Aug 4, 2009 #1 S SVTsupremecy Member Joined Oct 12, 2007 Posts 146 Reaction score 0 http://www.svtperformance.com/forum.../624331-2009-srt-8-challenger-vs-2007-gt.html Last edited: Aug 4, 2009
Aug 4, 2009 #2 C civicex2g Here Joined Aug 4, 2009 Posts 4 Reaction score 0 Location Miami, Fl very nice!
Aug 4, 2009 #3 S swat 79 Senior Member Joined Feb 16, 2009 Posts 1,541 Reaction score 0 Location MD Wow, nice runs. I didn't know a slightly modded mustang gt could take an srt-8 chally, let alone with an intake.
Wow, nice runs. I didn't know a slightly modded mustang gt could take an srt-8 chally, let alone with an intake.
Aug 4, 2009 #4 jjay760 Senior Member Joined Apr 28, 2009 Posts 1,391 Reaction score 1 Location N San Diego congrats man! 1 more for ford
Aug 5, 2009 #5 Error404 photographer Joined May 8, 2007 Posts 622 Reaction score 3 Location Culver City, CA swat 79 said: Wow, nice runs. I didn't know a slightly modded mustang gt could take an srt-8 chally, let alone with an intake. Click to expand... they weight a good bit more than the s197's, even though we are already kinda heavy lol Last edited: Aug 5, 2009
swat 79 said: Wow, nice runs. I didn't know a slightly modded mustang gt could take an srt-8 chally, let alone with an intake. Click to expand... they weight a good bit more than the s197's, even though we are already kinda heavy lol
Aug 5, 2009 #6 S swat 79 Senior Member Joined Feb 16, 2009 Posts 1,541 Reaction score 0 Location MD True, but the weight would only really matter from a dig correct? from a roll they already have the mass moving.
True, but the weight would only really matter from a dig correct? from a roll they already have the mass moving.
