As far as relying on an additive to decrease non-critical coolant temps, OP is barking up the wrong tree. Nutcase is correct. Coolant and additives only support the water in the system. Dumping a bottle of additive in water isn't going to lower your normal operating temps. A lower T-stat will generally lower your normal operating temps, as long as you have the water pump and radiator capacity to back it up.
I'm not sure what you're saying. Isn't dumping a bottle in water to lower operating temps it's purpose? Here's what
Royal Purple claims about purple ice
Look at the columns. Improvement in every column, not just purple ice and water. They claim purple ice and water can reduce temps up to 22 degrees. I'm not sure why it's illogical to think that improving the thermal efficiency of the water in the intercooler loop wouldn't lower ait2f's...I mean, that is what the intercooler loop is for, right? Maybe only a couple of degrees, but worthwhile for a $16 dollar bottle of additive if it works. In addition, if engine temps, which are controlled to a degree of course by coolant temps, which could also conceivably reduce ait2'fs because of the mass of all the components running at a cooler rate and thus reducing the amount or volume of air that is normally heated by merely being within the engine itself, aside from compression by the blower, why would it be illogical to think it would also help to reduce ait2f's?
If running purple ice or water wetter has no cooling effects, what's their purpose? If cooler motors and cooler intercoolers don't promote cooler ait2f's, what does? (I don't know anyone that has control over ambient temps). I've already added a 160* thermostat. During steady state highway driving, the fans really shouldn't need to come on much, right? as they shouldn't need to with the high volume of air flow. It should be the
perfect opportunity for rp or ww to display their thermal capabilities. Maybe I
am barking up the wrong tree, however improving the thermal efficiencies of both cooling systems certainly doesn't
seem unreasonable in an attempt to improve ait2f's, at least not to me. This whole thing started because Royal Purple makes
certain claims. Whether or not there's enough improvement of thermal efficiency in the intercooler loop alone is one thing. However their claim is that it lowers normal engine operating temps, and I saw absolutely zero difference.
The original intent of this thread was my experience with rp and cooler engine temps. In the long run of course, reducing aits was the original goal, but primarily this thread is/was about
engines running cooler with the addition of purple ice. In that regard, my hope was that purple ice would keep coolant temps in the low 190's in a steady state situation, rather than the upper 190's that I experience now. In that regard, compared to the manufacturers claims, there has been no cooling improvements.
part of the original post:
So I read some about purple ice, and decided that it may help in my attempts to reduce ait2f's. It seemed logical that if I could lower engine coolant temps, that reduced ait2f's could follow.
the italicized portion is my original intention of the thread. again of course, all in an attempt to reduce overall ait2f's
Here is the thing: Until you exceed the capacity of your radiator and water pump a coolant additive CAN'T help you.
While this might be correct, it's not detailed anywhere on rp's website. Their assertion is that it lowers engine operating temps, to some degree, depending on factors, but always an improvement (at least that is what is inferred). If there isn't an opportunity for improvement, those situations should be detailed in order not to promote
false advertising.