-45 mins in the hot sun, or even in the shade. Lift the hood and feel the top of the blower casing, and it's stupid hot...(eng still OFF) Start eng up, and IAT's can hit 145 F...(the highest I have recorded). But that quickly drops to 139 F, within 20 secs. Then down to aprx 130-132 F, after driving 2-3 blocks. Then it takes a helluva long time to get from 130-132 F..down to it's normal 120 F... like 20-40 mins. The heat soak effect on a parked car, with the typ oem PD blower setup is well pronounced. The proposed spacer between blower + manifold, I believe would alleviate a lot of the blower casing heat soak issues.
For strip use, if waiting the typ 20-45 mins b4 doing another run, the heat soak would kill the timing. Spacers would help...and so would ice. Ice is cheap and simple solution. Water / meth sprayed into the elbow of the blower also works..and cools elbow, intake air, blower casing, rotor pack, and blower discharge outlet air temps.