Ok, So what do 'ya Think....!!

[GT E UPP]

Just recently came off the Mustang Dyno with.....Brenspeed B326, FRPP CNC Ported Heads, FRPP HotRod Cams, Whipple-HO Intercooled, 16 degrees timing , and with only 14 psi boost. Graph says 666 rwhp / 683 RWTQ with corrected (WCF) numbers at 683 RWHP / 700 RWTQ. Not looking to make the results higher or to look better then what they are...just not sure what numbers to use ..?? There seems to be a debate on whether or not to use the Corrected Numbers.

 

[Department Of Boost]

Just recently came off the Mustang Dyno with.....Brenspeed B326, FRPP CNC Ported Heads, FRPP HotRod Cams, Whipple-HO Intercooled, 16 degrees timing , and with only 14 psi boost. Graph says 666 rwhp / 683 RWTQ with corrected (WCF) numbers at 683 RWHP / 700 RWTQ. Not looking to make the results higher or to look better then what they are...just not sure what numbers to use ..?? There seems to be a debate on whether or not to use the Corrected Numbers.

What fuel?

Seems like both sets of numbers are high.

 

[GT E UPP]

What fuel?

Seems like both sets of numbers are high.

sunoco 94...
And, I'll leave it at that !!

 

[stkjock]

Corrected

 

[GT E UPP]

Corrected

Thanks Man..!

 

[BruceH]

It really doesn't matter what numbers you use. The motor is putting out the same power.

Most people use the lowest. For instance where I am corrected numbers are almost always lower because of the nearness to sea level and usually good air. My actual numbers are about 30/30 higher most times.

People in higher elevations and especially desert areas usually see corrected numbers higher than actual. Most people will list the lower numbers because they are what the motor is really putting out.

In the end they are just numbers. If you are comparing to your buddy then use corrected and make sure the weather data is accurate. The correction factor is just an estimate of what the motor would make with preset temp, humidity, barometric pressure, and elevation.

 

[Wes06]

666, simply to freak people out

 

[Dillon Dollar]

Nice

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

[GT E UPP]

It really doesn't matter what numbers you use. The motor is putting out the same power.

Most people use the lowest. For instance where I am corrected numbers are almost always lower because of the nearness to sea level and usually good air. My actual numbers are about 30/30 higher most times.

People in higher elevations and especially desert areas usually see corrected numbers higher than actual. Most people will list the lower numbers because they are what the motor is really putting out.

In the end they are just numbers. If you are comparing to your buddy then use corrected and make sure the weather data is accurate. The correction factor is just an estimate of what the motor would make with preset temp, humidity, barometric pressure, and elevation.

Thanks Bruce ...Excellent explanation!!

 

[Zodiac]

Like said before, stick with the 666 number. I would love to have a HP raiting of 666.

 

[stkjock]

Like said before, stick with the 666 number. I would love to have a HP raiting of 666.

: mine made 666 ft/lbs

 

[MexGT]

I'd asume a 2.3 whipple, right?

Nice #'s !

 

[Timmbo]

"Ok, So what do 'ya Think....!!"

I'm thinkin I've got a lot to look forward to with my B326!! Congrats! Nice numbers. BTW, what trans are you running?

 

[GT E UPP]

I'd asume a 2.3 whipple, right?

Nice #'s !

Yep Whipple-Ho, 2.3, Intercooled, and thanks MexGT

 

[GT E UPP]

"Ok, So what do 'ya Think....!!"

I'm thinkin I've got a lot to look forward to with my B326!! Congrats! Nice numbers. BTW, what trans are you running?

Still running Stock TR-3650 with no issues..
However, Had to upgrage my Spec Super Twin Disc clutch to an 8 Bolt

 

[808muscle]

Black on Black with 666 HP..........dude, roll with it!

 

[Timmbo]

Still running Stock TR-3650 with no issues..
However, Had to upgrage my Spec Super Twin Dic clutch to an 8 Bolt

Impressive.