Switched from Poly to Spherical LCAs

2013DIBGT

I Hate Wheelhop
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Posts
333
Reaction score
1
Location
The Ungreat North East
I'm literally a few days away from purchasing new LCA's for my car and have been beating my head against the wall on which way to go in terms of their connection method. The car will be a daily driver but I have heard nothing but bad stories about Poly joints. Especially when it comes to hard launches on sticky rubber. I think the verdict is still out (IMO) on if a Poly/Rod End setup is any better or not.

I am about 75% decided on going full rod end on them just to avoid the headaches and concerns with them shitting the bed on me when getting rowdy with the car. I've heard several folks having only minimal issues with NVH using the Maximum Motorsports Extreme LCA's despite them being rod ends. Is it possible for one brand of Rod end to contribute little NVH while still holding up to high RPM launches on sticky ? If so, which ones would that be? Are the derlin bushings that much softer then a regular Rod end and if its only minimal would someone still have the same problems with hard launches using them verses just going full rod end?

From what I gathered it seems like the key factor with NVH on a full rod end setup lies in what type of bushing is being used on the upper link.
 

Sharad

Site Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Posts
2,403
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Myers, Florida
My daily driver LCAs have poly/poly bushings, and my play car has spherical/spherical bushings.

Our (UPR) cars are running 9s on full poly suspension and we have one 7 and one 8 second car on sphericals.

From a performance standpoint, we prefer sphericals, but our poly bushings work well.
 

Whiskey11

SCCA Autoscrosser #23 STU
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Posts
1,644
Reaction score
4
My daily driver LCAs have poly/poly bushings, and my play car has spherical/spherical bushings.

Our (UPR) cars are running 9s on full poly suspension and we have one 7 and one 8 second car on sphericals.

From a performance standpoint, we prefer sphericals, but our poly bushings work well.

Shame that most of the cars in this section don't care about straight line performance of a poly/poly setup but need something that can articulate without binding and causing a loss of traction when articulating from bind.
 

sheizasosay

Alive
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Posts
1,024
Reaction score
4
The UCA, IMO, has it hands-down on "impact of NVH" over anything in the whole flippin' car. I'm not saying that the UCA bushing doesn't impact NVH generated by LCA's, but.....I had heim LCA's and stock UCA and that shit was very clunky. Every time your car lurches just a tad forward and then just a tad back (taking off) that little movement gets amplified about 500 times through the heims. If you get heims, you're awareness for lurching and/or bucking will become acutely keen at some point, I assure you.

And yes, there is positively a *massive* difference in quality of heim joints. But, I don't care how good your heims are, they will eventually make noise....unless you don't drive it.
 
Last edited:

2013DIBGT

I Hate Wheelhop
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Posts
333
Reaction score
1
Location
The Ungreat North East
Does anyone have any idea why some folks are placing the Poly joint of the (insert brand here) LCA at the axle side and the Rod End at the Body verses others who do the opposite?

In this link below found on StangTV Kenny Browns LCA has the Poly joint on the Axle side. Is one way better then the other or maybe a better way to ask would be is one way wrong?

PIC from StangTV Kenny Brown AGS4 setup:
http://cdn.speednik.com/files/2013/07/MG2_7415.jpg
 

Sharad

Site Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Posts
2,403
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Myers, Florida
Shame that most of the cars in this section don't care about straight line performance of a poly/poly setup but need something that can articulate without binding and causing a loss of traction when articulating from bind.

Good point. I should not have emphasized the ETs. The reason why I mentioned it is because I believe someone mentioned poly bushings not holding up under the load. What I meant to imply was that not all poly bushings are equal and ours handle some pretty severe shock. But you're right. ETs are irrelevant here.
 

908ssp

Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2010
Posts
1,123
Reaction score
0
Location
Michigan
Does anyone have any idea why some folks are placing the Poly joint of the (insert brand here) LCA at the axle side and the Rod End at the Body verses others who do the opposite?

In this link below found on StangTV Kenny Browns LCA has the Poly joint on the Axle side. Is one way better then the other or maybe a better way to ask would be is one way wrong?

PIC from StangTV Kenny Brown AGS4 setup:
http://cdn.speednik.com/files/2013/07/MG2_7415.jpg

If the ball bushing itself is making the noise from being worn and it is on the body end you will hear it. If the urethane end is at the body it will dampen and muffle some of the noise from the worn ball bushing.
 

19COBRA93

Ford Racing
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Posts
7,577
Reaction score
22
Location
Clinton, Ut
I knew my rod end joints were somewhat noisy, but I didn't realize the extent of it until I swapped them out for polys. It's a significant difference.

Right now I run around on the polys for daily use, and when I hit up the track, I swap on my rod ended arms. They take about 15 mins to swap out, so it's really not a big deal.
 

BMR Tech

Traction Vendor
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Posts
4,863
Reaction score
13
Location
Tampa, FL
I'm literally a few days away from purchasing new LCA's for my car and have been beating my head against the wall on which way to go in terms of their connection method. The car will be a daily driver but I have heard nothing but bad stories about Poly joints. Especially when it comes to hard launches on sticky rubber. I think the verdict is still out (IMO) on if a Poly/Rod End setup is any better or not.

I am about 75% decided on going full rod end on them just to avoid the headaches and concerns with them shitting the bed on me when getting rowdy with the car. I've heard several folks having only minimal issues with NVH using the Maximum Motorsports Extreme LCA's despite them being rod ends. Is it possible for one brand of Rod end to contribute little NVH while still holding up to high RPM launches on sticky ? If so, which ones would that be? Are the derlin bushings that much softer then a regular Rod end and if its only minimal would someone still have the same problems with hard launches using them verses just going full rod end?

