stang tv procharger...

[zxmarekxz]

sorry if old new...

520whp, but they didnt mention how much boost

http://www.stangtv.com/news/new-products/video-prochargers-2011-mustang-gt-blower-on-the-dyno/

 

[GrnBullitt08]

Thats the first time I've seen it.

 

[Hufen]

same here, first time. Watching now~

 

[zxmarekxz]

http://www.procharger.com/2011_mustang.shtml

ProCharger Boost and Power
• Boost: 7 psi
• RWHP: 510+
• Bolt on 165+ hp
• 91 octane fuel required


from their site

 

[GrnBullitt08]

http://www.procharger.com/2011_mustang.shtml

ProCharger Boost and Power
• Boost: 7 psi
• RWHP: 510+
• Bolt on 165+ hp
• 91 octane fuel required


from their site

hmmm....not too shabby.

 

[Hufen]

So in the video they claim 520.8RWHP on a mustang dyno @ 7 psi through an EDIT: MANUAL ALSO.. thats pretty impressive imo.

They do the same test with another manual and put down 527.

tlr: ^^^ for people that dont want to watch the video

EDIT: BOTH CARS ARE MANUALS

 

[zxmarekxz]

So in the video they claim 520.8RWHP on a mustang dyno @ 7 psi.. thats pretty impressive imo.

oo, mustang, I missed that part. impressive indeed

 

[Boorail85]

So in the video they claim 520.8RWHP on a mustang dyno @ 7 psi through an auto.. thats pretty impressive imo.

They do the same test with a manual and put down 527.

tlr: ^^^ for people that dont want to watch the video

the manual only did 7rwhp more than the auto?

 

[zxmarekxz]

might just be me, but efficient trannys usually arent as tough. Im guessing less metal = weaker. just something I noticed, I may be way off..

 

[kyoshosp2]

Vid don't play for me .. Hmm

 

[05yellowgt]

So in the video they claim 520.8RWHP on a mustang dyno @ 7 psi through an auto.. thats pretty impressive imo.

They do the same test with a manual and put down 527.

tlr: ^^^ for people that dont want to watch the video

The video I just watched from this link showed a GT C/S and a regular GT both 6 speed Manuals. The C/S did 520 and the GT did 527.

 

[JJ@WMS]

I see 473/382 before the weather correction factor.

JJ

 

[jdebs]

kind of a stupid question. but what is the difference between a mustang dyno and a regular dyno?

 

[05yellowgt]

kind of a stupid question. but what is the difference between a mustang dyno and a regular dyno?

Different brand of dyno. All Mustang Dyno's are eddy current dyno's. They use a load cell to generate resistance against the rollers that the car is trying to accelerate. The amount of load generated is calculated by the dyno computer based on the dyno operators input of vehicle weight and frontal area. The Dyno computer takes those numbers and then estimates the load that the load cell will generate to try and approximate the load that the car would see on the street and the same speed, taking into account wind resistance and the mass of the vehicle.

All dynojets are inertia dyno's. They have a very heavy roller drum and based their power calculations on the rate that the car is able to accelerate the drum. DynoJets have the option for an eddy current load cell that can be added to give them the ability to add additional load on top of the load of trying to accelerate the drum.

Hope this helps.

 

[jdebs]

helps a lot. thanks!

 

[Twinscrewgt]

the manual only did 7rwhp more than the auto?

the auto would be in 4th (numbers will be inflated) vs the manual dynoing in a true 1:1 gear

 

[Flipflopp]

Nice numbers for that kit. I just dont like the location of the air inlet pipe. I know its intercooled but that thing is going to be breathing in some serious heat.

 

[05yellowgt]

Again guys, BOTH cars in that video were MANUALS!

 

[Hufen]

yes guys i was mistaken, not sure why i thought the first was an auto!

 

[05yellowgt]

yes guys i was mistaken, not sure why i thought the first was an auto!

No worries, just trying to make sure people don't continue to be confused. I actually had to go back and watch the video again to make sure I hadn't gotten it wrong!