Stock Cams??

S197gt07

forum member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Posts
4,064
Reaction score
1
Location
Newburyport, MA
There is a great list in Jeremy's cam tech thread with a bunch of different specs from all different cams

That should be stickied as well as the fuel injector one.
 

Davenow

forum member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin TX
193/216 @ .050" .433/.433 lsa 117.25


What are Hot Rods?

Is there a list anywhere of the specs on the popular cams?

I suppose I could make one... Hmm




*edit* Look what I found :) (Ill add the specs you posted as well)


F150 5.4 3V 176/199 @ .050" .436/.439 lift LSA unknown

4.5 3V 193/216 @ .050" .433/.433 lift LSA 117.25

BBR stage 1 227/233 @ .050" duration, .480/.480 lift, 114 LSA

Comp Cam XFI NSR stage 2 222/235 @.50” duration, .450/.450 lift, 115.5 LSA

Comp Cam XFI VSR stage 1 214/227 @.50” duration, .480/.470, 114 LSA

Comp Cam XFI VSR stage 2 230/232 @.50” duration, .475/.450, 116 LSA

FRPP Hot Rod Cams 221/240 @.50” duration, 472/472 lift, 110 LSA

Thumpers 127010 226/246 @.50" duration, .450/.450 lift, 109 LSA

Mutha Thumpers 127020 234/254 @.50" duration, .450/.450 lift, 109 LSA

Comp Cam NSR Blower grind stage 1 127055 214/231 @.50 duration, .450/.450, 100 LSA

Comp Cam NSR Blower grind Stage 2 127205 222/239 @.50 duration, .450/.450, 116.5 LSA











Anyone know the specs on any of the other common cams? Ill post what I can find. Any requests?


*edited to fix the 205s data*
 
Last edited:

S197gt07

forum member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Posts
4,064
Reaction score
1
Location
Newburyport, MA
It doesn't shoot a hole in any theory, since those specs for the 205's are wrong.

The LSA is 116.5, also, no way in hell the stage 1's are a 100 LSA, thats super wrong too.
 

Davenow

forum member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin TX
Davenow. Theres is alot of wrong data in your post, 109/110 lsa is less than idea for forced induction. See the cam tech thread for a list of specs.

http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=62653&highlight=cam+tech+thread


I got the comp cams info off comps web site.

I know I got that one with the 116.5 wrong. I dont know where I got that number, I was looking at the page, I saw the number, and it just didnt make it to my fingers on my keyboard.



As for the less than ideal.

I am a bit tired of people pointing that out, when I very clearly say it. I am not like coming at you specifically with that (so please dont take it that way) , I'm just saying its a little disheartening when I say something, then someone comes and says it to me like I dont know what I am talking about because I dont know it. When I just said it :( They arent giving me some new info lol. I have always said an NA cam isnt IDEAL for a blower, however, and this is what I have been saying, it can, and does work, provided you dont go nuts on the NA cam.


That said, I REALLY dont want to be putting bad data out there. So other than the 205s, which I fixed now, what else is wrong? So that I can go fix it :)
 
Last edited:

Davenow

forum member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin TX
, 109/110 lsa is less than idea for forced induction



Please note the NA cams with 115.5 and 116 LSA.

The reason I point that out is that LSA seems to be the hot-button when people talk about NA vs Blower grinds.

I know one isnt ideal for both applications. However, what I am saying is that both CAN work, with both applications, provided you arent going to a more aggressive cam (more aggressive than mild)
 
Last edited:

BruceH

BBB Big Bore Boss 322
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Posts
13,801
Reaction score
14
Location
Pacific Northwest
It doesn't shoot a hole in any theory, since those specs for the 205's are wrong.

The LSA is 116.5, also, no way in hell the stage 1's are a 100 LSA, thats super wrong too.

115 lsa for the 127055 cams. I can see what Dave did, he typed the centerline instead of lsa.

Comp has a nice pdf on 3v cams here: http://www.compcams.com/3valve/COMP5-124.pdf
 

JeremyH

3V Fuel Guru
S197 Team Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Posts
20,857
Reaction score
197
Location
Virginia Beach
What are Hot Rods?

Is there a list anywhere of the specs on the popular cams?

I suppose I could make one... Hmm




*edit* Look what I found :) (Ill add the specs you posted as well)


F150 5.4 3V 176/199 @ .050" .436/.439 lift LSA unknown

4.5 3V 193/216 @ .050" .433/.433 lift LSA 117.25

BBR stage 1 227/233 @ .050" duration, .480/.480 lift, 114 LSA

Comp Cam XFI NSR stage 2 222/235 @.50” duration, .450/.450 lift, 115.5 LSA

Comp Cam XFI VSR stage 1 214/227 @.50” duration, .480/.470, 114 LSA

Comp Cam XFI VSR stage 2230/232 @.50” duration, .475/.450, 116 LSA

FRPP Hot Rod Cams 221/240 @.50” duration, 472/472 lift, 110 LSA

Thumpers 127010 226/246 @.50" duration, .450/.450 lift, 109 LSA

Mutha Thumpers 127020 234/254 @.50" duration, .450/.450 lift, 109 LSA

Comp Cam NSR Blower grind stage 1 127055 214/231 @.50 duration, .450/.450, 100 LSA

Comp Cam NSR Blower grind Stage 2 127205 222/239 @.50 duration, .450/.450, 116.5 LSA











Anyone know the specs on any of the other common cams? Ill post what I can find. Any requests?


*edited to fix the 205s data*


What I saw off the top of my head I highlighted in red.


Na cams work great with blowers the stock cams are na. Whe the lsa is too small/tighter it does not work great with boost (cams in the 109-110 range) for many reasons but mainly it restricts flow due to the increase in time both valves are closed. Not a big deal on a na car but with boost its very evident. The only gain here is up top/peak due to increased lift, but power under the curve is affected. 113-116 is more acceptable for a boosted car.

http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1158205&postcount=14
 
Last edited:

streetyme

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Posts
16
Reaction score
0
Hello , I have Anderson Motorsports cams for FI .. The cam # is AF-F43L and the specs are 215/232 @ .050 , advertised duration is 257/274,
timing events -5/35.5 intake 52/0 exhaust lobe lift is .245/.245 gross lift is .495/.495 with a 112 LS. This cam can use stock valve springs,but needs phaser lockouts.
 

Davenow

forum member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin TX
What do you think about Hot Rods VS Motha Thumpers power wise, on an NA car?


I love my Hot Rods, but I am always looking to change things around and if the MTs will pick up enough power, then I may consider it.

The other question is how are MTs going to be driveability wise with an Automatic on 4.10s but stock converter? I know the 4.10s will help, but with the stock converter I am concerned about driveability...

I dont even know if I want to bother with it. I am happy with the HRs, but the MTs seem to lope a little harder, and if they make a little more power.....
 

Davenow

forum member
Joined
Jul 2, 2011
Posts
202
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin TX
What I saw off the top of my head I highlighted in red.


Na cams work great with blowers the stock cams are na. Whe the lsa is too small/tighter it does not work great with boost (cams in the 109-110 range) for many reasons but mainly it restricts flow due to the increase in time both valves are closed. Not a big deal on a na car but with boost its very evident. The only gain here is up top/peak due to increased lift, but power under the curve is affected. 113-116 is more acceptable for a boosted car.

http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1158205&postcount=14




As for the stuff you highlighted, some of it I cut/pasted from other threads, like the 4.5 thing and such. I dont remember if I looked the specs on that other cam up or copied/pasted.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top