.
I am getting ready to start putting parts aside to do a 200 MPH GT build. Not a car that will do 200 in a standing mile, but capable of top speeds of high 190's - low 200's. I am shooting for around 600-650 RWHP to do it. I am looking for some input from folks who may have built some road track cars or standing mile drag cars who have GT's capable of doing 200 MPH.
So, I really like my GT500... and it can do 200, but I don't want to fuck it up while doing high speed racing. GT's are everywhere and if I pop the engine or trans, I am not going to be so heart broken over having to replace parts since a GT is not a numbered car. However, I love the gearing of the TR6060, as I can do 70 MPH in first and 110 MPH in second. I want to get that kind of gearing without spending $5k-$7k on a built TR6060.
Something I noticed in the TR6060 has gear that are on average about 25% more shallow than the stock MT82. Both cars have 3.31 gears. The big gear difference appears to all be in the trans.
So, what I was thinking is getting a rear gear that is about 25% more shallow instead. It's a lot cheaper, and I am assuming it will have the same result. What is troubling me is, that is a 2.48:1 rear gear ratio, which seems way too low for a practical application for a 650 RWHP car.
So, my questions are; for those who have built them...
1.) with a clutch assembly upgrade, is the stock Mt82 stout enough for 650 RWHP? (Roush and Whipple say yes, but what have you found)
2.) is a 2.48 gear a bad choice for what I want to do? Is something like a 3.08 or 2.7x better for acceleration while still getting to that 200 MPH benchmark?
3.) I am not seeing anything lower than a 3.08 for the 8.8. Are gears available numerically lower than a 3.08 for the 8.8 rear?
Thanks in advance...
Spaz
I am getting ready to start putting parts aside to do a 200 MPH GT build. Not a car that will do 200 in a standing mile, but capable of top speeds of high 190's - low 200's. I am shooting for around 600-650 RWHP to do it. I am looking for some input from folks who may have built some road track cars or standing mile drag cars who have GT's capable of doing 200 MPH.
So, I really like my GT500... and it can do 200, but I don't want to fuck it up while doing high speed racing. GT's are everywhere and if I pop the engine or trans, I am not going to be so heart broken over having to replace parts since a GT is not a numbered car. However, I love the gearing of the TR6060, as I can do 70 MPH in first and 110 MPH in second. I want to get that kind of gearing without spending $5k-$7k on a built TR6060.
Something I noticed in the TR6060 has gear that are on average about 25% more shallow than the stock MT82. Both cars have 3.31 gears. The big gear difference appears to all be in the trans.
So, what I was thinking is getting a rear gear that is about 25% more shallow instead. It's a lot cheaper, and I am assuming it will have the same result. What is troubling me is, that is a 2.48:1 rear gear ratio, which seems way too low for a practical application for a 650 RWHP car.
So, my questions are; for those who have built them...
1.) with a clutch assembly upgrade, is the stock Mt82 stout enough for 650 RWHP? (Roush and Whipple say yes, but what have you found)
2.) is a 2.48 gear a bad choice for what I want to do? Is something like a 3.08 or 2.7x better for acceleration while still getting to that 200 MPH benchmark?
3.) I am not seeing anything lower than a 3.08 for the 8.8. Are gears available numerically lower than a 3.08 for the 8.8 rear?
Thanks in advance...
Spaz