ZmanM3
The Evil One
Ken never sent me my tune either...![]()
Don't you need to actually order one and pay for it to get a tune?
Ken never sent me my tune either...![]()
even if it's a email tune shouldn't we all expect to have some changes made if need be? 200 bucks is 200 bucks and one of the most expensive single non dyno tunes out there, I use lund but haven't had any real problems except for some timing being pulled because of knock due to some shitty gas but, Damn I would hope for my 200 dollars to have some datalogs sent and to correct issues if there were some, And Just a good buisness practice. Every car is different and not every off the shelf tune is optimal.
My point is there is nothing wrong with our tune and we don't include dataloggging support like you are looking for. I'm not looking to argue with you.
Like I said I'm glad you are happy with your new tune and good luck with your car.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
all that and .08 ET difference? the trap difference of 3 mph could be racked up to difference in the tracks clocks, they should be consistent...but one never knows for sure.
Good experienence w/Jon before Ken was with Lund Racing.
Same good experience after Ken joined.
Both Ken and Jon have gone above and beyond on several issues I had with my Mustang, and now with an F150 (laugh if you will
I've always gotten prompt responses form both Jon and Ken. When I don't, I resend the email, then get a pretty prompt response. You have to realize the volume these guys see, sometimes things get lost in the mix, it happens to everyone.
even if it's a email tune shouldn't we all expect to have some changes made if need be? 200 bucks is 200 bucks and one of the most expensive single non dyno tunes out there, I use lund but haven't had any real problems except for some timing being pulled because of knock due to some shitty gas but, Damn I would hope for my 200 dollars to have some datalogs sent and to correct issues if there were some, And Just a good buisness practice. Every car is different and not every off the shelf tune is optimal.
Of course we will correct any issues. He didn't have any issues. He just wanted more MPH. I looked at his logs and they were exactly like they should be. We don't get very aggressive with timing because that is what kills them. Other jam as much timing in as they can and ride the knock sensors all day long.
Like was said earlier, some people are still trapping more than you with less. Maybe you got a turd from the factory.
But the fact is, you got what you paid for. A good running car. Maybe you think it runs better now. And I have already told you I'm happy for you.
Don't you need to actually order one and pay for it to get a tune?
Like was said earlier, some people are still trapping more than you with less. Maybe you got a turd from the factory.
But the fact is, you got what you paid for. A good running car. Maybe you think it runs better now. And I have already told you I'm happy for you.

I'm glad someone said what I've been thinking. Follow some of his posts on other sites and you'll see.This guy is a community retard. See the CAI thread.....
http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=84267
Based on what I have seen via his YouTube post and he making this thread, he is acting as a puppeteer for Bama. They must have given him a free tune for his endorsement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_R5QBlU1Bs
Anywho, how many 5.0's has Bama blown up due to their superior tuning? For those curious, never take anything at face value....
No Lund fanboy here although I'd have no problem running one of their tunes. Bama? Not in my lifetime.Stop being Lund fanboys
This guy is a community retard. See the CAI thread.....
http://www.s197forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=84267
Based on what I have seen via his YouTube post and he making this thread, he is acting as a puppeteer for Bama. They must have given him a free tune for his endorsement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_R5QBlU1Bs
Anywho, how many 5.0's has Bama blown up due to their superior tuning? For those curious, never take anything at face value....
Lol really? I gave my experiences with both companies. Facts speak for themselves. Don't be naive. For me Bama has better performance, better customer service, better price, more tunes, more support, cylinder 8 warranty, and free tunes for life.. Stop being Lund fanboys and look at the facts.. I let you guys talk me into getting their tune to start and I wish I hadn't. Oh well. And no I didn't get free tunes in return for the good review. They didn't even know I was gonna post a review lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
If you look at the facts your naive ass would know that bama's number 8 warranty is only good if you have run their tune and only their tune from the beginning. Guess your out of luck.
Did you run both tunes on the same day under same conditions? If not, your comparison is null.
to be honest with you Iceguy, you're kindve like the guy who wants to reinvent the wheel when others have already been there, done that and have the t-shirt from it. We know what combinations work and what do not work but everything you're spouting is pretty much 100% incorrect from your test methods and how you present your results as gospel.
Especially how you claim a CAI is uselful and how you tested it lol.
Meh, I've ran slightly better with a bone stock car than his videoI have a 12.32 slip around here.