sn95 LeMons - Staggered Tires or Not?

fhlh

Grabber? Don't Know Her!
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Posts
1,717
Reaction score
11
Location
Houston
Coming to the experts on Mustang Chassis... yes, I know it's not an s197, but I'm pretty positive some of you in here have road raced the older chassis...

So we have this 1994 sn95 GT, 5.0, 5 speed. My partner and I are in a pissing match over running a staggeered set of tires or the same size all around (I'm voting for a 275/40/17).. I say we should run the same for a more neutral car, he claims we should run skinnier up front for better turn it... and I quote "is there a smaller size for the front we can run? will help the car turn some."

I asked him how he figured this would help the car turn... he besically asks me how much road racing i've done (only Lemons) and tells me he's right, I'm wrong.... that said I'm of the opinion the car will push, especially coming out of the corners on throttle...

He then he points me to this shit ass wiki and claims it's about unsprung weight?? WTF? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_handling#Tires_and_wheels


Now.. I don't think he is correct about any of this when it comes to the sn97 (or any low powered front engined, rear drive car). To his defense, he is a 911 driver (I high powered, low weight racer. GT2 class I believe) . Completely different car altogether i.e. we all know why they need fat tires out back.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

Sam Strano

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Posts
918
Reaction score
6
I'd run the same, not staggered. Why would you want to put smaller tires on the heavier/harder working end of the car?
 

Sleeper_08

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
627
Reaction score
0
Listen to Sam.

Look at what they run on the real Mustang race cars.

It also allows for tire rotation when you chew up the fronts :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Posts
772
Reaction score
5
Location
Chicago, IL
I would always run same size tires all around.

But as far as the "Real race cars argument", there are plenty running staggered out there and they have their reasons.
 

Germeezy3

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Posts
3,998
Reaction score
26
Porsche's are always staggered which is why he is thinking that way, the Mustang has a front weight bias....it needs as much tire as you can get on the front!
 

Liftedbronco

Shredder
Joined
May 7, 2008
Posts
1,297
Reaction score
4
Location
Harrington Park, NJ
again, same size.
and i have a porsche with a stagger too. and you know what? its all preference, because you just cure the understeer with suspension setups. but the fact is, at the end of the day, the more rubber you have on the road, the more ultimate grip you have to work with.

HOWEVER...yes, narrower front tires will feel better because theyre lighter and have less tendency to wander on uneven pavement. so at the end of the day, ESPECIALLY on the street, its not like one is bad and one is good. chances are unless you are really into this stuff, youd never even feel the difference.

But now that ive doubled back and made it confusing...im wiht everyone else on the fact that the mustang is very heavy...and front heavy too. so you would need more tire up front than say my 944. Again, there are different ways to skin a cat but id look to griggs. Since im sure theyre played out all the scenarios. Are they running a stagger? no. 275's all around. or larger if you can do it.
 

Vapour Trails

The Renaissance Man
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Posts
2,773
Reaction score
41
Location
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Cars that come with staggered tires have their suspension tuning performed with the stagger in mind. I would venture a guess if you reduced the rear tire of a porsche 911 to the size of the front tire, the car would start oversteering. The fat rear tires balance the car out and that is the intention.

Really, your friend doesn't know what he's talking about.

What's the widest tires you guys have crammed up front with stock struts?

Not exactly sure, but I have successfully run 285s in front. I daily drive with 275s all around.
 

Kaldar142

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2008
Posts
2,308
Reaction score
5
Location
Silver Spring, MD
^ Then why are corvettes staggered if they are front engine? (well "technically" mid engine)

My vette is 285 / 335
 

fhlh

Grabber? Don't Know Her!
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Posts
1,717
Reaction score
11
Location
Houston
^ Then why are corvettes staggered if they are front engine? (well "technically" mid engine)

My vette is 285 / 335

much higher Rear@wheel power and better weight distro than a Mustang?
 

ArizonaGT

Road Course Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,248
Reaction score
3
Location
Phoenix, AZ
^ Then why are corvettes staggered if they are front engine? (well "technically" mid engine)

My vette is 285 / 335

Factory "understeer" is safer than oversteer.
That car can probably light the rear tires without even trying.
Your rear-mounted trans helps relieve some of the weight burden off the front end.
 

ArizonaGT

Road Course Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,248
Reaction score
3
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Everyone's solution to handling on this site is "just add more tire" :rofl:

Save for maybe SoundGuyDave and Random Asshole
 

pieperz06

i need to get blown
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Posts
1,645
Reaction score
4
Location
Corpus Christi,TX
Coming to the experts on Mustang Chassis... yes, I know it's not an s197, but I'm pretty positive some of you in here have road raced the older chassis...

So we have this 1994 sn95 GT, 5.0, 5 speed. My partner and I are in a pissing match over running a staggeered set of tires or the same size all around (I'm voting for a 275/40/17).. I say we should run the same for a more neutral car, he claims we should run skinnier up front for better turn it... and I quote "is there a smaller size for the front we can run? will help the car turn some."

I asked him how he figured this would help the car turn... he besically asks me how much road racing i've done (only Lemons) and tells me he's right, I'm wrong.... that said I'm of the opinion the car will push, especially coming out of the corners on throttle...

He then he points me to this shit ass wiki and claims it's about unsprung weight?? WTF? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_handling#Tires_and_wheels


Now.. I don't think he is correct about any of this when it comes to the sn97 (or any low powered front engined, rear drive car). To his defense, he is a 911 driver (I high powered, low weight racer. GT2 class I believe) . Completely different car altogether i.e. we all know why they need fat tires out back.

Thoughts?

i think that if you need another driver you should give me a PM i been wanting to build a lemons car for a long time and im in Houston all the time.
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top