Unless you are on Dot-R tires or slicks, I'd start with a 450f/175r and a stiff front bar.
This assumes the rear springs are in the stock location, not an outboard coilover, and that you have taken care of alignment issues with bushings, camber plates, and an adjustable PHB or Watts and rear arm relocators if you are lowered.
Sounds like a lot? Start with springs and a front bar and then address the rest of it as you get tired of being held back.
Unless you are on Dot-R tires or slicks, I'd start with a 450f/175r and a stiff front bar.
This assumes the rear springs are in the stock location, not an outboard coilover, and that you have taken care of alignment issues with bushings, camber plates, and an adjustable PHB or Watts and rear arm relocators if you are lowered.
Sounds like a lot? Start with springs and a front bar and then address the rest of it as you get tired of being held back.
I think I asked this before but I will ask again, because I don't know if I got a straight answer
Would 350 front 250 Rear be a good place to start, or am I starting too far off. I'd rather get close in my driveway then tune from there, I don't have access to a track constantly, I have to drive pretty far, and I don't have much time there once I do get there..
I also have some 225 springs, I could run in the rear. I didn't really notice a problem in ride comfort with 250 rear but if its hindering my performance, they have to go.
I'm not trying to pick on you, but it seems like that spring package is what you are going to use, regardless of advice. Just know that people with plenty of competitive S197 track and testing experience have tried to warn you away from that 350F/250R set-up.
Dean from Rehagen says "I have not seen the specs you're talking about, but the front rates should be close to double the rear. The Boss 302S car is going to be something close to 500 front, 325 rear."
There is no one right answer. One mans garbage is another mans treasure.
What do you think Bilstein knows that Koni does not? Spring rate requires rebound damping to control it. Bilstein's have a set valving, it's not adjustable (see also that they are now making damping adjustable stuff for some of their coil-overs because they know that what they claim isn't really possible)... so how exactly do you square their claim of up to 500 lbs/in including everything less, like stock *without* the ability to adjust? The only way is if they were valved stiff enough to damp the 500, and then you just deal with a shit-ton of rebound that is severely overdamping anything less.
What you are believing is that Bilstein's are magic and can do it all. I'm sorry they can't. If they could, why would they make HD and Sport vavling for a lot of cars? They don't for the Mustang, but they do for a lot of cars and if they could do it all without adjustment there'd be no need to do that, right?
That probably has more to do with the rear dampers and how they handle high shaft speeds than anything. I'm running 375lb rear springs and the ride is not bad at all.My rear spring is roughly 280 and I feel that it is too much. I'm trying to get a less stiff spring. The ride is a bit rough.
That probably has more to do with the rear dampers and how they handle high shaft speeds than anything. I'm running 375lb rear springs and the ride is not bad at all.
Since this turned in to a spring and damper thread. What is a good track spring that will do decent on the street? I'm not to overly concerned with a little rougher ride as I've got rod end suspension. I plan on getting a quality damper most likely koni.
Different springs will be a quick fix and will be changed out before too long
Maybe, maybe not. What rear dampers are you running?
BC Racing Coilovers
BC Racing Coilovers
If the R2's are getting called out on some Chinese stuff at $2200 then those BC's being adjustable monotubes that come with CC plates for $1100 have gotta raise some concern.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk