Sam Strano
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Posts
- 918
- Reaction score
- 6
*sigh* I wasn't punching anyone in the face. But this is the internet, and the most frustrating thing for me is when things get posted like "this is great, and that rocks" without any sense of context. If we are talking about setting up a car, I'm sorry that I think details like speed (because I assume that is point of the mods), matter. Am I wrong?
Cars behave differently at the limit than under it. A stock Mustang cruises down the road pretty well the way Ford built it. We change them to make them do things better. The harder you drive them, the more you push them, the more things get stressed and the more precisely things have to work, and the more small details start to matter.
Also, the classing... like it or not Sky has mods that put him in a class that the car isn't competitive. It that's ok with him, that's fine, but it should be pointed out because it might not be ok with everyone. Not to mention I don't have those mods on my cars, and the cars were PLENTY fast.
I'm a nice guy. I offered Sky (who's name is Vince) a ride so he could see what it was like, and whether or not he will admit it here, he was pretty surprised by what was going on in that car, and also surprised when I answered his question about how fast can a Mustang go by telling him an ESP car will run Super Stock (the class car he was riding in) speeds.
Maybe I'm nuts to think that this sort of information matters. If I am, I apologize. But let's flip this coin over. Sky writes articles for an online magazine. Whiteline is being very aggressive about their stuff, and I'm quite sure there is a connection. I'm not saying he's fibbing or anything, he might well like the stuff fine. But what basis for comparison is there? That's my issue, and while many might not like it, I am free to have that opinion and I can usually back up my opinions of what works and what doesn't pretty well though results.
Two guys can squabble for a year, it's he said/he said. How do you pick a winner? I think that the proof is in pudding, so to speak. Results prove how things work, that's why I choose to compete, at a high level to make myself, and my setups, better. I don't know what other way there is to prove anything, and I'm not ok with empty words which is what the internet is filled with.
That's all. I know it's blunt, and I don't tend to dance around this stuff. I work hard for my money, and I know you guys do too. I have NEVER run a comped part that I was testing and evaluating because I wanted to the parts to stand on their own. I also don't comp. parts to magazines. GM High Tech Performance did a car back in 2007 with my stuff, because the Editor wanted my stuff and he wrote an article about it afterwards with his opinions. He loved it, car went a crapload faster on track and he daily drove it across NYC. But that opinion didn't show because I gave him the parts, because I didn't.
Cars behave differently at the limit than under it. A stock Mustang cruises down the road pretty well the way Ford built it. We change them to make them do things better. The harder you drive them, the more you push them, the more things get stressed and the more precisely things have to work, and the more small details start to matter.
Also, the classing... like it or not Sky has mods that put him in a class that the car isn't competitive. It that's ok with him, that's fine, but it should be pointed out because it might not be ok with everyone. Not to mention I don't have those mods on my cars, and the cars were PLENTY fast.
I'm a nice guy. I offered Sky (who's name is Vince) a ride so he could see what it was like, and whether or not he will admit it here, he was pretty surprised by what was going on in that car, and also surprised when I answered his question about how fast can a Mustang go by telling him an ESP car will run Super Stock (the class car he was riding in) speeds.
Maybe I'm nuts to think that this sort of information matters. If I am, I apologize. But let's flip this coin over. Sky writes articles for an online magazine. Whiteline is being very aggressive about their stuff, and I'm quite sure there is a connection. I'm not saying he's fibbing or anything, he might well like the stuff fine. But what basis for comparison is there? That's my issue, and while many might not like it, I am free to have that opinion and I can usually back up my opinions of what works and what doesn't pretty well though results.
Two guys can squabble for a year, it's he said/he said. How do you pick a winner? I think that the proof is in pudding, so to speak. Results prove how things work, that's why I choose to compete, at a high level to make myself, and my setups, better. I don't know what other way there is to prove anything, and I'm not ok with empty words which is what the internet is filled with.
That's all. I know it's blunt, and I don't tend to dance around this stuff. I work hard for my money, and I know you guys do too. I have NEVER run a comped part that I was testing and evaluating because I wanted to the parts to stand on their own. I also don't comp. parts to magazines. GM High Tech Performance did a car back in 2007 with my stuff, because the Editor wanted my stuff and he wrote an article about it afterwards with his opinions. He loved it, car went a crapload faster on track and he daily drove it across NYC. But that opinion didn't show because I gave him the parts, because I didn't.