I wonder why the rear pads gave up b4 the fronts? A fellow here in town has a 2012 GT manual. His rear oem pads were trashed, oem fronts were fine..just from aggressive street /dd use. He said he always left the TC on....that may have been a contributing factor.
I don't see excess rear wear on my HPS pads...(11.8" rear power slot rotors). Front HPS are fine too. However, that is on a 2010 GT, with power slot 12.4" front rotor's. I did install the cdc front brake ducts 2 yrs ago. They are only 2.5" silicone hoses fed into the cdc 14" dust shields. For dd /street use/rare autocross, the HPS pads + ducts seem to do the trick for my application. I have the TC off if it's dry out.... and on if it's wet out.
Local mustang folks who use HP+ pads, combined with slotted + cross drilled rotors all complain of abnormal rotor wear, excess dust, and excess pad wear, and slightly squealing brakes at real low speeds. Having said that, the local ricer auto cross folks swear by HP+ pads. That could be attributed to the difference in weight of the vehicles.