Plans for Rear seat delete

Tre06GTP1SC

South Texas Death Ride
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Posts
2,770
Reaction score
53
Location
El Paso, Tx
Not my intention to start an intake argument. After seeing the rear seat delete kit I got, my advice to the OP is to delete the rear seat delete kit.
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
206
Location
Virginia Beach
And let me guess, put that POS FRRP plastic crap on there? No thanks. Im more than happy with the way the C and L out performs the FRRP.

Nope not even, you would be better with the stock one than the c&l lol, the small perormance gain is being canceled out by the weight you put on.
That all you got?

I'll keep the 20 lbs and the ability to blow your doors off at any time. :evil:

I think you would need to put the twins back on first there SD. lol
And something tells me your driving skills would give you that ability not your sponsored manifold. :)

My FRPP performs just fine and saved me $200

And 20lbs! lol

30rwhp from 3800rpm up at 12 psi and no added weight works just fine for me too. Even with the black lung lol
 
Last edited:

CMK720

Senior Member
Joined
May 3, 2010
Posts
864
Reaction score
0
Location
SoFla
Not to be a dick but wtf are you guys stupid. Just go to Home Depot buy some supplies and make one for $20...
 

GrnBullitt08

Dale Jr
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Posts
15,081
Reaction score
199
Location
Northwest Indiana
Say "when".

Not my intention to start an intake argument. After seeing the rear seat delete kit I got, my advice to the OP is to delete the rear seat delete kit.

No reason to start an arguement. Im just saying the POS FRPP manifold is holding up just fine so far and is performing well for what I'm doing with it. It varies on application. I'm sure the C&L is much better design for your power levels.

As far as the rear seat delete goes. Either design it yourself or don't delete it. Not worth wasting money on for the minimal weight savings
 

GrnBullitt08

Dale Jr
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Posts
15,081
Reaction score
199
Location
Northwest Indiana
Nope not even, you would be better with the stock one than the c&l lol, the small perormance gain is being canceled out by the weight you put on.
That all you got?



I think you would need to put the twins back on first there SD. lol
And something tells me your driving skills would give you that ability not your sponsored manifold. :)



And 20lbs! lol

30rwhp from 3800rpm up at 12 psi and no added weight works just fine for me too. Even with the black lung lol

Yeah it seems to be hold fine to your 600rwhp :beerchug2:
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
206
Location
Virginia Beach
Not to be a dick but wtf are you guys stupid. Just go to Home Depot buy some supplies and make one for $20...

Wtf are you doing, redneck engineering? Or you could leave the perfectly fine, light, oem seats that will always look a thousand times better for $0...
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
206
Location
Virginia Beach
My advice, take 10 seconds to pop the back seat bottom out and weigh it. You probably have more weight in change in the cupholders. The back part is just as light.

Its foam, some plastic and upholstery...

And dont forget wether you buy one or build one you are putting weight right back in and making it look like ass.
 

HOLYWD

S197 Junkie
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Posts
15,716
Reaction score
192
You forget


It's also a ride moocher delete as well ;)
 

Tre06GTP1SC

South Texas Death Ride
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Posts
2,770
Reaction score
53
Location
El Paso, Tx
No reason to start an arguement. Im just saying the POS FRPP manifold is holding up just fine so far and is performing well for what I'm doing with it. It varies on application. I'm sure the C&L is much better design for your power levels.

As far as the rear seat delete goes. Either design it yourself or don't delete it. Not worth wasting money on for the minimal weight savings

Agreed on both accounts

Yeah it seems to be hold fine to your 600rwhp :beerchug2:

As the C and L is holding up just fine with 600rwhp here:beerchug2:

Wtf are you doing, redneck engineering? Or you could leave the perfectly fine, light, oem seats that will always look a thousand times better for $0...

No arguments there. Lesson learned on my part. Lucky for me Jarrod and LRS takes returns.
 

CMK720

Senior Member
Joined
May 3, 2010
Posts
864
Reaction score
0
Location
SoFla
Wtf are you doing, redneck engineering? Or you could leave the perfectly fine, light, oem seats that will always look a thousand times better for $0...


No, I meant for the people that want to do that rear seat delete. The rear seats are foam, so there is really no point.
 

GrnBullitt08

Dale Jr
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Posts
15,081
Reaction score
199
Location
Northwest Indiana
My advice, take 10 seconds to pop the back seat bottom out and weigh it. You probably have more weight in change in the cupholders. The back part is just as light.

Its foam, some plastic and upholstery...

And dont forget wether you buy one or build one you are putting weight right back in and making it look like ass.

That's right the new Billet Turbo. Can't wait to see how it performs.

Agreed on both accounts



As the C and L is holding up just fine with 600rwhp here:beerchug2:



No arguments there. Lesson learned on my part. Lucky for me Jarrod and LRS takes returns.

I agree with you on the C L as well. They make a great product.
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top