New Whiteline front and rear sway bar setup

RJdude3

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Posts
33
Reaction score
0
I recently bought a new set of Whiteline front and rear sway bars and was looking for a good starting point to set the bars up. The last track day I went to the car had a horrible push to, even with some throttle coming out of the corner I had a hard time getting the rear end to rotate.

Current suspension parts on the car:
Ford Racing shocks/struts
Eibach sportlines
BFG Sport Comp 2's 245/55 front/rear
GT500 Brembos
Tubular rear control arms upper/lowers
Adjustable panhard bar

I have a track day on Tuesday coming up and wanted to see what people liked as far as the mounting holes on the ends of the bars.

Thanks!
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Posts
3,615
Reaction score
316
Location
RIP - You will be missed
I would start out either with both full soft (holes nearest the ends of the arms) or both in the next firmer holes. Bring a pair of ramps so you that any adjustments between sessions are easier.

Either way, I think you're going to be better off adjusting 'up' (stiffer) in the early stages of tuning, and adjust both bars. When you're somewhere near where the amount of roll feels like it's being controlled well enough would be when you start tinkering with one bar only to home in on your preferred 'balance'. Be sure to check for behavior under a few "drop-throttle" conditions.

That's one approach; there are others.


Norm
 

Sky Render

Stig's Retarded Cousin
S197 Team Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2011
Posts
9,463
Reaction score
357
Location
NW of Baltimore, MD
The rear bar is easier to adjust; you can do it with the car still on the ground. Just an FYI. That's a nice feature of the rear Whiteline bar.
 

Vorshlag-Fair

Official Site Vendor
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Posts
1,592
Reaction score
107
Location
Dallas, TX
Good question by the OP. The best way to see what the "right" settings are for the two adjustable swaybars is to do an autocross or track test. I assume you are using an S197, as you mention GT500 brakes. Here is how we did autocross testing on our S197 Mustang after adding the adjustable Whiteline swaybars. This is copied from my August 31, 2012 post in our S197 project build thread.

========

August 30, 2012 - Private Autocross Testing

We had not autocrossed the Mustang since the late May "Spring Nationals" at Lincoln, so yesterday we did twelve autocrosses worth of runs at a private test event. With the 315/35/18 Kumho V710s still mounted on the Forgestar 18x11/12 wheels from the late June track day event, and located farther inboard by 1/2" from before, we loaded the Mustang onto the trailer and crammed in all of our gear. We brought more tools and equipment than we ever have, with a generator and air compressor, air tools, multiple floor jacks, extra springs, and all of our normal gear + our Farmtech timing system. We were loaded for war!

DSC4171-L.jpg


Like on our August 2nd Test in Brianne's Pikes Peak Subaru where I got to drive that beast around an improvised road course at 130+ mph, we rented the "Mineral Ring" once again. Getting this 62 acre paved site on a week day is a breeze if you know the right person to call, so we headed out yesterday with the Mustang and our gear. Its 2+ hours each way from our shop to this facility in Mineral Wells, TX, and it always ends up being a battle to miss traffic across Dallas and Ft. Worth along the route. We hit 8 am traffic leaving and 5 pm traffic coming back, but we got a lot accomplished in about 10 hours.



Once we arrived we set up the old "Hollis Test Course" that was painted on the site for the past 6 years or so. Laid out about 50 cones, set-up the timers, and unloaded the Mustang. Conditions for August in Texas were as perfect as they get: sunny and clear with 88°F tempts and a nice 10-15 mph breeze all day. It crept up to 98°F by 2 pm but it was still pretty comfortable, considering it wasn't 110°F with a dead calm.

DSC4375-copy-L.jpg


We started with a quick alignment check, setting front camber to -3.6° and toe to +1/8" out. Ride heights were already set fairly high, as we cannot lower the car as much as we like without knocking the rear geometry all to crap (those $100 relocation brackets work wonders, if only Street Prepared would allow them). Tire pressures were set at 35 psi front, 32 psi rear and the Moton ClubSport 2-way shocks were set at the middle rebound and compression settings front and rear. The Whiteline swaybars were set in their middle settings front and rear as well. Blue tape was placed on sections where we thought the tires could rub, the video camera was installed, and the new AIM Solo timing display was set-up for this course. Then I started taking laps....



