What would the ball park gains in hp/tq and fuel mileage?
I was thinking 13:1.
Thanks.
Since I have access to E-85 where I live, Ohio. I would like to take advantage of it or is there no advantage to running a higher compression ratio then 11:1.
Thanks.
I was a little off on the numbers but here it is
![]()
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
yea @ 15% typical loss its 530RWHP. that's still good considering its only 12:1 and not much of a bump over stock compression. If it was closer to 15:1 it would be around 600RWHP given proper cams/etc.That looks impressive, and it is. But it isn't amazing. A motor on a dyno, with no CAI, no accessories, duno headers and no mufflers. It probably makes 515 at the wheels. With a lot of RPM.