6R80 transbrake you say?

[CPRsm]

And? You're bringing up posts made publicly, and acting like something is trying to be hid here. Only reason you know anything is because he posted it publicly lol
Nobody's back tracking. If ford has a preventative measure for line pressure it will probably be fine. Yet Deuce and Ken both know about it, and ford put in a restriction of sorts,.....yet line pressure plays no role? FUD right? lol
Like I said, full retard.

 

[wbt]

Making more lies Dustin? How many do I have to catch you in?

I realize they both need a lap dog to post here so maybe that's not your opinion. I gave them the option but wbt back pedaled once I made him the offer I'll make you. Put your money where your mouth is kid. Is 2k cheap enough of a bet for you to take? I've got that much that says the brake holds WOT. Because my "cute little box" doesn't have 8 wires it must not hold. Since he couldn't figure out how to do it with less, mine doesn't work. Hurry up w your answer

http://www.svtperformance.com/forum...ake-no-purchase-necessary-6.html#post13766768

Show me exactly where I backpedaled? Either:
1. You are hurting for money
2. Delusional
3. Both

How about that list of tuners?
How about that line pressure?

Toilet is getting louder by the day.

 

[86GT351]

Pic or video from the track with a tire please!

 

[kdanner]

Pic or video from the track with a tire please!

Not open this week. Plan is to be there next week.

 

[beefcake]

Making more lies Dustin? How many do I have to catch you in?



http://www.svtperformance.com/forum...ake-no-purchase-necessary-6.html#post13766768

Show me exactly where I backpedaled? Either:
1. You are hurting for money
2. Delusional
3. Both

How about that list of tuners?
How about that line pressure?

Toilet is getting louder by the day.

And, his turbo kit @ 19.5 psi made less than a Paxton kit at similar boost!!!!!!

also, found this online, looks like kris just posted it up

says this one doesn't raise line pressure, but not optimal. Just a quick show for everyone.

 

[86GT351]

Not open this week. Plan is to be there next week.

South Florida FTW! 12 months a year Racing!

 

[rcm90]

And, his turbo kit @ 19.5 psi made less than a Paxton kit at similar boost!!!!!!

Where did you see this? Or where are the sheets?

 

[kdanner]

South Florida FTW! 12 months a year Racing!

I can't complain about the local track being open 51 weeks a year.

 

[weather man]

Our DA is great! Traction....not so much

 

[Chris5.0]

Lol hhahaha

 

[CPRsm]

Making more lies Dustin? How many do I have to catch you in?



http://www.svtperformance.com/forum...ake-no-purchase-necessary-6.html#post13766768

Show me exactly where I backpedaled? Either:
1. You are hurting for money
2. Delusional
3. Both

How about that list of tuners?
How about that line pressure?

Toilet is getting louder by the day.

You said you proved it did WOT better than mine in your video. Your can't even hold higher than 4k lol. That drawing won't hold shit. I offered you a chance to shut me up and make some money and you won't take it. You skipped right over it.

Hurting for money? I've sold 3 kits this month. I wonder if I owe any of it to either of you and your stunts.Seems to drive them right to me lol. That doesn't include the engine install or restoration sitting in my shop.

And, his turbo kit @ 19.5 psi made less than a Paxton kit at similar boost!!!!!!

LOL. You still comparing your ported heads, after market cams "other than stock" intake to a stock intake, stock cammed, stock headed car? I wouldn't be bragging that he made anywhere near what you did if I were you lol. Similarly built to yours, Bob made close to 200rwhp more than you did. That was thru the air filter, over running the intercooler!! Hence the reason I make the dual core bitch now. Even though you said he made less on Evo's dyno. He corrected your lies for you on SVT.

http://www.svtperformance.com/forum...0hp-cpr-single-aluminator-4.html#post13768240

You want to say dyno number don't matter and the first thing you do is bring it up in a customers thread. Since Bob has corrected what you thought, I'm good knowing he made 150+rwhp more at peak. Dasan even 150rwhp+ more than you at 5500 and still made similar to your built engine DESPITE the stock intake. Keep grabbing at straws.

 

[BruceH]

And, his turbo kit @ 19.5 psi made less than a Paxton kit at similar boost!!!!!!

And this has what to do with the topic?

 

[wbt]

You said you proved it did WOT better than mine in your video. Your can't even hold higher than 4k lol. That drawing won't hold shit. I offered you a chance to shut me up and make some money and you won't take it. You skipped right over it.

I said we went WOT and held at a higher RPM. Get the facts straight or do we need to chalk that up to more mis-information/understanding?

You confirmed that his car did not launch at WOT and is seen in the video that is clearly isn't.
http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1932315&postcount=37

It was then he launched the car on 4lbs. then he says he can get 5lbs. on the tbrake and now you are claiming 6.
http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1933637&postcount=17

You guys can't keep your own stories straight. The toilet is on constant flush now.

BTW - me skipping over your petty bets means I am backpedaling? LOL! Bottom line is that has become a trend with you when painted into a corner.

 

[CPRsm]

I said we went WOT and held at a higher RPM. Get the facts straight or do we need to chalk that up to more mis-information/understanding?

Do you not understand your own posts?
You said you wanted something more effective. Which means you think yours works better than mine.

Just like your setup Dustin but wanted something more effective.