Some early and some late test laps in the Mustang - click for video


This is a course I have driven hundreds of times so it usually doesn't take long before I am familiar with the course layout and my times stabilize within a tenth. Then we can make adjustments and check times - I let the clocks by the guide and not my "impressions". The AIM Solo was within hundredths of the Farmtek timers so I could see my laps real time. I took 2 hot laps at a time going clockwise on a course with a single start-stop line. In the video above you can hear me keeping notes, but Jason kept a full log of adjustments and lap times throughout the 3 hours of test driving I did. Ryan was busy all day making set-up changes to the bars, shocks, alignment and tire pressures. Plus we had one unexpected delay - a flat tire.



A flat out at the Mineral Ring it shouldn't be much of a surprise, as we got a flat in Brianne's Subaru at the same site a month ago (which shut down our testing early that day), but this time we were prepared. Theoretically we are always learning from our past mistakes, right? So I had just gone out for a two lap blast but after the 2nd slalom cone I new something was "off". The car wouldn't turn right the the left front tire was howling under load - I waived off the lap quickly and got back to the trailer for a look. Yep, there was a pin hole in the left front and it was deflating fast. With a plug in the tire, the generator fired up and the compressor buzzing along, the tire was fixed, aired up, and I was back on course in about 3 minutes.

Over 3 hours of testing I made a total of 38 laps, and finished with blisters on my hands and a shoulder injury that was howling from some violent corrections I had to make using some of the wackier settings we tried, but we made it through the full sweep of component adjustments we wanted to attack. The new bars worked great and had more adjustments than many others out there with 4 holes per side. The rear tires were no longer rubbing and tucked inboard for a 1" narrower track than before. The Mustang was handling better than ever, especially in slaloms, where I could violently throw it back and forth. The pictures show that the lateral axle movement is much reduced from before (when we had a Panhard rod), and it was easier to drive. We had fixed some other long standing issue, too, but I forget what that was at the moment? It will come back to me.

DSC4243-L.jpg


After 3 hours in the car I was pretty hot, sweaty, sore and tired; so were Jason and Ryan, who did most of the heavy lifting with the test adjustments. My driving was starting to get sloppy by about lap 30, where I could only do 1 clean lap out of 2. The temps were climbing towards 100°F so we called it a day. After we loaded back up, grabbed a late lunch, we headed back to the shop in Plano and made it back by 5:45 pm. We have a lot of new cut vinyl graphics and decals to install today that Jason has been working on for the past few days. The graphic design is all Amy's doing, and not at all my thing. If you see the car and have any comments, direct them to her! :D We are mounting up a sticker set of 315/30/18 Hoosier A6 tires, and I hope this is the right tire choice. I know that 335's would rub the fenders almost as badly as the 345s did, so I am staying safe with the 315s all around. It will likely always push (understeer) with such a non-square set-up anyway (like it did with the 315/345s we ran before).

======

What we found in this test, starting at full soft on each bar and doing laps at every setting... is that with these 315mm R compound tires and even 450F/175R coilover spring rates, the car was faster with the front and rear bar set to full stuff. We tested one end first, then the other, and the timers proved this to us.

After the next event we did in the car with this setup (2012 Solo Nationals) we upped the spring rates from 450F/175R to 550F/250R, and the lean went down and the car got faster. Later we went to 800F/350R, and it was faster still. By 2013 we were almost exclusively doing NASA Time Trial events, and even on a road course the same basic setup still worked better with the bars at full stiff. These heavy pony cars need ALL the swaybar and a LOT of spring rate to control their movements.

With the soft lowering springs the OP has (all lowering springs are super soft - no matter what "Rating" they tout; its fake numbers) I suspect the ideal setup to keep the tires from rolling over will still be to set the bars at full stiff. Just my $.02.

Cheers,
 
Last edited:

ExSRT8Guy

Been There, Done That
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Posts
132
Reaction score
2
Location
Scotts Valley, CA
Questions for Norm or Terry (or anyone else who'd care to chime in):
  • Is there anything to be gained from stronger front-bar end links, since they're under compression?
  • At the stiffer bar levels, is there any distortion to the strut housing, and, if so, does it matter?
 
