HEY! What's going on here??
My car likes 6800 across the board, rev limiter is at 7200
What rpm does your power peak at?
HEY! What's going on here??
My car likes 6800 across the board, rev limiter is at 7200
Yup I made it
Well we scatter out convo's on ideas and plans all over the place. So tech can be in here, shooting the shit, and Idea's are always welcome.
so Ive been thinking of getting my ring gear lightened
Just because. All Motor Crew #'s pm me if wanted.
thank the SC Chat boys for the Idea, couldn't let em have all the fun round here.
Stock rod weight - 615 grams
Manly H- beam rod weight 598 Grams
Stock rod weight - 615 grams
Manly H- beam rod weight 598 Grams
Wow....looking at rod weight.....its getting extreme....but noted. I plan on building a 10:1 or 11:1 N/A combo for mine next year..
I have already converted, no need for cookies. I installed my 4.56s last week.
And yes Matt I think you are the highest. Mine is set @ 6800.
HEY! What's going on here??
My car likes 6800 across the board, rev limiter is at 7200, if the track will take it I'll launch off the limiter..
Yeeeeee Boi
Welcome into the best thread yet to come of all of our misc threads
Go 11:1 to even bother with 10:1 lol
To be honest... im looking into build this 4.6 bottom end this winter. I should have some specs shortly.
Until I can afford to do the 5.0 swap the way I want -_-
Im going to keep it under 289 cubic inch to fit nmra pure street or nmca mean street rules. I have to price the cost of a few differn't types of race fuel monday...
Which is a popular belief held among people who have no fuckin' idea what they're talking about. Cylinder head porting, when done correctly, does not lose low speed velocity through the intake tract nor does it cause a loss of low end torque/horsepower.its my understanding that porting has a negative effect on low end...one tends to lose velocity, therefore low end torque...
Modmax I beams = 580 grams. There are lighter rods out there if you've got the cash and the time.Stock rod weight - 615 grams
Manly H- beam rod weight 598 Grams
Actually....that math doesn't apply in this instance. Lighter rods/pistons/crank assembly allow the engine to accelerate quicker through the rpm range. The quicker the engine accelerates...the quicker the car accelerates. Simple. Same thing applies to cylinder head components. You can actually go beyond just lightweight components. There are coatings and surface finishing that help the components rpm quicker and shed oil so there is less windage and oil drag. You guys can talk bigger cams, more gear, higher shift points, etc, etc......truly, seriously powerful N/A engines are an art form and border on a black art.I know i'm not the first one to notice, but when you are weighing rods, you may have a weight OCD thing going on ahahahaahaaha
0.00024 milligrams = 0.0012 in the 1/4!!!!
Which is a popular belief held among people who have no fuckin' idea what they're talking about. Cylinder head porting, when done correctly, does not lose low speed velocity through the intake tract nor does it cause a loss of low end torque/horsepower.
Modmax I beams = 580 grams. There are lighter rods out there if you've got the cash and the time.
Actually....that math doesn't apply in this instance. Lighter rods/pistons/crank assembly allow the engine to accelerate quicker through the rpm range. The quicker the engine accelerates...the quicker the car accelerates. Simple. Same thing applies to cylinder head components. You can actually go beyond just lightweight components. There are coatings and surface finishing that help the components rpm quicker and shed oil so there is less windage and oil drag. You guys can talk bigger cams, more gear, higher shift points, etc, etc......truly, seriously powerful N/A engines are an art form and border on a black art.
Who is spinning there 3V motor the highest?
I think I am.... Ive hit 7500 lol