Bizzyb0nes
Member
for me it is because i can not own a vette because of insurance costs.
but a modified mustang is the best thing i can get till im 25+
Its cheaper to insurance a c6 then an s197 for me..about $20 a month
for me it is because i can not own a vette because of insurance costs.
but a modified mustang is the best thing i can get till im 25+
Its cheaper to insurance a c6 then an s197 for me..about $20 a month
. The only downside with the 'vette is cost of ownership (parts) and practicality.
Floaty is a damping issue. I'm sorry, I don't recall what shocks. D-specs? How about the settings? How about the spring rates?
second issue is... the steering feels really light, when i take a turn in the vette, the steering is very firm. The stangs steering feels just... light, almost like no resistance lol
mine is over 1k a year and with a vette it would go up significantly
This live axle discussion has been beaten to death. The Griggs setup changes the geometry of the chassis and feels totally different. The torque arm eliminates the "snap". The SLA front end maintains the geometry more accurately during suspension travel. The car feels light. In the hands of a capable driver it will run with anything remotely comparable in power/weight ratio.
The track should be the ultimate proving ground, not talking points. Just like some people criticize the LS7 for being a low tech pushrod engine. When you line up next to a 12 cylinder, 72 valve, 48,000 moving parts Ferrari and smoke his butt no one's going to car about the pushrods.

Ground control coilovers, AKA Konis w/ eibach springs. Not sure of the EXACT rates but they are pretty damn stiff, they advertise them as the "track/school" kit.
Might try coming up 1/2" or so. How are your A-arms's, LCA's? Level with the ground? High at the ball joint? FWIW, I'm running roughly in the middle of the adjustment range; you could be hitting the bump stops if you're all the way at the bottom. My A-arms are about level and with relocation brackets I've got roughly 2.5 degrees downward angle on the LCA's.its pretty bumpy, its not THAT low but probably lower than it should be for optimum handling. Its actually lowered down all the way on the ground control kit, which is a tad bit lower than the Pro-kit (if i had to guess i'd say lowered overall 1.7 to 1.8).
You could always try the FR500C rack, but unless you know a guy, that'll set you back over $1000. Not a whole lot you can do there, we just have over-boosted PS systems. Or if you're feeling really adventurous you could be the first to retrofit EPAS and try playing with the computer module calibrations..second issue is... the steering feels really light, when i take a turn in the vette, the steering is very firm. The stangs steering feels just... light, almost like no resistance lol
You could always try the FR500C rack, but unless you know a guy, that'll set you back over $1000. Not a whole lot you can do there, we just have over-boosted PS systems. Or if you're feeling really adventurous you could be the first to retrofit EPAS and try playing with the computer module calibrations..![]()
what about the griggs steering rack it says it is 15-1 ratio im not sure what it is stock but there race rack may do some thing
I have no experience with it or the FR500C rack, I was merely pointing out that it's out there. Now that I think about it the C's use a different tie rod end, maybe the difference is in the tie rod and/or inner joint. I'd do some more homework before investing in that unit..
To add some tech..stock/FR500C racks are 15.7:1.
The FR500C rack is $1500, btw...
Quick ratio, 15.6:1, steering rack for road racing. Refined high speed feedback. Service replacement steering rack for the Mustang FR500C race car. Fits 2005-08 Mustang GT and 2007-08 Shelby GT500.