Last edited:

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Posts
3,615
Reaction score
316
Location
RIP - You will be missed
Questions for Norm or Terry (or anyone else who'd care to chime in):
Is there anything to be gained from stronger front-bar end links, since they're under compression?
Higher resistance against buckling. This can and sometimes does happen. Stronger endlink designs might have attachment details better suited to occasional removal/re-installation.

UMI endlinks.jpg

At the stiffer bar levels, is there any distortion to the strut housing, and, if so, does it matter?
At any bar stiffness level there will be some strut housing distortion. I have no idea at what level it matters; you'd probably have to have access to a strut mfr's finite element analysis or test data for that.


Norm
 

ExSRT8Guy

Been There, Done That
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Posts
132
Reaction score
2
Location
Scotts Valley, CA
Thanks, Norm. Didn't consider buckling, but I assumed the same on the strut housing distortion. I'll source some adjustable end links, and go full-stiff on the front bar; it's currently on the middle setting (35mm BMR).
 

Vorshlag-Fair

Official Site Vendor
Official Vendor
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Posts
1,592
Reaction score
107
Location
Dallas, TX
Spherical endlinks are nice - for race cars. We've built some for S197s...

11218234_10203037432255534_600766259524174142_o-M.jpg


We made these beefy units from some hex bar, rod ends, and a little time on the lathe.

11143603_10203037428215433_2920262932870336826_o-M.jpg


And while these are fine for race cars, unprotected rod ends like this will wear out QUICKLY on a street car. Road grit + rain = short lifespan.


The video above shows you what a worn out endlink rod end looks and sounds like. That noise will drive you mad... #KnockKnock #WhosThere #CrappyEndlinks ;)

DSC_2151-L.jpg


For street cars and dual-purpose street/track cars alike (90% of the folks on here are dual purpose) we like these adjustable endlinks with sealed ball joint ends from Whiteline. We have been using these for 6+ years and have yet to replace a worn unit.

_DSC7416-L.jpg


We even have shorter then S197 stock versions for use with various aftermarket coilovers - which usually move the endlink bracket down the strut tube by at least an inch.

B61G1934_B-L.jpg


As for the swaybar bracket distorting? That would take a heck of a swaybar load, and we just haven't seen that as an issue on any S197 struts.

B61G4254-L.jpg


We have seen some brands of struts bend this bracket on other cars, but nothing made outside of China. We make a few custom strut applications (when we can get the Bilstein housings/struts) and have designed endlink brackets for these and other struts before, so we've tested this directly. Not to worry there unless you have $500 eBay coilovers. ;)

Cheers,
 

RJdude3

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Posts
33
Reaction score
0
Thank you Vorshlag, that is great info! The SCCA track night was great. Car was much improved, rans over 2 seconds a lap faster, even though it was 95 degrees at the track. The motor and tires weren't happy but the driver was!!!

Cant wait to do some more test and tuning.
 

ExSRT8Guy

Been There, Done That
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Posts
132
Reaction score
2
Location
Scotts Valley, CA
DSC_2151-L.jpg


For street cars and dual-purpose street/track cars alike (90% of the folks on here are dual purpose) we like these adjustable endlinks with sealed ball joint ends from Whiteline. We have been using these for 6+ years and have yet to replace a worn unit.

As for the swaybar bracket distorting? That would take a heck of a swaybar load, and we just haven't seen that as an issue on any S197 struts.

Thanks for the comprehensive reply, Terry. Whitelines are actually what I ordered; should deliver today. Will install those and go to full stiff on the front bar this weekend.
 

modernbeat

Jason McDaniel @ Vorshlag
Official Vendor
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Posts
412
Reaction score
15
Location
Dallas, TX
On the bracket distortion or tearing, we usually only see that when the bar bottoms out on something like the arm or chassis. It's usually because the length of the end-link is wrong, or it's put on the wrong side of the bar or bracket.
 

Support us!

Support Us - Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Sponsor Links

Banner image
Back
Top