JeremyH
3V Fuel Guru
It has thicker webs because it's less dense. You guys are crazy if you think a cast crank will be on par with a forged crank.
Makes perfect sense to me. Indeed they are thicker to make it stronger, one is thinner because the steel is denser. Two ways to get the same result.
Much like the whole chromoly vs steel thing. Chromoly is denser and stronger. So you can machine thinner parts with less material and get the same strength as regular steel being thicker. The end result is two similar strength parts regardless of which way its made.
The cast cranks (me, Josh, Jeremy) have all done very well with higher hp numbers. Higher to me means high 600's to mid 700's. Survived clutch dumps, many track passes, plus normal driving. Those are levels that kill GT500 motors.
What would you expect? Does it make any sense to spend $1000 on a new forged crank when the cast one will fit the bill? BTW new forged cranks are from $800 to $1100. Kellogg doesn't make them anymore. They sold the tooling to Lunati. Eagles are in the $800 range while Lunati goes for over $1000.
The biggest thing to me would be having 33% more fastening with the 8 bolt vs 6 bolt. Like I said earlier I would probably go forged with something built for big power like 1000. Still though, it would be interesting to find out.
Dillon was running 700rwhp+ on his old setup with a stock crank as well.
That other crank thread reminded me of something Bruce. The 99-01 Windsor motors had 8 bolt cast steel cranks, you could probably find one of those cheap in a junk motor. lol
Last edited:



