2015 Stang pics

[S8MS-01904]

It's neat looking, can't wait to see in person.

 

[BEAST]

It's neat looking, can't wait to see in person.

Its a fucking muscle car, neat should never be in the description. That says plenty. Lol

Brought to you by tapatalk; 70k fuck yeah.

 

[Whiskey11]

Its a fucking muscle car, neat should never be in the description. That says plenty. Lol

Brought to you by tapatalk; 70k fuck yeah.

You do realize the Mustang is not, nor has never been, a Muscle Car right?

 

[Full_Tilt]

^This.

If it was a muscle car I would never have bought one.

 

[BEAST]

You do realize the Mustang is not, nor has never been, a Muscle Car right?

Really. I have lived my entire life under that misconception.

Brought to you by tapatalk; 70k fuck yeah.

 

[Herknav]

Really. I have lived my entire life under that misconception.

Brought to you by tapatalk; 70k fuck yeah.

It's a Pony Car, not a Muscle Car.

 

[Full_Tilt]

A modern muscle car would be more like the CTS-V imo

 

[FR500GT]

I live 10 minutes away from Cars and Coffee! The one day I debate going they bring this...

 

[csamsh]

Yeah I would put a torino or something as more of a muscle car from Ford.

 

[Wicked GT]

So the 1968.5 428 CJ or the 69 Mach 1 428CJ were Pony Cars, not Muscle Cars? I could see the argument of the original Mustang being a Pony Car as well as the Low end models each year but not the big motor or high performance models....? I would never have considered either of those two or the 2013 GT500 as a "Pony Car".

It's a Pony Car, not a Muscle Car.

 

[tjm73]

revs sound like shit. Tinney/raspy in a bad way.

 

[05yellowgt]

revs sound like shit. Tinney/raspy in a bad way.

Sounds like an x pipe to me. I approve.

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 4

 

[Franchi]

I wonder how much a base 15 GT will run about... aka how much do I need to save. lol

 

[HEMI LOL]

revs sound like shit. Tinney/raspy in a bad way.

its a pre production car. you never know, it may have a one off set of mufflers on it. or mufflers from a vendor they no longer use.

 

[05redvert]

So the 1968.5 428 CJ or the 69 Mach 1 428CJ were Pony Cars, not Muscle Cars? I could see the argument of the original Mustang being a Pony Car as well as the Low end models each year but not the big motor or high performance models....? I would never have considered either of those two or the 2013 GT500 as a "Pony Car".

a muscle car would be a standard mid sized car that they put a big engine into to make it something new. The mustang was designed to be sporty and smaller than muscle cars, just like the Camaro/firebird and challenger

 

[tjm73]

its a pre production car. you never know, it may have a one off set of mufflers on it. or mufflers from a vendor they no longer use.

Hope so.

 

[Wicked GT]

So what do you consider a "Muscle Car" to be? I was raised on cars of the late 60's and early 70's and consider Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, Charger, RoadRunner, GTO, Olds, etc. to be "Muscle Cars". I know opinions will vary on this subject so just curious.

Definition[edit]

According to Muscle Cars, a book written by Peter Henshaw, a "muscle car" is "exactly what the name implies. It is a product of the American car industry adhering to the hot rodder's philosophy of taking a small car and putting a large-displacement engine in it. The Muscle Car is Charles Atlas kicking sand in the face of the 98 horsepower weakling."[7] Henshaw further asserts that the muscle car was designed for straight-line speed, and did not have the "sophisticated chassis", "engineering integrity", or "lithe appearance" of European high-performance cars.[7]
However, opinions vary as to whether high-performance full-size cars, compacts, and pony cars qualify as muscle cars.[8]

a muscle car would be a standard mid sized car that they put a big engine into to make it something new. The mustang was designed to be sporty and smaller than muscle cars, just like the Camaro/firebird and challenger

 

[Premium08]

So what do you consider a "Muscle Car" to be? I was raised on cars of the late 60's and early 70's and consider Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, Charger, RoadRunner, GTO, Olds, etc. to be "Muscle Cars". I know opinions will vary on this subject so just curious.

Definition[edit]

According to Muscle Cars, a book written by Peter Henshaw, a "muscle car" is "exactly what the name implies. It is a product of the American car industry adhering to the hot rodder's philosophy of taking a small car and putting a large-displacement engine in it. The Muscle Car is Charles Atlas kicking sand in the face of the 98 horsepower weakling."[7] Henshaw further asserts that the muscle car was designed for straight-line speed, and did not have the "sophisticated chassis", "engineering integrity", or "lithe appearance" of European high-performance cars.[7]
However, opinions vary as to whether high-performance full-size cars, compacts, and pony cars qualify as muscle cars.[8]

Im with you, mustang is a muscle car

 

[Makdaddy]

So the 1968.5 428 CJ or the 69 Mach 1 428CJ were Pony Cars, not Muscle Cars? I could see the argument of the original Mustang being a Pony Car as well as the Low end models each year but not the big motor or high performance models....? I would never have considered either of those two or the 2013 GT500 as a "Pony Car".

^^^^ x2

a muscle car would be a standard mid sized car that they put a big engine into to make it something new. The mustang was designed to be sporty and smaller than muscle cars, just like the Camaro/firebird and challenger

Just Wrong

Im with you, mustang is a muscle car

I agree

Muscle cars are a term from my era and my generation
Mustang's do fit the description
Oh and by the way if your car dose not have a V8 or if it has 4 doors

It isnt a fucking Muscle car

 

[FR500GT]

I think a Saleen style center exhaust would look pretty good...

I can't wait to start messing with this car. SO MANY IDEAS!