Boaisy
Dark Knight
I'm loving mine since December, even with the snowy weather the past couple of days. It is nice and smooth vs. stock setup. Just itchin' to get more track time with it.
I'm loving mine since December, even with the snowy weather the past couple of days. It is nice and smooth vs. stock setup. Just itchin' to get more track time with it.
So what advantages do these offer over another brand of shock/strut for street use? Sell me on them!!!!!!
Shorter bodies so you can run inexpensive lowering springs without bottoming out.
We've measured a lot of lowering springs and have selected a few that are appropriate for both the Bilstein valving and have good front-to-rear spring ratios.
The valving is firmer than stock, but it's not a competition setup. These are great for daily drivers, yet they don't fall on their face on track like the stock stuff does.
Bilstein longevity.
Shorter bodies so you can run inexpensive lowering springs without bottoming out.
I don't quite understand why having shorter bodies alone would prevent a lowered car from bottoming, unless the other (e.g., Koni) struts would bottom with the stock springs as well.
Let's say that the amount of available vertical travel with the stock ride height and "other" dampers is 4 inches from ride height to fully compressed, and another 3 inches from ride height to fully extended, for 7 inches total travel. Now you lower your car by an inch. Your available vertical travel in compression is now 3 inches. With these "other" dampers, the available vertical travel in extension is now 4 inches. All you're doing is changing the equilibrium point in the range of travel.
Let's say the Bilsteins are shorter by an inch, and it is shorter such that the distance from (lowered) ride height to full extension is 3 inches, and the distance from ride height to full compression is also 3 inches.
Well, in that case, compression distance is equal for both. If the Bilsteins aren't bottoming, then why would the "other" dampers necessarily bottom?
Yes, the new ride height results in the equilibrium point being centered in the range (or, perhaps, maintaining the same ratio of extension range to compression range). But how is that itself any benefit whatsoever?
Hell, the STOCK suspension does that when you really push the car.... and makes the Pirelli's act like the cheap ass tires that they are...
Because we don't care about extension, and the compression travel on a bilstein is greater than on a stock- type strut at a lowered ride height
So stock type struts will bottom with stock springs? If not, why not?
If they do, then that's a design flaw for sure, one that I'm happy that Bilstein has corrected.
Not with stock springs, but who wants to run stock springs? Aftermarket springs beyond maybe an inch of lowering will be all over the front bumpstops
Well, with something like a koni yellow, to get the spring rate high enough to not bottom out, you get too much spring for the damper. in a motorsports setting with no regard paid to suspension or damping calculators
Well, with something like a koni yellow, to get the spring rate high enough to not bottom out, you get too much spring for the damper. in a motorsports setting with no regard paid to suspension or damping calculators
So did Sam Strano just drive around on the bumpstops the whole time he was winning national championship(s)?. I mean it is well known he was on the super-low H&R springs. Any insight into that?