What we have shown that is different:
1. 2-step and transbrake working at the same time
2. WOT
3. Car holding at a higher RPM

.....enjoying the asshurt.

You assumed yours worked better because you think you've wired it the same as me. Your drawing won't work. So all your assumtions are wrong from the get. Secondly as I've explained once before, holding at a higher rpm means nothing. All that matters is how much torque it can hold. You're testing isn't holding any where near what ours is holding. Could your hold the same? Maybe if it works better than the drawing posted. But as of right now you haven't done anything better than we have. And by what Danner says, your good version won't hold above 4k. There's no way it's holding a boosted car if it can't hold an N/A car.

You confirmed that his car did not launch at WOT and is seen in the video that is clearly isn't.

Again, traction dictates throttle position and boost on launch. Just by your posts you can tell you've never race anything w more power than that N/A coyote or you would know exactly what I mean. It holds WOT despite him not launching on it.

It was then he launched the car on 4lbs. then he says he can get 5lbs. on the tbrake and now you are claiming 6.

Again what he has seen the car hold, and what he's actually launched with are two different things. Refer to post above for your clarification as to why.

BTW - me skipping over your petty bets means I am backpedaling? LOL! Bottom line is that has become a trend with you when painted into a corner.

You back pedaled because you make a claim and aren't willing to back it up. Your brake doesn't hold better than ours. We can't hold WOT, etc. You run around in circles trying pull up pointless posts trying not to face the obvious.

 

[wbt]

Do you not understand your own posts?
You said you wanted something more effective. Which means you think yours works better than mine.

You assumed yours worked better because you think you've wired it the same as me. Your drawing won't work. So all your assumtions are wrong from the get. Secondly as I've explained once before, holding at a higher rpm means nothing. All that matters is how much torque it can hold. You're testing isn't holding any where near what ours is holding. Could your hold the same? Maybe if it works better than the drawing posted. But as of right now you haven't done anything better than we have. And by what Danner says, your good version won't hold above 4k. There's no way it's holding a boosted car if it can't hold an N/A car.

Again, traction dictates throttle position and boost on launch. Just by your posts you can tell you've never race anything w more power than that N/A coyote or you would know exactly what I mean. It holds WOT despite him not launching on it.

Again what he has seen the car hold, and what he's actually launched with are two different things. Refer to post above for your clarification as to why.

You back pedaled because you make a claim and aren't willing to back it up. Your brake doesn't hold better than ours. We can't hold WOT, etc. You run around in circles trying pull up pointless posts trying not to face the obvious.

1. Your buddy wasn't at WOT and didn't launch at WOT. Why?
2. You claim we have to use a 2 step to get the car to sit at 4K. Wrong.
3. I didn't backpedal one bit but in your own little world you can believe that.

Toilet is now on auto-flush.

 

[CPRsm]

1. Your buddy wasn't at WOT and didn't launch at WOT. Why?

Your not really that dense. You act too smart on here. There's no way. I've explained it more than a few times. TWICE in the post above you. Do you not read the posts? Can we get someone in here to translate for you? I don't have the skill set required to break it any easier than this. TRACTION! A car leaves softer if not WOT.

Again, traction dictates throttle position and boost on launch. Just by your posts you can tell you've never race anything w more power than that N/A coyote or you would know exactly what I mean. It holds WOT despite him not launching on it.

Again what he has seen the car hold, and what he's actually launched with are two different things. Refer to post above for your clarification as to why.

2. You claim we have to use a 2 step to get the car to sit at 4K. Wrong.

Then please correct me if I'm wrong. If I am my bad, I'll admit it. But I asked him if his 3 relay setup was holding, this was his response. Because to me it looks like he is saying when the car starts to push against the converter and transfer more power to the input shaft, it won't hold. So a lower stall will have problems at a lower rpm. Or a higher powered car, especially turbo, is going to cause some real problems when if pushes against the converter w 300ft/lbs more than his engine. A turbo NEEDS that load against the converter to spool. Tell me that's not what he meant and I'll apologize and edit my posts. I don't need to make shit up. That was my honest take on his reply.

Dustin Gregory it went WOT and you know it from seeing the video. Somewhere north of 4k it doesn't hold, when the converter can't stall any higher and due to that the brake has a lot more torque to have to hold. This car will never even leave the line at 4k, so it does more than enough.

 

[86GT351]

I can't complain about the local track being open 51 weeks a year.

LOL!

 

[ecoboost]

So someone makes a tbrake but don't want to sell. Some one else makes one that seems to hold better from video's of each. Yet Kdanner can't be right..HMM..

My question is I wonder if this can be used on the ecoboost F150's. To let you actually build some boost off the line wit out doing a convertor.

 

[CPRsm]

So someone makes a tbrake but don't want to sell. Some one else makes one that seems to hold better from video's of each. Yet Kdanner can't be right..HMM..

What makes you think one holds better than the other? Did you see Chris's car budge at all? Honest question.
Honestly if you think it's right how he posted it up, wire it up

If the eceboost runs a 6R80 it's probably the same. Pinout might be a bit different at the ecu.

 

[Bud]

Don't the f150's have a TCM separate from the ECM, not sure how that would play into strategy and wiring.

This kind of makes me want an ecoboost f150 more now...damnit