BleedinBlue
forum member
Awesome.
310/320 to the crank is what they are rated at.
Torrie at Unleashed is who I will probably go with, 300hp to the wheels and 400tq is the norm on 93.
I saw in a few places, tuners were typ getting 300 rwhp...and 417 rwtq..with just a 93 tune..and nothing else. Going from oem 320tq at the crank. ( 281 rwtq)... to 417 rwtq is crazy. That's loads of tq for a dd street car. Sorta like a 60's muscle car, lotsa tq, not much hp. No doubt the ecoboost weighs a heck of a lot less than the 5.0 L...which would have several advantages. Better hp to weight ratio, better front to back weight distribution, better handling, etc.
With 417 rwtq, it should pull hard, esp if the car is a bit lighter. I'd be happy with that package.
If these were set up from the factory like my old '13 Focus ST were, then the torque gains are legit. Ford limits the boost in the lower RPMs for some reason. Tunes just reverse that.
Anyway, I like the car. Congrats! I considered a new EB but ended up getting a new '14 GT since the incentives were so crazy good. Regardless, there's a little bit of jealousy in me about your new car.
Looks awesome, man! Is anyone trying to tune the fusion ecoboost like this, or is it possible?
Greg
When u register the car in CA, wouldn't u have to pay sales tax, that's the way its done in most states.
He shouldn't have to, as long as you can prove you paid sales tax when you originally obtained the vehicle. At least that's how it is in VA. If he couldn't prove he paid tax then they would make him. But all he needs to do is bring the bill of sale. Unless CA is fucked up in some way.Greg
When u register the car in CA, wouldn't u have to pay sales tax, that's the way its done in most states.