From what I gathered it seems like the key factor with NVH on a full rod end setup lies in what type of bushing is being used on the upper link.

If your car is a daily driver, I highly recommend using a Poly/Rod-end similar to our TCA021:

TCA021_large.jpg

If you are not wanting the adjustment in that style, we make a true spherical bearing style, with a Poly on one end as well. this FK Spherical Bearing on the Axle side, is a very nice piece...and features a Static Load Rating of over 50,000lbs....about double the rating of your average "Rod-End" on most companies LCA.
TCA022_large.jpg

The UCA, IMO, has it hands-down on "impact of NVH" over anything in the whole flippin' car. I'm not saying that the UCA bushing doesn't impact NVH generated by LCA's, but.....I had heim LCA's and stock UCA and that shit was very clunky. Every time your car lurches just a tad forward and then just a tad back (taking off) that little movement gets amplified about 500 times through the heims. If you get heims, you're awareness for lurching and/or bucking will become acutely keen at some point, I assure you.

And yes, there is positively a *massive* difference in quality of heim joints. But, I don't care how good your heims are, they will eventually make noise....unless you don't drive it.

I agree with this, very much so.

OP, as Sheiza has stated....there is definitely a difference in quality of Rod-Ends and Spherical Bearings. I also agree with him, over time....they will all gain some slop and make noise....it is just a matter of "when". For this reason, we offer a very good, but economical Rod-End on most of our components that are adjustable w/ Rod-Ends. The replacement pieces on our parts are in the $25 range, per end.

Does anyone have any idea why some folks are placing the Poly joint of the (insert brand here) LCA at the axle side and the Rod End at the Body verses others who do the opposite?

In this link below found on StangTV Kenny Browns LCA has the Poly joint on the Axle side. Is one way better then the other or maybe a better way to ask would be is one way wrong?

PIC from StangTV Kenny Brown AGS4 setup:
http://cdn.speednik.com/files/2013/07/MG2_7415.jpg

908ssp answers the primary reason below. We have done rigurous testing, and we ALWAYS use a Poly on the chassis side. We have also been involved in 3rd party testing with a company that goes above and beyond, from an engineering and testing standpoint....with very high-end equipment, and their results matched our "cheap way" of testing.

If the ball bushing itself is making the noise from being worn and it is on the body end you will hear it. If the urethane end is at the body it will dampen and muffle some of the noise from the worn ball bushing.

Correct. The ball, in just about every bearing design available, will, at some time develop more slop than when it is new. This creates an increase in NVH.

I knew my rod end joints were somewhat noisy, but I didn't realize the extent of it until I swapped them out for polys. It's a significant difference.

Right now I run around on the polys for daily use, and when I hit up the track, I swap on my rod ended arms. They take about 15 mins to swap out, so it's really not a big deal.

I have many customers who do exactly this. After a few swaps, you can exchange LCA on these cars in a matter of minutes.
 

chaoscentral

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Posts
160
Reaction score
1
Location
Danvers, MA
A little bit of background and my current setup:

I've been running the below setup for a while now, and it's worked very well except for one issue. I could not get the rear end to behave properly when under lateral loads (hard cornering).


TRUNCATED...

Bottom line - if you plan on pushing the car hard through corners and dont mind a bit more NVH and having to occasionally lubricate the rod ends, definitely choose them over all poly bushings. Here are links to the exact arms I'm running now if anyone is interested.

UCA/Mount
http://www.uprproducts.com/mustang-...ouble-adjustable-upper-3rd-link-mount-11.html

LCAs
http://www.uprproducts.com/mustang-chrome-moly-double-adjustable-lower-control-arms-street-05.html

Can I just say I love you in the most platonic way ever? I installed some LCAs I bought over a year ago, and I greased up the poly side but had no idea what to do with the spherical side, and this pretty much cured all the squeaks creaks and groans I had coming from the rear. They are a little bit there still but atleast 10 times quieter. So my car doesn't sound like a jalopy when I pull out of the driveway anymore!
 

Napoleon85

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Posts
719
Reaction score
0
Location
Centerville, OH
Can I just say I love you in the most platonic way ever? I installed some LCAs I bought over a year ago, and I greased up the poly side but had no idea what to do with the spherical side, and this pretty much cured all the squeaks creaks and groans I had coming from the rear. They are a little bit there still but atleast 10 times quieter. So my car doesn't sound like a jalopy when I pull out of the driveway anymore!

LOL ... thanks, I think. As said above, it will need lubricated from time to time (interval will depend on mileage), but I don't feel it's that big of a deal to keep it somewhat quiet.
 

Diabolical!

Zapp Rowsdower
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Posts
364
Reaction score
0
I've got rod ends on both ends of the LCAs and both ends of the UCA (spherical bushing above the pumpkin with a rod end LCA). Everything is UPR. It's straight up noisy, but I love it. After I finish putting the UPR K-member in, I expect even more NVH. I consider that NVH a badge of honor as long as I keep dropping time at the track. (I know I'm in the wrong section for drag racers, but I had to throw in my 2 cents about how I feel about the NVH.)
 

Sharad

Site Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Posts
2,403
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Myers, Florida
I've got rod ends on both ends of the LCAs and both ends of the UCA (spherical bushing above the pumpkin with a rod end LCA). Everything is UPR. It's straight up noisy, but I love it. After I finish putting the UPR K-member in, I expect even more NVH. I consider that NVH a badge of honor as long as I keep dropping time at the track. (I know I'm in the wrong section for drag racers, but I had to throw in my 2 cents about how I feel about the NVH.)

It's all good about throwing in your 2 cents in the corner carver forum.

Napoleon actually uses this car for cornering AND drag. He has a nice set of drag radials for it... That's one of the reasons why I slipped up and mentioned drag earlier. I know how he uses the car.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top