Whiskey11
SCCA Autoscrosser #23 STU
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Posts
- 1,644
- Reaction score
- 2
BMR already has one for the Camaro owners
On to a serious question / clarification on the chassis vs differential mounted watts link:
I know there's a difference in sprung vs unsprung mass.
I respect norm, but sometimes its like he's speaking Chinese.
Am I understanding him that a diff mounted unit will have less roll steer and essentially do its job without using the suspension at all? I assume that makes (although my butt dyno isn't calibrated that high) the diff mounted unit superior as far as handling characteristics are concerned?
Can someone explain it in window licker terms please?
Ehhh... there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods. The biggest difference between the two is how body roll is produced. On a chassis mounted unit the RC and CG are fixed relative to each other. This means that at a given lateral load the body roll should be consistent.
With a diff mounted unit the RC is fixed height relative to the ground but not to the CG. This means that the RC and CG are constantly getting closer and further apart from each other. The end result is a progressive amount of body roll and one that changes with ride height fluctuations. If you have the same static RC as a chassis mount unit, at the same lateral load with everything else about the vehicles the same, the chassis mount should produce slightly less body roll as the arm length between the CG and RC remains constant whereas it will change in length with the diff mounted unit.
I think at the end of the day, Norm was of the opinion that there might be a slight edge to a chassis mounted unit from a tuning standpoint. Either is far superior to a PHB.