You would think there would be a law suit on that one considering it doesn't even run.
Its the owners car. But yes false advertising, he has gained business because of the car
You would think there would be a law suit on that one considering it doesn't even run.
So, does that mean, " crazy ass cracker" does not mean a rapist?well...he's right up there with Piers Morgan at being a complete dumbass.
Welcome to the party guys lol, quite possibly the funniest thread on the internet WITH responses from D. Wiggs himself. What a joke.
http://www.luxury4play.com/lamborghini/112016-2000hp-murcie-sv.html
Welcome to the party guys lol, quite possibly the funniest thread on the internet WITH responses from D. Wiggs himself. What a joke.
http://www.luxury4play.com/lamborghini/112016-2000hp-murcie-sv.html
Nope seer upgraded to a 13 front end and forgestar wheels
CTD is the laughing stock of the L4P forums.
Seer- I am sorry to hear about your car and I hope that everything gets resolved in your favor. You should post up your story over on the L4P forums (the one I linked). They would be interested to hear it.
Car didn't have a dead cyl
Just low compression in #7
Yep, ugly close up, when we use borescopes at work they make imperfections look all that more bad. If the drywall screw head was removed and the engine buttoned back up, it would run, might not look so great on a leak down or maybe it would. In regards to litigation it would be tough to prove who is responsible for the damage, Jason supplied the parts, the shop assembled the block, how do you prove who did what? The only one that wins in the end are the lawyers.