Comp 127400

aleborjas

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
490
Reaction score
0
Location
Maracaibo, Venezuela
hi what you all think about this cams on a stock short block just stage 2 heads and springs and phasers, long tubes, 4.30 gears, jlt intake, manual, and regular bolt on's, just whant power and torque dont whant race car sound... so dont tell me hot rods or thumpers...
 

weeloGT

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Posts
302
Reaction score
0
Location
Little Rock. AR
127600 would be better however he said he didnt want that race car sound, so the thumpers wont be as bad, however i agree with lightblade, you wont be getting full use out of your heads
 

US-1

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
12,808
Reaction score
183
Location
The ShadowLands
hi what you all think about this cams on a stock short block just stage 2 heads and springs and phasers, long tubes, 4.30 gears, jlt intake, manual, and regular bolt on's, just whant power and torque dont whant race car sound... so dont tell me hot rods or thumpers...
About time someone figured these cams out. Best kept secret in the line for N/A cars.

127600 would be better however he said he didnt want that race car sound, so the thumpers wont be as bad, however i agree with lightblade, you wont be getting full use out of your heads
You'd be surprised.
 

aleborjas

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
490
Reaction score
0
Location
Maracaibo, Venezuela
i dont like to go too big on cam because of torque the is complete stock weight even 2 JL amps and 2 ARC audio 12" subs... and for the track i will use 26" slicks
 

AlbertD

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Posts
2,538
Reaction score
6
Location
Tucson, AZ
hi what you all think about this cams on a stock short block just stage 2 heads and springs and phasers, long tubes, 4.30 gears, jlt intake, manual, and regular bolt on's, just whant power and torque dont whant race car sound... so dont tell me hot rods or thumpers...

I think you will be satisfied with those cams, idle won't be as drastic as the 127500's or 127600's and you will still get some really decent power out of them. I have the 127500's in right now with P&P heads and the idle isn't that bad at all, so I would imagine the 127400's being alot tamer. Would probably be a good sleeper cam :naughty1:
 

US-1

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
12,808
Reaction score
183
Location
The ShadowLands
Check the duration numbers vs. the lift figures. Lots of lift, lower duration and a relatively tight lobe sep number (112). Excellent cylinder filling so you end up with much higher cylinder pressures than you would with the 127500 or 127600 cams. This will yield much more torque.
 

aleborjas

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
490
Reaction score
0
Location
Maracaibo, Venezuela
Check the duration numbers vs. the lift figures. Lots of lift, lower duration and a relatively tight lobe sep number (112). Excellent cylinder filling so you end up with much higher cylinder pressures than you would with the 127500 or 127600 cams. This will yield much more torque.

that's what i want :naughty1: for drag racing you need torque to move a heavy car out of the hole... should be a torquie cam :thumb:
 

Rasmus

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Posts
2,295
Reaction score
27

I looked up the difference in the two springs, and the 125's have a higher spring rate and seat load than the 113's. What kind of impact would that have on a motor running 127400's or 127300's? A bit harder on the heads?
 

ShadowLands

Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Posts
199
Reaction score
1
Location
The ShadowLands
Not really needed unless you're running 10 passes every single time the track is open and/or you are running an entire points season in something like NMRA. For an average street/strip car the 26113-24 springs are fine.
 

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,631
Reaction score
494
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
The mentality that more head flow requires more duration is a tough one to break.
For a streetable combo, a more efficient head requires less cam duration to fill the chamber than a stock heads does.
 
Last edited:

ShadowLands

Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Posts
199
Reaction score
1
Location
The ShadowLands
With this type of profile it isn't really a matter of "more cylinder head flow." What these cams achieve with their profile is cylinder charging. By opening the valve over .500" but not holding it open very long allows you to move the valve opening points around to a point where you get increased cylinder pressure. More cylinder pressure, more power potential. The specs on these cams also show that low speed torque production and off-idle/part throttle response will be excellent.
 

RED09GT

Equal Opportunity Offender
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Posts
2,631
Reaction score
494
Location
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
With this type of profile it isn't really a matter of "more cylinder head flow." What these cams achieve with their profile is cylinder charging. By opening the valve over .500" but not holding it open very long allows you to move the valve opening points around to a point where you get increased cylinder pressure. More cylinder pressure, more power potential. The specs on these cams also show that low speed torque production and off-idle/part throttle response will be excellent.
Either way, having ported heads does not require to go near the bottom of the page to find the right cam, that's the point that is missed on these boards.
 

Latest posts

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top