Um, hello...I'm right hear. I can see you talking about me.LOL
well if the shoe fits
375rwhp with just a CAI!
- Thread starter Grabber07'
- Start date
well if the shoe fits
Well ok, there is no shoe here, but I like it anyway.
Help me out here.... is this another BS story over on corral.... this guy claims 12s on stock tires with a tune and CAI and full weight. Set me straight here.... read the comments and tell me that Im crazy... I dont know of too many running 12s on street tires without quite a few bolt ons...am I wrong here?
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=974576
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=974576
This has been some funny shit! 
Graypny...did you know Santa is stuck in your chimney?? How the hell will he get to my house if hes on your damn roof?
Stock I pulled 13.9's. With a CAI, OTC Tune, and Cat Back muffs I pulled 13.5's.
4.10 R&P, Shorty Headers, URP, Race Fuel, light-loading the car, $2,500 in suspension work all on a kick ass tune before I saw 12's.
Those guys are smoken' crack...
(OK, $2,500 if I paid retail, closer to $1,500, but still)
4.10 R&P, Shorty Headers, URP, Race Fuel, light-loading the car, $2,500 in suspension work all on a kick ass tune before I saw 12's.
Those guys are smoken' crack...
(OK, $2,500 if I paid retail, closer to $1,500, but still)
Last edited:
Dude... I hit a couple of web based 1/4 mile calcs and put some numbers in. My car dyno'd a little over 350 rwhp. The first 3 calcs I hit said max 1/4 et would be 12.833. I pulled 12.844 on a 50* day, power-shifting all the way down the track.
There is no way I spent $4,500 to pick-up close to 100 RWHP and this kid did it with a $260 CAI. No fuckin' way...
There is no way I spent $4,500 to pick-up close to 100 RWHP and this kid did it with a $260 CAI. No fuckin' way...
How about a nitrous hookup with LEDs that sprays and lights up, but isn't hooked up to the engine. It'll be enough to scare someone away, for sure! Or you can just have the blue and red anodized fittings with the hoses, and no N2O bottle!
I knew I wasnt going crazy. I asked for his videos to be posted....but he could be using N20 so I guess we'll never know. I honestly hate Bull shit!!
I took my car to a mustang dyno about 2 hours from where I live... a friend of mine knows the tuner...was my first time there. We dyno'd my car.... showed 325rwhp and 329rwtq..... I was the first one to call BS on my own car... I was expecting somwhere in the 305-310 hp range...I think my second run was higher than that.
My car is a consistant 12.8 car... I have run a 12.79...I know shes got a 12.6 in her with cold weather...but a consistant 12.8 car with the mods in my sig. The HP calculator says I have about 308rwhp give or take. I run 275/45/17 BFG DRs
I took my car to a mustang dyno about 2 hours from where I live... a friend of mine knows the tuner...was my first time there. We dyno'd my car.... showed 325rwhp and 329rwtq..... I was the first one to call BS on my own car... I was expecting somwhere in the 305-310 hp range...I think my second run was higher than that.
My car is a consistant 12.8 car... I have run a 12.79...I know shes got a 12.6 in her with cold weather...but a consistant 12.8 car with the mods in my sig. The HP calculator says I have about 308rwhp give or take. I run 275/45/17 BFG DRs
Last edited:
Shit, we can take a bone stock GT, throw a 180 shot on it and a tune and push 11's. I'd be full of shit if I said "All I did was put a tune on it."
You have good numbers. We are running close to the same hardware and times. Same thing with 2k05gt and a couple other guys out here. Just helps support your conclusion…
Did the guy have a "Mustang" brand dyno? I noticed that the numbers off those inertia dynos are a shade low compared to a Dyno that offers a dynamic load (also called and Eddy Load). I bet if you had it tested on a dynamic load dyno you would see higher numbers…
It was a "mustang" brand dyno.... i found out he adjusted some things to make what he called "dynojet numbers" due to the mustang dyno generally showing about 10% lower numbers as compared to a dynojet.
The thing is that a mustang dyno has variables you can adjust..these variables can swing your HP up or down. Dynojets do produce some good #s but their are no variables to change so they are consistant...well from what I hear
Heres my dynosheet
Stoenr
forum member
375 out the back with a K & N that doesnt require a tune? 
And oooo UGO, never heard of it until today.
Off that topic, but to the last few post.
CAI,Tune,O/R-h, UDP, LCA's,DR's 12.83/107.15 pretty close to you guys. Dynod at 288/304 before O/R-H
I think thats all shes got for now tho. I drove like a madman that run.
And oooo UGO, never heard of it until today.
Off that topic, but to the last few post.
CAI,Tune,O/R-h, UDP, LCA's,DR's 12.83/107.15 pretty close to you guys. Dynod at 288/304 before O/R-H
I think thats all shes got for now tho. I drove like a madman that run.
I got 25 rwhp on my 05 after I removed the carbon trap that was in the stock air tube! 
Even better, just rip that whole intake tube non-sense right off... Engine still runs without a MAF, put a sock over the TB and you are good to go - old school represent - what's up?...I got 25 rwhp on my 05 after I removed the carbon trap that was in the stock air tube!
:
Stoenr
forum member
Haha
Here's MY dyno sheet!
No idea why I need to post this...
Was this with a CAI, Tune, and the buritto modification?
Similar threads
Support us!
Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!
Click Here For Details
Sponsor Links
