This^^^^^^
I just did some quick and dirty math.
Intake:
Intake seats above the valve seat 27.94 diameter = 613sq mm x2 = 1226sq mm area
Your new intake opening 2345sq mm
So your intake runner opening to effective valve diameter ratio is about 50%
Even if you could port the area above the valve seat out to the valve size (which you obviously can't) you are still only looking at 1815sq mm of area at the valve end of the runner. Which would still leave you about 23% smaller. In a perfect world the valve end of the runner would be slightly bigger.
So it looks like you are going to want to get every bit you can out of the runners right above the valve seats. You can't make them too big.
Exhaust:
Exhaust ports above the valve seat 27.94mm = 613sq mm
Your new exhaust opening 1892 sq mm
So your exhaust runner opening to effective valve diameter ratio is about 30%
Even if you could port the area above the valve seat out to the valve size (which you obviously can't) you are still only looking at 1104sq mm of area at the valve end of the runner. Which would still leave you about 42% smaller. In a perfect world the valve end of the runner would be slightly smaller than the header end..
So it looks like you are going to want to get every bit you can out of the runners right above the valve seats. Like every bit you can get. You can't make them too big.
On a plus note your intake runner opening vs exhaust runner exit ratio is right at 80/20, which is great. Just gotta get the valve side of the runners a LOT bigger than they are now.
Hope that helps some.