PAX looks more reasonable now @ .837 too.
Where did that come from?
PAX looks more reasonable now @ .837 too.
Spherical bearing in the diff is a no-no in STP, fyi.
If it makes you feel any better, your coilovers put you in SM too.
If you are trying to be competitive, I wouldn't use the NT05's.
Really? Under brake, steering, and suspension allowances for CAM it states "components, lines, hoses, and methods of attachment are unrestricted."
The words "components" and "unrestricted" makes it sound like I can have coilovers in that class. Is there a caveat somewhere I missed?
NT05s are 200 UTQG, the minimum tread wear you can have for CAM. Unfortunate for me, I already bought the tires in preparation for running CAM. Additionally, a couple of the fastest guys in my region run NT05s. Further more, they were priced well and available at the time of purchase. No, I won't be competitive in SM with NT05s or really anything other than slicks but again, unfortunately for me I already bought them in preparation for another class that I now can't compete in.
Really? Under brake, steering, and suspension allowances for CAM it states "components, lines, hoses, and methods of attachment are unrestricted."
The words "components" and "unrestricted" makes it sound like I can have coilovers in that class. Is there a caveat somewhere I missed?
in the 200tw category, the Rival S's and RE-71R's are the tires to have, depending on what width and size you need. the NT05 is old tech at this point for CAM usage.
What I meant was...even if you removed your cams to run ESP or STP or something, running a relocated rear spring would bump you to SM (or CP?).
Suspension is wide open in CAM.
I totally agree however, price and availability were the two deciding factors on the NT05s. For $800 and the fact that they were in the size I wanted, I bought them.