2015 mustang hits the track

lostsoul

2014 vett or 2015 stang..
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Posts
6,963
Reaction score
95
Location
Gay Area
so wheres the wing at? It needs a wing....


$(KGrHqNHJFYFF0+WoN(+BRjor0gEmg~~60_35.JPG
 

shark tales

Wiggle Wiggle Memeber
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Posts
2,196
Reaction score
1
Location
Charlotte, NC
Indeed! I'd say this is in direct retaliation for the Z28. Thanks Chevy! Were finally getting some brakes and tires that are on par with the engine performance of these cars. Along with IRS, this thing is going to be an absolute monster. I'd still like to see more tire, but this could be a staggered setup too. 295 seems a little small to be going on an 11 inch wheel like you were suggesting Gmitch, but its at least a 10 and likely 10.5. Michelin lists the wheel size range for that tire at 10-11.5". Now imagine if this thing had a dry sump 5.2 litre voodoo engine making 550 NA HP with an 8000 rpm redline.

that's Ferrari territory. one can wish
 

Whiskey11

SCCA Autoscrosser #23 STU
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Posts
1,644
Reaction score
2
Indeed! I'd say this is in direct retaliation for the Z28. Thanks Chevy! Were finally getting some brakes and tires that are on par with the engine performance of these cars. Along with IRS, this thing is going to be an absolute monster. I'd still like to see more tire, but this could be a staggered setup too. 295 seems a little small to be going on an 11 inch wheel like you were suggesting Gmitch, but its at least a 10 and likely 10.5. Michelin lists the wheel size range for that tire at 10-11.5". Now imagine if this thing had a dry sump 5.2 litre voodoo engine making 550 NA HP with an 8000 rpm redline.

Tire's section width within 1" of wheel width is the general rule of thumb for anything desiring to have steering responiveness. A 295 is 11.61" and would not be as happy of a tire as it is on an 11 on an 18x10.5 (although this isn't as bad as some I've seen) or an 18x10. All I know is I will laugh if the SVT Mustang has the Corvettes in their sights for performance. That's a good pipe dream right? :p
 

zquez

Death Dealer
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Posts
997
Reaction score
2
Location
the sky
are those 295's on the front? Mother of god!

Its gonna need more than that if it wants to beat the z/28 with 305's on all four corners. The Z/28 put down a 7:37.40 on the Nurburgring on a WET track, which is faster than a Porsche 911 Carrera S or a Lexus LFA.
 

Whiskey11

SCCA Autoscrosser #23 STU
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Posts
1,644
Reaction score
2
Its gonna need more than that if it wants to beat the z/28 with 305's on all four corners. The Z/28 put down a 7:37.40 on the Nurburgring on a WET track, which is faster than a Porsche 911 Carrera S or a Lexus LFA.

And did so shod in R-Comps... the 2013 GT500 did it in 7:39.XX on street tires, down 40mm of tire up front, down 20mm of tire out back on 220 treadwear summer tires and in the damp.
 

zquez

Death Dealer
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Posts
997
Reaction score
2
Location
the sky
And did so shod in R-Comps... the 2013 GT500 did it in 7:39.XX on street tires, down 40mm of tire up front, down 20mm of tire out back on 220 treadwear summer tires and in the damp.

This is true and similarly impressive, but the GT500 also has 162 horsepower on the Z/28, of which there are ample opportunities to exploit on the ring. Now imagine if the GT500 had the same tires and brakes as the camaro what kind of times could be put down. What is amusing to me is that with all the "weight reduction" measures the Z/28 did, its still only 50 lbs. Lighter Than a 2013 GT500.
 

Full_Tilt

forum member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Posts
1,697
Reaction score
1
I really dont care what it looks like, I just want it to be faster.
 

07TGGT

@user
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Posts
9,408
Reaction score
12
Location
Mansfield, TX
Y'all really take Chevy's "Ring Times" to be 100% true... LOL.

Nor was the entire run in wet conditions, near the very end is when it was light drizzling.
 

zquez

Death Dealer
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Posts
997
Reaction score
2
Location
the sky
Y'all really take Chevy's "Ring Times" to be 100% true... LOL.

Nor was the entire run in wet conditions, near the very end is when it was light drizzling.

It didn't start to rain till the end of the hot lap, but the track didn't look like it was completely dry before hand either. Now, the statement made that on a dry track it would've been 6 seconds faster is kind of out there.

 

tjm73

of Omicron Persei 8
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Posts
12,092
Reaction score
1,638
Location
Rush, NY
It didn't start to rain till the end of the hot lap, but the track didn't look like it was completely dry before hand either. Now, the statement made that on a dry track it would've been 6 seconds faster is kind of out there.

kinda like the "we've run simulations" statement?
 

DIB5.0

forum member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
482
Reaction score
0
Out on the town
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    183.5 KB · Views: 109

NUTCASE

forum member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Posts
1,717
Reaction score
15
Its gonna need more than that if it wants to beat the z/28 with 305's on all four corners. The Z/28 put down a 7:37.40 on the Nurburgring on a WET track, which is faster than a Porsche 911 Carrera S or a Lexus LFA.


MOTHER OF GOD!!!


I guess I need to keep up on these things more. I did not know the camaro was toying with porshe, LFA and rolling 305s.
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top