It's 'clique'...not 'click'.ya they did that to me also for this, so i had to add it to my sig![]()

It's 'clique'...not 'click'.ya they did that to me also for this, so i had to add it to my sig![]()

i wasnt really asking. i was saying i did make that.It might be possible to make 565 whp with 39s if the dyno was very liberal and the tune a bit leaner. As mentioned, fuel pressure can be given a boost to in effect make the injector act like a larger one. I don't believe it would be accomplished with a low duty cycle though, they are probably pumping for dear life.
my tune actually is slightly rich. but like i said way before im going to 60lb injectors with the new block and more boost39's = 475 max.
theyre at ~90% cycle at that point. maybe with higher fuel pressure they can go into the 500's but why would you ever risk running lean, esp under boost. 60's will keep your cylinders full of fuel all the way into the 800's
And its "loser", not "looser"... sheesh...It's 'clique'...not 'click'.![]()
is anyone running around 550-575 rwhp on 93?
i wasnt really asking. i was saying i did make that.
my tune actually is slightly rich. but like i said way before im going to 60lb injectors with the new block and more boost
you know i probably would but the simple fact that people are going to hate on me anyways. why go out of my way when people are just going to put in negative rep standings on me? i know what i run and with the low duty cycle and slightly rich tune, im safe. i would post my logs and dyno sheets but i doubt it would make a difference cuz people are going to believe what they want. sorry to come off rude, im still a little bitter about the haters.Get the data logs from your tuner and post them up.
Sounds to me like you're a liar. You really think we're all that dumb?you know i probably would but the simple fact that people are going to hate on me anyways. why go out of my way when people are just going to put in negative rep standings on me? i know what i run and with the low duty cycle and slightly rich tune, im safe. i would post my logs and dyno sheets but i doubt it would make a difference cuz people are going to believe what they want. sorry to come off rude, im still a little bitter about the haters.
Sounds to me like you're a liar. You really think we're all that dumb?
thats what im working on. going to see if he kept it on file for me. thanksIt would be really easy to shut up the haters if you would just post the dyno sheets or even better yet if you have the dyno files the people could see the duty cycle themselves.
Is that on 9 PSI?I'm making 560 rwhp and 580 rwtq on 91 pump gas.

My magic 8 ball says he didn't keep it on file.
Is that on 9 PSI?![]()
is anyone running around 550-575 rwhp on 93? i am debating on a new shortblock and cam and doing a smaller pully with #39 injectors and gt500 fuel pump and i want to make sure 93 will work.