Scott - I would question ANY comparison where the tunes were dynoed after multiple pulls were done. I don't care who's tunes were being done.
that pretty much hits the nail on the head.
Also if cool down was really an issue why were the bama tunes increasing in HP each pull.
If the situation was reversed and I did Bama last with less HP no one would question that..
I wasnt referring to you or Seer Dave, but there are several others Im referring to. and I fully agree with you
I've found this to be true. These engines like heat, specifically higher ECTs. Everytime I've had mine on the rollers with the same tune I've progressively made higher numbers. Could be a fluid viscosity issue or a tame ECT vs spark table, I don't know.that pretty much hits the nail on the head.
Also if cool down was really an issue why were the bama tunes increasing in HP each pull.
I believe he did Pull, tune, pull, tune, pull, pull, Lund tune, pull.
It was the tune he sent me. He didnt want to work with me so I went back to Bama. I still have his tune. Ill probably use it at the beach or something for the Cam'd effect.
Ok. Thats fair and I understand. So lets compare the email Lund tune to the Email Bama tune before he made corrections....Yup still roughly 20hp difference.
If I have time before April 28th (Dyno day at my Buddys shop) Ill do some logs for Lund and have him correct the tune and then compare them.
the 5.0 likes to run rich. Makes more power. That's due partly to the high compression.lund is just very haed to get a hold of! I have sent him nemerous datalogs to make revisions if he saw the need to and i never heared anything back from him. He did in one email before the datalogs were sent saying there is no need for any changes my tune is safe. I than asked what about futre mods like boss mani, longtubes etc, and he said my tunes are set up for that.. I mean ok maybe but I am under the impression that every car is different and some things may need to be changed? but guess not. I mean it runs good, but I think some things as far as running super rich could be fixed!
Ok. Thats fair and I understand. So lets compare the email Lund tune to the Email Bama tune before he made corrections....Yup still roughly 20hp difference.
If I have time before April 28th (Dyno day at my Buddys shop) Ill do some logs for Lund and have him correct the tune and then compare them.
Shit on the rollers, how about the ass dyno. does anybody notice a difference in the tunes in question on the street or strip ?