lol not just a forum this shit is going on across three forums now...hard to keep up with it all
No shit it's Dustin vs Texas and an Ecoboost owner.
lol not just a forum this shit is going on across three forums now...hard to keep up with it all
Thats the stupidest thing I have read all day. I guess suspension has no effect on 60ft. Its a stock suspension car. Plus everyone knows its harder to 60ft a turbo car then a n/a car that has 400tq. Not only just that he has only a handful of passes on the setup. Give him a break and use your head.
Yeah, I just have a handful on mine too. I see other turbo transbrake cars putting down killer sixties, and non transbrake turbo cars putting down sixties very similar to his. Glad I didn't drop 8 grand on a box of parts to produce NA ETs/sixties.
And I 60' very similar to your numbers with a 3v N/A. Glad I didn't drop money on a brand new 5.0 and then another XX amount on a Boss motor...
...that drags your turbo down the 1/4 mile. Don't act like I have some pricey car either. $28k for the car, then bought the Boss engine and sold the stock one for about a $1500 difference. You wouldn't have done that if you had the same opportunity?
Don't forget all your other parts and money you've spent lightening the car up. Let's not forget that. It's all taken you how many years to get to that ET and 60? That's literally the BEST you can do. Chris slaps a kit on and does what you do on accident. All the while the car twists, lifts and goes every which a way but foward on launch. And in a heavier car no less....that drags your turbo down the 1/4 mile. Don't act like I have some pricey car either. $28k for the car, then bought the Boss engine and sold the stock one for about a $1500 difference. You wouldn't have done that if you had the same opportunity?
No shit it's Dustin vs Texas and an Ecoboost owner.
Sorry a turbo car with lots more power should be killing an n/a car. Even with stock suspension cause the mustangs do great with stock suspension. Guys have went mid 9s with it. We talking a 460whp(guess) vs 650whp(guessing low) and turbo car having least 220wtq more. Even with same 60ft turbo should ET lot better.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
And I 60' very similar to your numbers with a 3v N/A. Glad I didn't drop money on a brand new 5.0 and then another XX amount on a Boss motor...

Stick cars are much easier to 60' than an auto car until you've gone very far with the auto.
My 08 GT500, pulley, tune, slicks, 4.10's, 1.39's.
When you can dump the clutch at 6-7k, your gonna 60'
We are talking 60' junior...Looking at sigs he is half a second faster and traps 3mph more then your turbo car. Yet you say you was faster. So you went from n/a being faster to a turbo slow car?
Yep my 2011 manual 60ft 1.5's with just bolt ons, 4.10's and DR's.
We are talking 60' junior...
Yea and...I did that with a bolt on 3v. So like I said some where around 100 horsepower less.
And I did it full weight. And as said 60ft is easy in manual. 7k launch and boom great 60ft. Don't need lot power. Its rest that of the slip that speaks. And think now your tutbod car is .6 and 9mph off my sc 5.0 still full weight of 3800lbs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
Fuck no, that's not how S197 rolls. Expecting Darren in here any minute w a meme lol
If you guys have any questions fire away. Nothing to hide. Done answering the stupid repetitive shit over and over though.
Fuck no, that's not how S197 rolls. Expecting Darren in here any minute w a meme lol
If you guys have any questions fire away. Nothing to hide. Done answering the stupid repetitive shit over and over though.