I never saw the link but I assume you found this:
http://www.nasaproracing.com/rules/time_trial_classification.pdf
And the base classing was supposed be TTD** (which means TTD +14 base penalty points), according to
this (see page 19-20) in the 2014 rules.
And your buddy's 2000 GT would be TTE**. But I take if from your posts that you got a dyno-reclass granted and now it goes to straight TTD? No more 14 point penalty? Looks like with a 130 pound addition of weight to the previous class minimum. If so, congrats on the free points!
Make sure to account for anything you have changed
or that came as optional from the factory that doesn't match up exactly with the "base 2005 GT" as Greg has classed it for TTD. On my 2011 GT when I ran it in TTB I had to take 4 points for "non-stock aero" because I didn't have the one GT wing that came in the default Mustang GT package. My spoiler delete was the same points as the giant wing we now run in TT3!
Yes, it was a factory option to delete the spoiler, but they don't class the options, they class the base GT package. Just be mindful to count all of your points.
I'm amazed that the 2005-06 V8 GTs started off in TTD (or TTD**), as the 2007-2009 is TTC but -100 pounds and the 2010 GT is TTC +100 pounds. And then the 2011-14 GT is in TTB! Confusing...
------
When making TT upgrades
based on points it is hard to beat the basics, which are what others here have suggested:
- Springs (obviously coilover spring rates, on one of the below shocks)
- Shocks (MCS TT1 or TT2 or AST 4150)
- Tire Compound
We've seen that it is more worthwhile to use your points on a Hoosier A6 compound than added tire width - to an extent. We've seen a rash of TTB drivers in our region move from a 275 R6 to a 246 A6, and go significantly faster... Of course with 3580 pounds minimum weight it is going to be hard to get a 245mm A6 to last a full weekend. It might be prudent to spend some points on +20mm, at the very least, if not +30mm to a 275mm tire.
If you go to a 245 A6 just be extremely cautions of tire temps and degredation. You might make a full weekend if you only take one hot lap per session, and only run in the earlier/cooler sessions. The Hoosier A6 is fast but its kind of a pain in the ass to race on. Just be prepared for a lot of this...
We typically run at least 2 different sets of tires in a NASA TT weekend. I'll start out with the Saturday TT practice session on Saturday on a set of scrubs from the previous race, just to get a good spot on grid. Usually take 3-4 laps, to get a feel for the track - assuming I know this track layout well. If we come on Friday for a test-n-tune to a new track or to test a new set-up we might bring a third set of sacrificial tires - sometimes an R6 set.
Then for the first timed session on Saturday we switch to a
brand new sticker set of A6s to lay down one lap, which is usually my best time of the day. Then, if we want to take more laps (or let my wife drive on our team entry) we switch
back to the used scrubs for later sessions that day - that are always slower, due to climbing ambient/track temps. Then back to the sticker set for Sunday's first session, then normally we pack it up and wait/watch (or my wife goes out on what's left of "new" these tires). I'll only go back out if there is somebody close.
When you play the Hoosier A6 game get ready for stacks and stacks of used scrub tires and large tire bills
Again - I'm not encouraging people to run a Hoosier A6. It is a ludicrous waste of money, so
unless you are rich -or-
winning a set every NASA weekend (takes 5 cars in class to win 2 tires per day for 1st), think twice about the A6 option. An R6, or Kumho V710, or BFG R-1 are all
much longer wearing tires and each one is about a second two or so slower, and you can run more than 1-2 laps without huge lap time penalties. The Maxxis is another option with an attractive tire contingency, but it is slower. One of my main TT3 competitors was on the new Maxxis tire at our last NASA event and was fully 6 seconds back, whereas when he's on new A6s he is usually more like 1-2 seconds back. So...
And edit to add, I have contacted AST and Vorshlag to continue offering their double digressive shocks. I can't imagine a better track/street compromise.
We're working with the new AST distributor to get our dealership reestablished. They don't foresee any stock until July 2014, at the soonest. One thing to note: AST prices went up significantly in this re-org and the 4150 is going to cost the same as the MCS TT1, about $2650.
For the maximum performance in TT with the least number of points, the MCS
TT2 (internal double adjustable - no remotes) is the hot set-up. We are selling a ton of these to NASA TT racers in lettered classes. Both the
TT1 and
TT2 have a thicker wall strut housings than the comparable AST model, and could be stronger in the long run. But any of these will work very well, and the AST 4150 has a slightly more digressive rebound curve, and might ride a tick better on the street. The mythical "4250" AST internal double doesn't exist and likely never will, so if you want the doubles you are limited to MCS - among these two monotube adjustable brands.
Good luck, and we're working on your AST 4150 order.
