Pretty much it my man.....So are we waiting on anything else from ford or is it basically a "lets wait until blown motors start coming in until we look further into it" situation?
So are we waiting on anything else from ford or is it basically a "lets wait until blown motors start coming in until we look further into it" situation?
negative, it collapses in when under throttle and then returns to normal after it returns to vaccum...movement occurs on mine when I hit the throttle and then goes away when I release it.....

It sounds like many peoples are flexing more then 1mm.
The 1mm was at the injector boss which is the base of the injector. The base of the injector is technically the "pivot" point. There will be more than 1mm of movement at the fuel rail because that's where the movement is the greatest because the most movement comes from the side of the manifold where the fuel rail attaches.
And once again, I want to emphasize to everyone... Not a single failure or problem has come from all this.
And once again, I want to emphasize to everyone... Not a single failure or problem has come from all this.
so your saying even that amount on that video is ok? I need something to base off of when I get mine installed.. I will be cramming 15lbs in it..
No one F'd up. It's been said numerous times that the movement is "normal".can't we all just agree that either frpp f'ed up on a few or f'ed up on the overall design of the manifold.
Not the same, but nice try. Your little comparo may work if no one had ever been stung by hornets while throwing rocks at their nest. The fact is, you throw rocks at a Hornets nest, you're very likely to get stung because history shows it's happened before.Yet.
I like throwing rocks at the hornets nest across the street. I haven't been stung yet so it must be safe.![]()
I too will be cramming about 14lbs in it as well, and I'm not a bit worried about it. It'll be going on my brand new 302 stroker, so if there was a true concern, I wouldn't risk it.
No one F'd up. It's been said numerous times that the movement is "normal".
No one F'd up. It's been said numerous times that the movement is "normal".
Not the same, but nice try. Your little comparo may work if no one had ever been stung by hornets while throwing rocks at their nest. The fact is, you throw rocks at a Hornets nest, you're very likely to get stung because history shows it's happened before.
It's more like saying... "You better not pet that kitten, it has sharp teeth and will bite your finger off!" When in fact, just because a kitten may show aggression and does have sharp teeth, it isn't going to bite your finger off. You just need to look past the aggression and sharp teeth and realize that it's just a kitten.
But we're not comparing an intake manifold that's been in consumer hands for an extended period of time.
So you don't think someone learned their lesson the first time they threw rocks at a hornets nest? Obviously, not everyone who has done it knew the consequence. Just as now, we don't know if failures will result from the constant flexing of the intake.
Here's an excerpt from the current MM&FF issue titled Hustle and Flow.
"A common misconception with composite intakes is the ability to stand up to boost. According to Kershaw, Ford Racing tested theThree-Valve intake to 2.5 bar pressure or roughly 35psi, and after some ballooning in the early development phases, the intake manifold has specific reinforced areas, which allow for extremely high boost levels."
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't feel comfortable cramming 35psi in that thing seeing what I've seen so far.
And I have no idea where you were going with your kitten analogy.![]()
Not for nothing but has anyone done the same revving on a stock intake to see if there was any movement. I have had my car for four years now and never once stood outside revving the engine to see if anything moved. If it wasn't for the video I probably wouldn't have done it now. From what I am understanding from the frpp write up I think this movement works as a safety mechanism, kind of like the pop off valve on a pressure cooker. The lid will deform under cooking pressure but the valve blows off if pressures get too high so the pot doesn't explode. Seems the deformation is to let an overpressured intake to release at the gasket like the pop off valve instead of blowing up.
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't feel comfortable cramming 35psi in that thing seeing what I've seen so far.
And I have no idea where you were going with your kitten analogy.![]()